- This topic has 110 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by
Shadowfax.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 3, 2008 at 12:07 AM #251298August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251083
Shadowfax
ParticipantPlumosa is also one of the best micro-areas of Pt. Loma. PL is an older neighborhood with really interesting topography and older-neighborhood charm (not tract home development feel like MM, CV or CVR). Spouse and I were REALLY trying to buy in PL back in ’98 or ’99 and it was already WAAY out of our range even back then and we were professional DINKS back then.
The REALLY nice areas on the top of the peninsula will have views of water in both directions…can’t get that in Texas or Barstow. Schools are crappy though. We hope it comes down too.
August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251242Shadowfax
ParticipantPlumosa is also one of the best micro-areas of Pt. Loma. PL is an older neighborhood with really interesting topography and older-neighborhood charm (not tract home development feel like MM, CV or CVR). Spouse and I were REALLY trying to buy in PL back in ’98 or ’99 and it was already WAAY out of our range even back then and we were professional DINKS back then.
The REALLY nice areas on the top of the peninsula will have views of water in both directions…can’t get that in Texas or Barstow. Schools are crappy though. We hope it comes down too.
August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251250Shadowfax
ParticipantPlumosa is also one of the best micro-areas of Pt. Loma. PL is an older neighborhood with really interesting topography and older-neighborhood charm (not tract home development feel like MM, CV or CVR). Spouse and I were REALLY trying to buy in PL back in ’98 or ’99 and it was already WAAY out of our range even back then and we were professional DINKS back then.
The REALLY nice areas on the top of the peninsula will have views of water in both directions…can’t get that in Texas or Barstow. Schools are crappy though. We hope it comes down too.
August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251306Shadowfax
ParticipantPlumosa is also one of the best micro-areas of Pt. Loma. PL is an older neighborhood with really interesting topography and older-neighborhood charm (not tract home development feel like MM, CV or CVR). Spouse and I were REALLY trying to buy in PL back in ’98 or ’99 and it was already WAAY out of our range even back then and we were professional DINKS back then.
The REALLY nice areas on the top of the peninsula will have views of water in both directions…can’t get that in Texas or Barstow. Schools are crappy though. We hope it comes down too.
August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251313Shadowfax
ParticipantPlumosa is also one of the best micro-areas of Pt. Loma. PL is an older neighborhood with really interesting topography and older-neighborhood charm (not tract home development feel like MM, CV or CVR). Spouse and I were REALLY trying to buy in PL back in ’98 or ’99 and it was already WAAY out of our range even back then and we were professional DINKS back then.
The REALLY nice areas on the top of the peninsula will have views of water in both directions…can’t get that in Texas or Barstow. Schools are crappy though. We hope it comes down too.
August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251088Shadowfax
Participantdeleted
August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251247Shadowfax
Participantdeleted
August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251255Shadowfax
Participantdeleted
August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251311Shadowfax
Participantdeleted
August 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM #251319Shadowfax
Participantdeleted
August 3, 2008 at 10:47 AM #251208sdrealtor
ParticipantI guess it’s been covered but Pt Loma is expensive because its not Texas or Sacto.
August 3, 2008 at 10:47 AM #251367sdrealtor
ParticipantI guess it’s been covered but Pt Loma is expensive because its not Texas or Sacto.
August 3, 2008 at 10:47 AM #251375sdrealtor
ParticipantI guess it’s been covered but Pt Loma is expensive because its not Texas or Sacto.
August 3, 2008 at 10:47 AM #251432sdrealtor
ParticipantI guess it’s been covered but Pt Loma is expensive because its not Texas or Sacto.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.