Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
34f3f3f
Participant[quote=peterb]You may want to consider credit unions as they use a different insurer than the FDIC and seem to be far more conservative with their loands.[/quote]
Tells us more, Peter. I stumbled across this and insurance was up to $250k, but depositors either had to be living in the county or institutional (?). It certainly seemed like an option.
Participant[quote=peterb]You may want to consider credit unions as they use a different insurer than the FDIC and seem to be far more conservative with their loands.[/quote]
Tells us more, Peter. I stumbled across this and insurance was up to $250k, but depositors either had to be living in the county or institutional (?). It certainly seemed like an option.
Participant[quote=peterb]You may want to consider credit unions as they use a different insurer than the FDIC and seem to be far more conservative with their loands.[/quote]
Tells us more, Peter. I stumbled across this and insurance was up to $250k, but depositors either had to be living in the county or institutional (?). It certainly seemed like an option.
Participant[quote=peterb]You may want to consider credit unions as they use a different insurer than the FDIC and seem to be far more conservative with their loands.[/quote]
Tells us more, Peter. I stumbled across this and insurance was up to $250k, but depositors either had to be living in the county or institutional (?). It certainly seemed like an option.
July 15, 2008 at 8:26 AM in reply to: Housing Tracker update – prices about to go over the cliff in San Diego #239557ParticipantBut at what point did (will) yesterday’s 75th percentile become today’s 50th percentile? Are individual prices being charted?
July 15, 2008 at 8:26 AM in reply to: Housing Tracker update – prices about to go over the cliff in San Diego #239696ParticipantBut at what point did (will) yesterday’s 75th percentile become today’s 50th percentile? Are individual prices being charted?
July 15, 2008 at 8:26 AM in reply to: Housing Tracker update – prices about to go over the cliff in San Diego #239699ParticipantBut at what point did (will) yesterday’s 75th percentile become today’s 50th percentile? Are individual prices being charted?
July 15, 2008 at 8:26 AM in reply to: Housing Tracker update – prices about to go over the cliff in San Diego #239753ParticipantBut at what point did (will) yesterday’s 75th percentile become today’s 50th percentile? Are individual prices being charted?
July 15, 2008 at 8:26 AM in reply to: Housing Tracker update – prices about to go over the cliff in San Diego #239761ParticipantBut at what point did (will) yesterday’s 75th percentile become today’s 50th percentile? Are individual prices being charted?
ParticipantGdcox, I think the issue here needs to be scrutinized and people need to be told the truth. The New York Times ran three articles on Sunday, one of which pointed the finger at lobbyists, silencing the competition by monopolist means, congressmen being recruited onto the boards, paying off charities to keep their silence etc. It seems powerful interests were being protected, and a few loners who said this was going to happen unless regulation was tightened were ignored.
BTW, gd, do you like marmite? 🙂
ParticipantGdcox, I think the issue here needs to be scrutinized and people need to be told the truth. The New York Times ran three articles on Sunday, one of which pointed the finger at lobbyists, silencing the competition by monopolist means, congressmen being recruited onto the boards, paying off charities to keep their silence etc. It seems powerful interests were being protected, and a few loners who said this was going to happen unless regulation was tightened were ignored.
BTW, gd, do you like marmite? 🙂
ParticipantGdcox, I think the issue here needs to be scrutinized and people need to be told the truth. The New York Times ran three articles on Sunday, one of which pointed the finger at lobbyists, silencing the competition by monopolist means, congressmen being recruited onto the boards, paying off charities to keep their silence etc. It seems powerful interests were being protected, and a few loners who said this was going to happen unless regulation was tightened were ignored.
BTW, gd, do you like marmite? 🙂
ParticipantGdcox, I think the issue here needs to be scrutinized and people need to be told the truth. The New York Times ran three articles on Sunday, one of which pointed the finger at lobbyists, silencing the competition by monopolist means, congressmen being recruited onto the boards, paying off charities to keep their silence etc. It seems powerful interests were being protected, and a few loners who said this was going to happen unless regulation was tightened were ignored.
BTW, gd, do you like marmite? 🙂
ParticipantGdcox, I think the issue here needs to be scrutinized and people need to be told the truth. The New York Times ran three articles on Sunday, one of which pointed the finger at lobbyists, silencing the competition by monopolist means, congressmen being recruited onto the boards, paying off charities to keep their silence etc. It seems powerful interests were being protected, and a few loners who said this was going to happen unless regulation was tightened were ignored.
BTW, gd, do you like marmite? 🙂
-
AuthorPosts
