- This topic has 150 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 19, 2007 at 3:33 PM #101475November 19, 2007 at 3:34 PM #101327waterboyParticipant
Alex-
Yes, people are posting articles but who is saying they are the word of God or the UT is great now??? I think the only one is you.If you don’t like it then don’t read it. If you think a majority on this site are don’t know what they are talking about then start your own site suggesting that and sharing your opinion. Maybe you can take effort to poke holes in the recent stories or reports.
Bottom Line….Good/Bad/Indifferent, this site and its users have made many question their thoughts and actions regarding real estate.
November 19, 2007 at 3:34 PM #101414waterboyParticipantAlex-
Yes, people are posting articles but who is saying they are the word of God or the UT is great now??? I think the only one is you.If you don’t like it then don’t read it. If you think a majority on this site are don’t know what they are talking about then start your own site suggesting that and sharing your opinion. Maybe you can take effort to poke holes in the recent stories or reports.
Bottom Line….Good/Bad/Indifferent, this site and its users have made many question their thoughts and actions regarding real estate.
November 19, 2007 at 3:34 PM #101425waterboyParticipantAlex-
Yes, people are posting articles but who is saying they are the word of God or the UT is great now??? I think the only one is you.If you don’t like it then don’t read it. If you think a majority on this site are don’t know what they are talking about then start your own site suggesting that and sharing your opinion. Maybe you can take effort to poke holes in the recent stories or reports.
Bottom Line….Good/Bad/Indifferent, this site and its users have made many question their thoughts and actions regarding real estate.
November 19, 2007 at 3:34 PM #101442waterboyParticipantAlex-
Yes, people are posting articles but who is saying they are the word of God or the UT is great now??? I think the only one is you.If you don’t like it then don’t read it. If you think a majority on this site are don’t know what they are talking about then start your own site suggesting that and sharing your opinion. Maybe you can take effort to poke holes in the recent stories or reports.
Bottom Line….Good/Bad/Indifferent, this site and its users have made many question their thoughts and actions regarding real estate.
November 19, 2007 at 3:34 PM #101470waterboyParticipantAlex-
Yes, people are posting articles but who is saying they are the word of God or the UT is great now??? I think the only one is you.If you don’t like it then don’t read it. If you think a majority on this site are don’t know what they are talking about then start your own site suggesting that and sharing your opinion. Maybe you can take effort to poke holes in the recent stories or reports.
Bottom Line….Good/Bad/Indifferent, this site and its users have made many question their thoughts and actions regarding real estate.
November 19, 2007 at 4:12 PM #101343nostradamusParticipantHello, my name is Nostradamus and I’m an affirmaholic.
The fact that the papers are now accepting the bubble’s existence (and slow burst) cannot be ignored. Most media outlets are structured to make people continue watching/reading their media, which means it tells them what they want to hear. Knowing this, we can analyze the current content of the media to better understand when/where/how people will react down the line.
The UT sucks butt and I’ve never ever in 15 years of SD heard a single person say a positive thing about it. I was in the UT when I first came to SD because I discovered some dead people in Torrey Pines… They completely distorted my interview to sensationalize it and since then I never believe anything I hear on any news. Instead, I ask: why are they saying this? What purpose does it serve?
November 19, 2007 at 4:12 PM #101429nostradamusParticipantHello, my name is Nostradamus and I’m an affirmaholic.
The fact that the papers are now accepting the bubble’s existence (and slow burst) cannot be ignored. Most media outlets are structured to make people continue watching/reading their media, which means it tells them what they want to hear. Knowing this, we can analyze the current content of the media to better understand when/where/how people will react down the line.
The UT sucks butt and I’ve never ever in 15 years of SD heard a single person say a positive thing about it. I was in the UT when I first came to SD because I discovered some dead people in Torrey Pines… They completely distorted my interview to sensationalize it and since then I never believe anything I hear on any news. Instead, I ask: why are they saying this? What purpose does it serve?
November 19, 2007 at 4:12 PM #101441nostradamusParticipantHello, my name is Nostradamus and I’m an affirmaholic.
The fact that the papers are now accepting the bubble’s existence (and slow burst) cannot be ignored. Most media outlets are structured to make people continue watching/reading their media, which means it tells them what they want to hear. Knowing this, we can analyze the current content of the media to better understand when/where/how people will react down the line.
The UT sucks butt and I’ve never ever in 15 years of SD heard a single person say a positive thing about it. I was in the UT when I first came to SD because I discovered some dead people in Torrey Pines… They completely distorted my interview to sensationalize it and since then I never believe anything I hear on any news. Instead, I ask: why are they saying this? What purpose does it serve?
November 19, 2007 at 4:12 PM #101457nostradamusParticipantHello, my name is Nostradamus and I’m an affirmaholic.
The fact that the papers are now accepting the bubble’s existence (and slow burst) cannot be ignored. Most media outlets are structured to make people continue watching/reading their media, which means it tells them what they want to hear. Knowing this, we can analyze the current content of the media to better understand when/where/how people will react down the line.
The UT sucks butt and I’ve never ever in 15 years of SD heard a single person say a positive thing about it. I was in the UT when I first came to SD because I discovered some dead people in Torrey Pines… They completely distorted my interview to sensationalize it and since then I never believe anything I hear on any news. Instead, I ask: why are they saying this? What purpose does it serve?
November 19, 2007 at 4:12 PM #101485nostradamusParticipantHello, my name is Nostradamus and I’m an affirmaholic.
The fact that the papers are now accepting the bubble’s existence (and slow burst) cannot be ignored. Most media outlets are structured to make people continue watching/reading their media, which means it tells them what they want to hear. Knowing this, we can analyze the current content of the media to better understand when/where/how people will react down the line.
The UT sucks butt and I’ve never ever in 15 years of SD heard a single person say a positive thing about it. I was in the UT when I first came to SD because I discovered some dead people in Torrey Pines… They completely distorted my interview to sensationalize it and since then I never believe anything I hear on any news. Instead, I ask: why are they saying this? What purpose does it serve?
November 19, 2007 at 4:17 PM #101348kev374ParticipantI don’t even understand your argument. We have always stood by our belief that the prices do not support fundamentals. It’s the media that has finally realized this reality as well. The media is now in agreement with what we have believed since the beginning. Therefore we agree with the media while formerly we disagreed 🙂 Capisce?
November 19, 2007 at 4:17 PM #101434kev374ParticipantI don’t even understand your argument. We have always stood by our belief that the prices do not support fundamentals. It’s the media that has finally realized this reality as well. The media is now in agreement with what we have believed since the beginning. Therefore we agree with the media while formerly we disagreed 🙂 Capisce?
November 19, 2007 at 4:17 PM #101445kev374ParticipantI don’t even understand your argument. We have always stood by our belief that the prices do not support fundamentals. It’s the media that has finally realized this reality as well. The media is now in agreement with what we have believed since the beginning. Therefore we agree with the media while formerly we disagreed 🙂 Capisce?
November 19, 2007 at 4:17 PM #101462kev374ParticipantI don’t even understand your argument. We have always stood by our belief that the prices do not support fundamentals. It’s the media that has finally realized this reality as well. The media is now in agreement with what we have believed since the beginning. Therefore we agree with the media while formerly we disagreed 🙂 Capisce?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.