Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 23, 2009 at 2:02 PM in reply to: “White House collects Web users’ data without notice” #461535September 23, 2009 at 12:16 PM in reply to: “White House collects Web users’ data without notice” #460667
Aecetia
ParticipantWell said Pup, as always. The old it’s the economy stupid, should now be supplanted by it’s the Constitution stupid. Bringing up Bush does not change what the current POTUS is doing to undermine basic American privileges. I wonder what the people who voted for him think of his throwing Israel under the bus??? I think this is a distraction from health care, but it will only give strength to our enemies both foreign and domestic. I guess he did not understand his oath of office!
September 23, 2009 at 12:16 PM in reply to: “White House collects Web users’ data without notice” #460859ParticipantWell said Pup, as always. The old it’s the economy stupid, should now be supplanted by it’s the Constitution stupid. Bringing up Bush does not change what the current POTUS is doing to undermine basic American privileges. I wonder what the people who voted for him think of his throwing Israel under the bus??? I think this is a distraction from health care, but it will only give strength to our enemies both foreign and domestic. I guess he did not understand his oath of office!
September 23, 2009 at 12:16 PM in reply to: “White House collects Web users’ data without notice” #461200ParticipantWell said Pup, as always. The old it’s the economy stupid, should now be supplanted by it’s the Constitution stupid. Bringing up Bush does not change what the current POTUS is doing to undermine basic American privileges. I wonder what the people who voted for him think of his throwing Israel under the bus??? I think this is a distraction from health care, but it will only give strength to our enemies both foreign and domestic. I guess he did not understand his oath of office!
September 23, 2009 at 12:16 PM in reply to: “White House collects Web users’ data without notice” #461273ParticipantWell said Pup, as always. The old it’s the economy stupid, should now be supplanted by it’s the Constitution stupid. Bringing up Bush does not change what the current POTUS is doing to undermine basic American privileges. I wonder what the people who voted for him think of his throwing Israel under the bus??? I think this is a distraction from health care, but it will only give strength to our enemies both foreign and domestic. I guess he did not understand his oath of office!
September 23, 2009 at 12:16 PM in reply to: “White House collects Web users’ data without notice” #461476ParticipantWell said Pup, as always. The old it’s the economy stupid, should now be supplanted by it’s the Constitution stupid. Bringing up Bush does not change what the current POTUS is doing to undermine basic American privileges. I wonder what the people who voted for him think of his throwing Israel under the bus??? I think this is a distraction from health care, but it will only give strength to our enemies both foreign and domestic. I guess he did not understand his oath of office!
September 22, 2009 at 5:00 PM in reply to: “White House collects Web users’ data without notice” #460302ParticipantAlong the lines of Allan’s post. We did not go to Iraq without Democratic support. Quit being partisan and start complaining about the erosion of your Constitutional freedoms.
Senate approves Iraq war resolution
Administration applauds voteWASHINGTON (CNN) — In a major victory for the White House, the Senate early Friday voted 77-23 to authorize President Bush to attack Iraq if Saddam Hussein refuses to give up weapons of mass destruction as required by U.N. resolutions.
Hours earlier, the House approved an identical resolution, 296-133.
The president praised the congressional action, declaring “America speaks with one voice.”
“The Congress has spoken clearly to the international community and the United Nations Security Council,” Bush said in a statement. “Saddam Hussein and his outlaw regime pose a grave threat to the region, the world and the United States. Inaction is not an option, disarmament is a must.”
While the outcome of the vote was never in doubt, its passage followed several days of spirited debate in which a small but vocal group of lawmakers charged the resolution was too broad and premature.
The resolution requires Bush to declare to Congress either before or within 48 hours after beginning military action that diplomatic efforts to enforce the U.N. resolutions have failed.
The Senate vote sharply divided Democrats, with 29 voting for the measure and 21 against. All Republicans except Sen. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island voted for passage.
September 22, 2009 at 5:00 PM in reply to: “White House collects Web users’ data without notice” #460494ParticipantAlong the lines of Allan’s post. We did not go to Iraq without Democratic support. Quit being partisan and start complaining about the erosion of your Constitutional freedoms.
Senate approves Iraq war resolution
Administration applauds voteWASHINGTON (CNN) — In a major victory for the White House, the Senate early Friday voted 77-23 to authorize President Bush to attack Iraq if Saddam Hussein refuses to give up weapons of mass destruction as required by U.N. resolutions.
Hours earlier, the House approved an identical resolution, 296-133.
The president praised the congressional action, declaring “America speaks with one voice.”
