Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
4plexowner
Participantsorry, Allan, but I don’t see how the Privateer article supports your case – the article is talking about the time period from 1976 to 1993 – unless my math skills have deteriorated significantly, 1976 to 1993 (17 years) and 1500 years are significantly different time periods
the Privateer newsletter is also gold-positive so I’m curious how you took this particular article out of context from the Privateer’s overall premise
Participantsorry, Allan, but I don’t see how the Privateer article supports your case – the article is talking about the time period from 1976 to 1993 – unless my math skills have deteriorated significantly, 1976 to 1993 (17 years) and 1500 years are significantly different time periods
the Privateer newsletter is also gold-positive so I’m curious how you took this particular article out of context from the Privateer’s overall premise
Participantsorry, Allan, but I don’t see how the Privateer article supports your case – the article is talking about the time period from 1976 to 1993 – unless my math skills have deteriorated significantly, 1976 to 1993 (17 years) and 1500 years are significantly different time periods
the Privateer newsletter is also gold-positive so I’m curious how you took this particular article out of context from the Privateer’s overall premise
Participantsorry, Allan, but I don’t see how the Privateer article supports your case – the article is talking about the time period from 1976 to 1993 – unless my math skills have deteriorated significantly, 1976 to 1993 (17 years) and 1500 years are significantly different time periods
the Privateer newsletter is also gold-positive so I’m curious how you took this particular article out of context from the Privateer’s overall premise
Participant“It’s the old supply vs. demand curve.”
If you want to reduce the issue to simple supply vs demand you need to address the 14 million housing units that are currently sitting vacant
You also need to address the fact that as the economy declines housing density increases (more people living in each housing unit) so the demand for new housing decreases as economic conditions decline
It’s also worth noting that the last time mortgage interest rates were high (mid-teens + in the 1980’s) inflation was feeding into wages so increasing incomes could support larger mortgage payments and the PSYCHOLOGY of rising wages made the rising interest rates less onerous – contrast that environment with today’s where incomes are not only NOT rising but people are in fear of losing their jobs and not finding another one
Participant“It’s the old supply vs. demand curve.”
If you want to reduce the issue to simple supply vs demand you need to address the 14 million housing units that are currently sitting vacant
You also need to address the fact that as the economy declines housing density increases (more people living in each housing unit) so the demand for new housing decreases as economic conditions decline
It’s also worth noting that the last time mortgage interest rates were high (mid-teens + in the 1980’s) inflation was feeding into wages so increasing incomes could support larger mortgage payments and the PSYCHOLOGY of rising wages made the rising interest rates less onerous – contrast that environment with today’s where incomes are not only NOT rising but people are in fear of losing their jobs and not finding another one
Participant“It’s the old supply vs. demand curve.”
If you want to reduce the issue to simple supply vs demand you need to address the 14 million housing units that are currently sitting vacant
You also need to address the fact that as the economy declines housing density increases (more people living in each housing unit) so the demand for new housing decreases as economic conditions decline
It’s also worth noting that the last time mortgage interest rates were high (mid-teens + in the 1980’s) inflation was feeding into wages so increasing incomes could support larger mortgage payments and the PSYCHOLOGY of rising wages made the rising interest rates less onerous – contrast that environment with today’s where incomes are not only NOT rising but people are in fear of losing their jobs and not finding another one
Participant“It’s the old supply vs. demand curve.”
If you want to reduce the issue to simple supply vs demand you need to address the 14 million housing units that are currently sitting vacant
You also need to address the fact that as the economy declines housing density increases (more people living in each housing unit) so the demand for new housing decreases as economic conditions decline
It’s also worth noting that the last time mortgage interest rates were high (mid-teens + in the 1980’s) inflation was feeding into wages so increasing incomes could support larger mortgage payments and the PSYCHOLOGY of rising wages made the rising interest rates less onerous – contrast that environment with today’s where incomes are not only NOT rising but people are in fear of losing their jobs and not finding another one
Participant“It’s the old supply vs. demand curve.”
If you want to reduce the issue to simple supply vs demand you need to address the 14 million housing units that are currently sitting vacant
You also need to address the fact that as the economy declines housing density increases (more people living in each housing unit) so the demand for new housing decreases as economic conditions decline
It’s also worth noting that the last time mortgage interest rates were high (mid-teens + in the 1980’s) inflation was feeding into wages so increasing incomes could support larger mortgage payments and the PSYCHOLOGY of rising wages made the rising interest rates less onerous – contrast that environment with today’s where incomes are not only NOT rising but people are in fear of losing their jobs and not finding another one
Participant“extremis” coming closer?
China warns Federal Reserve over ‘printing money’
~
I listed our liabilities on the low side when I said $60-70 trillion – but hey, what’s a few trillion these days?
from the article above:
“We at the Dallas Fed believe the total is over $99 trillion,” he said in February.
Participant“extremis” coming closer?
China warns Federal Reserve over ‘printing money’
~
I listed our liabilities on the low side when I said $60-70 trillion – but hey, what’s a few trillion these days?
from the article above:
“We at the Dallas Fed believe the total is over $99 trillion,” he said in February.
Participant“extremis” coming closer?
China warns Federal Reserve over ‘printing money’
~
I listed our liabilities on the low side when I said $60-70 trillion – but hey, what’s a few trillion these days?
from the article above:
“We at the Dallas Fed believe the total is over $99 trillion,” he said in February.
Participant“extremis” coming closer?
China warns Federal Reserve over ‘printing money’
~
I listed our liabilities on the low side when I said $60-70 trillion – but hey, what’s a few trillion these days?
from the article above:
“We at the Dallas Fed believe the total is over $99 trillion,” he said in February.
Participant“extremis” coming closer?
China warns Federal Reserve over ‘printing money’
~
I listed our liabilities on the low side when I said $60-70 trillion – but hey, what’s a few trillion these days?
from the article above:
“We at the Dallas Fed believe the total is over $99 trillion,” he said in February.
-
AuthorPosts
