Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Why can I not get a loan?
- This topic has 735 replies, 51 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by davelj.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 21, 2009 at 8:35 PM #333312January 21, 2009 at 10:06 PM #332835DWCAPParticipant
[quote=sdrealtor]FWIW, I heard there is a good chance the conforming limit in San Diego could be back at 697K in about 60 days.[/quote]
Great! That way the taxpayers can give welfare to both the poor and the rich. I guess the rich pay the most taxes, they should get subsidies too right? Wouldnt want any of those Scummy middle managers making it inside the gates.
January 21, 2009 at 10:06 PM #333170DWCAPParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]FWIW, I heard there is a good chance the conforming limit in San Diego could be back at 697K in about 60 days.[/quote]
Great! That way the taxpayers can give welfare to both the poor and the rich. I guess the rich pay the most taxes, they should get subsidies too right? Wouldnt want any of those Scummy middle managers making it inside the gates.
January 21, 2009 at 10:06 PM #333252DWCAPParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]FWIW, I heard there is a good chance the conforming limit in San Diego could be back at 697K in about 60 days.[/quote]
Great! That way the taxpayers can give welfare to both the poor and the rich. I guess the rich pay the most taxes, they should get subsidies too right? Wouldnt want any of those Scummy middle managers making it inside the gates.
January 21, 2009 at 10:06 PM #333279DWCAPParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]FWIW, I heard there is a good chance the conforming limit in San Diego could be back at 697K in about 60 days.[/quote]
Great! That way the taxpayers can give welfare to both the poor and the rich. I guess the rich pay the most taxes, they should get subsidies too right? Wouldnt want any of those Scummy middle managers making it inside the gates.
January 21, 2009 at 10:06 PM #333363DWCAPParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]FWIW, I heard there is a good chance the conforming limit in San Diego could be back at 697K in about 60 days.[/quote]
Great! That way the taxpayers can give welfare to both the poor and the rich. I guess the rich pay the most taxes, they should get subsidies too right? Wouldnt want any of those Scummy middle managers making it inside the gates.
January 21, 2009 at 10:59 PM #332875temeculaguyParticipantAs the official scorekeeper for all non political spats, davelj is ahead because he used the word “cogent” correctly in a post. Bravo!!! Now call your English professor and thank them.
CBAD, while not involved in a spat wins the huge post of the thread for the line “Can’t we all get a loan,” to steal a Jim Rome phrase, that was the epic call of the day.
And finally, Allan my apologies in advance but you served up a softball….
Allan said “Speaking solely of Southern California, it goes without saying and often without remark that we live in a very materialistic section of the US. People are judged by their zip code, their cars, their clothes and their “wealth” (which generally means they’re leveraged to their eyeballs).”
This is entirely untrue..I am a second generation native Southern Californian and I do not judge people using any of these parameters. I only judge based on breast size and butt shape. Then again I’m a little more refined than most.
January 21, 2009 at 10:59 PM #333210temeculaguyParticipantAs the official scorekeeper for all non political spats, davelj is ahead because he used the word “cogent” correctly in a post. Bravo!!! Now call your English professor and thank them.
CBAD, while not involved in a spat wins the huge post of the thread for the line “Can’t we all get a loan,” to steal a Jim Rome phrase, that was the epic call of the day.
And finally, Allan my apologies in advance but you served up a softball….
Allan said “Speaking solely of Southern California, it goes without saying and often without remark that we live in a very materialistic section of the US. People are judged by their zip code, their cars, their clothes and their “wealth” (which generally means they’re leveraged to their eyeballs).”
This is entirely untrue..I am a second generation native Southern Californian and I do not judge people using any of these parameters. I only judge based on breast size and butt shape. Then again I’m a little more refined than most.
January 21, 2009 at 10:59 PM #333292temeculaguyParticipantAs the official scorekeeper for all non political spats, davelj is ahead because he used the word “cogent” correctly in a post. Bravo!!! Now call your English professor and thank them.
CBAD, while not involved in a spat wins the huge post of the thread for the line “Can’t we all get a loan,” to steal a Jim Rome phrase, that was the epic call of the day.
And finally, Allan my apologies in advance but you served up a softball….
Allan said “Speaking solely of Southern California, it goes without saying and often without remark that we live in a very materialistic section of the US. People are judged by their zip code, their cars, their clothes and their “wealth” (which generally means they’re leveraged to their eyeballs).”
This is entirely untrue..I am a second generation native Southern Californian and I do not judge people using any of these parameters. I only judge based on breast size and butt shape. Then again I’m a little more refined than most.
January 21, 2009 at 10:59 PM #333320temeculaguyParticipantAs the official scorekeeper for all non political spats, davelj is ahead because he used the word “cogent” correctly in a post. Bravo!!! Now call your English professor and thank them.
CBAD, while not involved in a spat wins the huge post of the thread for the line “Can’t we all get a loan,” to steal a Jim Rome phrase, that was the epic call of the day.
And finally, Allan my apologies in advance but you served up a softball….
Allan said “Speaking solely of Southern California, it goes without saying and often without remark that we live in a very materialistic section of the US. People are judged by their zip code, their cars, their clothes and their “wealth” (which generally means they’re leveraged to their eyeballs).”
This is entirely untrue..I am a second generation native Southern Californian and I do not judge people using any of these parameters. I only judge based on breast size and butt shape. Then again I’m a little more refined than most.
