[afx114]

The irony here is that this liberal switched from coffee to tea years ago.

[afx114]

The irony here is that this liberal switched from coffee to tea years ago.

[afx114]

The irony here is that this liberal switched from coffee to tea years ago.

[afx114]

Could it be that walkable areas are desirable and rare — and therefore have higher prices? Higher-priced homes have a lower rates of default, no? The question then becomes: are these walkable areas higher priced because they are walkable, or for some other reason?

And is downtown SD really walkable? Sure, the nightlife is walkable, but what about actually living there? How many parks are there in downtown? How many grocery stores? How many community gathering spaces?

[afx114]

Could it be that walkable areas are desirable and rare — and therefore have higher prices? Higher-priced homes have a lower rates of default, no? The question then becomes: are these walkable areas higher priced because they are walkable, or for some other reason?

And is downtown SD really walkable? Sure, the nightlife is walkable, but what about actually living there? How many parks are there in downtown? How many grocery stores? How many community gathering spaces?

[afx114]

Could it be that walkable areas are desirable and rare — and therefore have higher prices? Higher-priced homes have a lower rates of default, no? The question then becomes: are these walkable areas higher priced because they are walkable, or for some other reason?

And is downtown SD really walkable? Sure, the nightlife is walkable, but what about actually living there? How many parks are there in downtown? How many grocery stores? How many community gathering spaces?

[afx114]

Could it be that walkable areas are desirable and rare — and therefore have higher prices? Higher-priced homes have a lower rates of default, no? The question then becomes: are these walkable areas higher priced because they are walkable, or for some other reason?

And is downtown SD really walkable? Sure, the nightlife is walkable, but what about actually living there? How many parks are there in downtown? How many grocery stores? How many community gathering spaces?

[afx114]

Could it be that walkable areas are desirable and rare — and therefore have higher prices? Higher-priced homes have a lower rates of default, no? The question then becomes: are these walkable areas higher priced because they are walkable, or for some other reason?

And is downtown SD really walkable? Sure, the nightlife is walkable, but what about actually living there? How many parks are there in downtown? How many grocery stores? How many community gathering spaces?

[afx114]

Just following up on this story… Council members have rejected their own raise:

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/feb/22/15-percent-raise-rejected-san-diego-council/

Council members determined that, given the city’s ongoing budget deficits and recent cuts to services, no raise at all was appropriate. As a result, council members will go on being paid $75,386 per year and Mayor Jerry Sanders will still make $100,464. Their pay has remained at that level since July 2003.

In April 2008, the council approved a 24 percent pay hike for itself but backed down after a public outcry.

[afx114]

Just following up on this story… Council members have rejected their own raise:

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/feb/22/15-percent-raise-rejected-san-diego-council/

Council members determined that, given the city’s ongoing budget deficits and recent cuts to services, no raise at all was appropriate. As a result, council members will go on being paid $75,386 per year and Mayor Jerry Sanders will still make $100,464. Their pay has remained at that level since July 2003.

In April 2008, the council approved a 24 percent pay hike for itself but backed down after a public outcry.

[afx114]

Just following up on this story… Council members have rejected their own raise:

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/feb/22/15-percent-raise-rejected-san-diego-council/

Council members determined that, given the city’s ongoing budget deficits and recent cuts to services, no raise at all was appropriate. As a result, council members will go on being paid $75,386 per year and Mayor Jerry Sanders will still make $100,464. Their pay has remained at that level since July 2003.

In April 2008, the council approved a 24 percent pay hike for itself but backed down after a public outcry.

[afx114]

Just following up on this story… Council members have rejected their own raise:

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/feb/22/15-percent-raise-rejected-san-diego-council/

Council members determined that, given the city’s ongoing budget deficits and recent cuts to services, no raise at all was appropriate. As a result, council members will go on being paid $75,386 per year and Mayor Jerry Sanders will still make $100,464. Their pay has remained at that level since July 2003.

In April 2008, the council approved a 24 percent pay hike for itself but backed down after a public outcry.

[afx114]

Just following up on this story… Council members have rejected their own raise:

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/feb/22/15-percent-raise-rejected-san-diego-council/

Council members determined that, given the city’s ongoing budget deficits and recent cuts to services, no raise at all was appropriate. As a result, council members will go on being paid $75,386 per year and Mayor Jerry Sanders will still make $100,464. Their pay has remained at that level since July 2003.

In April 2008, the council approved a 24 percent pay hike for itself but backed down after a public outcry.

[afx114]

Here is a captivating interview about the incident with Tom Slick, the Epic Beard Man.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sWgtGdl7KQ

What a character. I’d love to throw back a few rounds with this guy. Lets carry this to the logical conclusion:

[afx114]

Here is a captivating interview about the incident with Tom Slick, the Epic Beard Man.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sWgtGdl7KQ

What a character. I’d love to throw back a few rounds with this guy. Lets carry this to the logical conclusion:

[Author]

Posts