“The Congress has spoken clearly to the international community and the United Nations Security Council,” Bush said in a statement. “Saddam Hussein and his outlaw regime pose a grave threat to the region, the world and the United States. Inaction is not an option, disarmament is a must.”
While the outcome of the vote was never in doubt, its passage followed several days of spirited debate in which a small but vocal group of lawmakers charged the resolution was too broad and premature.
The resolution requires Bush to declare to Congress either before or within 48 hours after beginning military action that diplomatic efforts to enforce the U.N. resolutions have failed.
The Senate vote sharply divided Democrats, with 29 voting for the measure and 21 against. All Republicans except Sen. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island voted for passage.
September 22, 2009 at 5:00 PM in reply to: “White House collects Web users’ data without notice” #460835ParticipantAlong the lines of Allan’s post. We did not go to Iraq without Democratic support. Quit being partisan and start complaining about the erosion of your Constitutional freedoms.
Senate approves Iraq war resolution
Administration applauds voteWASHINGTON (CNN) — In a major victory for the White House, the Senate early Friday voted 77-23 to authorize President Bush to attack Iraq if Saddam Hussein refuses to give up weapons of mass destruction as required by U.N. resolutions.
Hours earlier, the House approved an identical resolution, 296-133.
The president praised the congressional action, declaring “America speaks with one voice.”
“The Congress has spoken clearly to the international community and the United Nations Security Council,” Bush said in a statement. “Saddam Hussein and his outlaw regime pose a grave threat to the region, the world and the United States. Inaction is not an option, disarmament is a must.”
While the outcome of the vote was never in doubt, its passage followed several days of spirited debate in which a small but vocal group of lawmakers charged the resolution was too broad and premature.
The resolution requires Bush to declare to Congress either before or within 48 hours after beginning military action that diplomatic efforts to enforce the U.N. resolutions have failed.
The Senate vote sharply divided Democrats, with 29 voting for the measure and 21 against. All Republicans except Sen. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island voted for passage.
September 22, 2009 at 5:00 PM in reply to: “White House collects Web users’ data without notice” #460908ParticipantAlong the lines of Allan’s post. We did not go to Iraq without Democratic support. Quit being partisan and start complaining about the erosion of your Constitutional freedoms.
Senate approves Iraq war resolution
Administration applauds voteWASHINGTON (CNN) — In a major victory for the White House, the Senate early Friday voted 77-23 to authorize President Bush to attack Iraq if Saddam Hussein refuses to give up weapons of mass destruction as required by U.N. resolutions.
Hours earlier, the House approved an identical resolution, 296-133.
The president praised the congressional action, declaring “America speaks with one voice.”
“The Congress has spoken clearly to the international community and the United Nations Security Council,” Bush said in a statement. “Saddam Hussein and his outlaw regime pose a grave threat to the region, the world and the United States. Inaction is not an option, disarmament is a must.”
While the outcome of the vote was never in doubt, its passage followed several days of spirited debate in which a small but vocal group of lawmakers charged the resolution was too broad and premature.
The resolution requires Bush to declare to Congress either before or within 48 hours after beginning military action that diplomatic efforts to enforce the U.N. resolutions have failed.
The Senate vote sharply divided Democrats, with 29 voting for the measure and 21 against. All Republicans except Sen. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island voted for passage.
September 22, 2009 at 5:00 PM in reply to: “White House collects Web users’ data without notice” #461110ParticipantAlong the lines of Allan’s post. We did not go to Iraq without Democratic support. Quit being partisan and start complaining about the erosion of your Constitutional freedoms.
Senate approves Iraq war resolution
Administration applauds voteWASHINGTON (CNN) — In a major victory for the White House, the Senate early Friday voted 77-23 to authorize President Bush to attack Iraq if Saddam Hussein refuses to give up weapons of mass destruction as required by U.N. resolutions.
Hours earlier, the House approved an identical resolution, 296-133.
The president praised the congressional action, declaring “America speaks with one voice.”
“The Congress has spoken clearly to the international community and the United Nations Security Council,” Bush said in a statement. “Saddam Hussein and his outlaw regime pose a grave threat to the region, the world and the United States. Inaction is not an option, disarmament is a must.”
While the outcome of the vote was never in doubt, its passage followed several days of spirited debate in which a small but vocal group of lawmakers charged the resolution was too broad and premature.
The resolution requires Bush to declare to Congress either before or within 48 hours after beginning military action that diplomatic efforts to enforce the U.N. resolutions have failed.
The Senate vote sharply divided Democrats, with 29 voting for the measure and 21 against. All Republicans except Sen. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island voted for passage.
ParticipantParticipantParticipantParticipant -
AuthorPosts