January 21, 2009 at 10:59 PM #333403temeculaguyParticipantAs the official scorekeeper for all non political spats, davelj is ahead because he used the word “cogent” correctly in a post. Bravo!!! Now call your English professor and thank them.
CBAD, while not involved in a spat wins the huge post of the thread for the line “Can’t we all get a loan,” to steal a Jim Rome phrase, that was the epic call of the day.
And finally, Allan my apologies in advance but you served up a softball….
Allan said “Speaking solely of Southern California, it goes without saying and often without remark that we live in a very materialistic section of the US. People are judged by their zip code, their cars, their clothes and their “wealth” (which generally means they’re leveraged to their eyeballs).”
This is entirely untrue..I am a second generation native Southern Californian and I do not judge people using any of these parameters. I only judge based on breast size and butt shape. Then again I’m a little more refined than most.
January 22, 2009 at 1:52 AM #332905CA renterParticipantdavelj wrote:
Yeah, a defining characteristic of real smart folks like yourself is that they’re petrified of competition in their labor market to the extent that they’d prefer to unionize rather than pit their own capabilities against those of others in the free market.
—————————But when corporations use patent law and/or buy out their competition in order to monopolize an industry, that’s being “smart,” right? Perhaps it’s smart when these corporations move their manufacturing facilities overseas so they can drive down prices and force out companies that manufacture in the U.S.
We once had quality products that lasted a lifetime, produced by well-paid, skilled employees. Now, we get toxic, plastic crap from China that fills our landfills because it needs to be replaced every six months.
You’re implying that unionized workers are afraid to compete with other workers based on the merit of their skill or quality of product produced. That’s not the case at all. This is not a competition based on abilities, it’s a competition based only on wages. If you’re suggesting U.S. workers should embrace working for third-world wages, feel free to lead the way. You go first.
It’s nice to know these corporations (and the politicians they pay off) are so “smart”! Hooray for the “free” (if you have enough money to drown your competition in lawsuits and line the pockets of politicians) market!
January 22, 2009 at 1:52 AM #333241CA renterParticipantdavelj wrote:
Yeah, a defining characteristic of real smart folks like yourself is that they’re petrified of competition in their labor market to the extent that they’d prefer to unionize rather than pit their own capabilities against those of others in the free market.
—————————But when corporations use patent law and/or buy out their competition in order to monopolize an industry, that’s being “smart,” right? Perhaps it’s smart when these corporations move their manufacturing facilities overseas so they can drive down prices and force out companies that manufacture in the U.S.
We once had quality products that lasted a lifetime, produced by well-paid, skilled employees. Now, we get toxic, plastic crap from China that fills our landfills because it needs to be replaced every six months.
You’re implying that unionized workers are afraid to compete with other workers based on the merit of their skill or quality of product produced. That’s not the case at all. This is not a competition based on abilities, it’s a competition based only on wages. If you’re suggesting U.S. workers should embrace working for third-world wages, feel free to lead the way. You go first.
It’s nice to know these corporations (and the politicians they pay off) are so “smart”! Hooray for the “free” (if you have enough money to drown your competition in lawsuits and line the pockets of politicians) market!
January 22, 2009 at 1:52 AM #333322CA renterParticipantdavelj wrote:
Yeah, a defining characteristic of real smart folks like yourself is that they’re petrified of competition in their labor market to the extent that they’d prefer to unionize rather than pit their own capabilities against those of others in the free market.
—————————But when corporations use patent law and/or buy out their competition in order to monopolize an industry, that’s being “smart,” right? Perhaps it’s smart when these corporations move their manufacturing facilities overseas so they can drive down prices and force out companies that manufacture in the U.S.
We once had quality products that lasted a lifetime, produced by well-paid, skilled employees. Now, we get toxic, plastic crap from China that fills our landfills because it needs to be replaced every six months.
You’re implying that unionized workers are afraid to compete with other workers based on the merit of their skill or quality of product produced. That’s not the case at all. This is not a competition based on abilities, it’s a competition based only on wages. If you’re suggesting U.S. workers should embrace working for third-world wages, feel free to lead the way. You go first.
It’s nice to know these corporations (and the politicians they pay off) are so “smart”! Hooray for the “free” (if you have enough money to drown your competition in lawsuits and line the pockets of politicians) market!
January 22, 2009 at 1:52 AM #333350CA renterParticipantdavelj wrote:
Yeah, a defining characteristic of real smart folks like yourself is that they’re petrified of competition in their labor market to the extent that they’d prefer to unionize rather than pit their own capabilities against those of others in the free market.
—————————But when corporations use patent law and/or buy out their competition in order to monopolize an industry, that’s being “smart,” right? Perhaps it’s smart when these corporations move their manufacturing facilities overseas so they can drive down prices and force out companies that manufacture in the U.S.
We once had quality products that lasted a lifetime, produced by well-paid, skilled employees. Now, we get toxic, plastic crap from China that fills our landfills because it needs to be replaced every six months.
You’re implying that unionized workers are afraid to compete with other workers based on the merit of their skill or quality of product produced. That’s not the case at all. This is not a competition based on abilities, it’s a competition based only on wages. If you’re suggesting U.S. workers should embrace working for third-world wages, feel free to lead the way. You go first.
It’s nice to know these corporations (and the politicians they pay off) are so “smart”! Hooray for the “free” (if you have enough money to drown your competition in lawsuits and line the pockets of politicians) market!
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.