Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Wild pricing thread
- This topic has 180 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 11 months ago by
sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 27, 2010 at 7:49 PM #573256June 27, 2010 at 8:00 PM #572256
sdrealtor
ParticipantNot my point, it sells to a different kind of buyer who values a property differently. Investors value purely on ROI. Homeowners get a significant return by living in the home that investors do not hence they tend to value things significantly higher than an investor would. Its apples and oranges.
June 27, 2010 at 8:00 PM #572353sdrealtor
ParticipantNot my point, it sells to a different kind of buyer who values a property differently. Investors value purely on ROI. Homeowners get a significant return by living in the home that investors do not hence they tend to value things significantly higher than an investor would. Its apples and oranges.
June 27, 2010 at 8:00 PM #572864sdrealtor
ParticipantNot my point, it sells to a different kind of buyer who values a property differently. Investors value purely on ROI. Homeowners get a significant return by living in the home that investors do not hence they tend to value things significantly higher than an investor would. Its apples and oranges.
June 27, 2010 at 8:00 PM #572970sdrealtor
ParticipantNot my point, it sells to a different kind of buyer who values a property differently. Investors value purely on ROI. Homeowners get a significant return by living in the home that investors do not hence they tend to value things significantly higher than an investor would. Its apples and oranges.
June 27, 2010 at 8:00 PM #573261sdrealtor
ParticipantNot my point, it sells to a different kind of buyer who values a property differently. Investors value purely on ROI. Homeowners get a significant return by living in the home that investors do not hence they tend to value things significantly higher than an investor would. Its apples and oranges.
June 27, 2010 at 8:37 PM #572261jpinpb
ParticipantMaybe I’m just an exception. I’d consider purchasing units, living in one and renting the other out. But I tend to think that if I would do that, others might also. I wouldn’t make a blanket statment that a homeowner values things differently and wouldn’t purchase units.
June 27, 2010 at 8:37 PM #572357jpinpb
ParticipantMaybe I’m just an exception. I’d consider purchasing units, living in one and renting the other out. But I tend to think that if I would do that, others might also. I wouldn’t make a blanket statment that a homeowner values things differently and wouldn’t purchase units.
June 27, 2010 at 8:37 PM #572869jpinpb
ParticipantMaybe I’m just an exception. I’d consider purchasing units, living in one and renting the other out. But I tend to think that if I would do that, others might also. I wouldn’t make a blanket statment that a homeowner values things differently and wouldn’t purchase units.
June 27, 2010 at 8:37 PM #572976jpinpb
ParticipantMaybe I’m just an exception. I’d consider purchasing units, living in one and renting the other out. But I tend to think that if I would do that, others might also. I wouldn’t make a blanket statment that a homeowner values things differently and wouldn’t purchase units.
June 27, 2010 at 8:37 PM #573266jpinpb
ParticipantMaybe I’m just an exception. I’d consider purchasing units, living in one and renting the other out. But I tend to think that if I would do that, others might also. I wouldn’t make a blanket statment that a homeowner values things differently and wouldn’t purchase units.
June 27, 2010 at 8:46 PM #572271jpinpb
ParticipantBut since sdr doesn’t like my examples, I’ll add this one 3642 Arizona not on a busy street, 3/2, LP $599,000 to $629,000, PPSF: $470.
That would be still be better than Texas or Villa Terrace, IMO. Hasn’t closed yet, but same LP as the others.
June 27, 2010 at 8:46 PM #572367jpinpb
ParticipantBut since sdr doesn’t like my examples, I’ll add this one 3642 Arizona not on a busy street, 3/2, LP $599,000 to $629,000, PPSF: $470.
That would be still be better than Texas or Villa Terrace, IMO. Hasn’t closed yet, but same LP as the others.
June 27, 2010 at 8:46 PM #572879jpinpb
ParticipantBut since sdr doesn’t like my examples, I’ll add this one 3642 Arizona not on a busy street, 3/2, LP $599,000 to $629,000, PPSF: $470.
That would be still be better than Texas or Villa Terrace, IMO. Hasn’t closed yet, but same LP as the others.
June 27, 2010 at 8:46 PM #572986jpinpb
ParticipantBut since sdr doesn’t like my examples, I’ll add this one 3642 Arizona not on a busy street, 3/2, LP $599,000 to $629,000, PPSF: $470.
That would be still be better than Texas or Villa Terrace, IMO. Hasn’t closed yet, but same LP as the others.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.