- This topic has 1,860 replies, 31 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 7 months ago by
UCGal.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 8, 2010 at 7:36 AM #603110September 8, 2010 at 8:32 AM #602058
sdrealtor
ParticipantCAR
I beleive you are off, way off on both of your dates. Prices rose until 1990 and in 1999 I sold a property in 92024 for a price far beyond prior peak levels. It was sold at an average price for the area which substantiates prices recovering well before 2000. It was nothing special, just an average encinitas townhome.update: Just did some poking around tax records. It looks like prices took a big jump starting in 1988 and through 1990 in 92024. Looks like they had recovered by late 96/early 97.
September 8, 2010 at 8:32 AM #602149sdrealtor
ParticipantCAR
I beleive you are off, way off on both of your dates. Prices rose until 1990 and in 1999 I sold a property in 92024 for a price far beyond prior peak levels. It was sold at an average price for the area which substantiates prices recovering well before 2000. It was nothing special, just an average encinitas townhome.update: Just did some poking around tax records. It looks like prices took a big jump starting in 1988 and through 1990 in 92024. Looks like they had recovered by late 96/early 97.
September 8, 2010 at 8:32 AM #602696sdrealtor
ParticipantCAR
I beleive you are off, way off on both of your dates. Prices rose until 1990 and in 1999 I sold a property in 92024 for a price far beyond prior peak levels. It was sold at an average price for the area which substantiates prices recovering well before 2000. It was nothing special, just an average encinitas townhome.update: Just did some poking around tax records. It looks like prices took a big jump starting in 1988 and through 1990 in 92024. Looks like they had recovered by late 96/early 97.
September 8, 2010 at 8:32 AM #602802sdrealtor
ParticipantCAR
I beleive you are off, way off on both of your dates. Prices rose until 1990 and in 1999 I sold a property in 92024 for a price far beyond prior peak levels. It was sold at an average price for the area which substantiates prices recovering well before 2000. It was nothing special, just an average encinitas townhome.update: Just did some poking around tax records. It looks like prices took a big jump starting in 1988 and through 1990 in 92024. Looks like they had recovered by late 96/early 97.
September 8, 2010 at 8:32 AM #603120sdrealtor
ParticipantCAR
I beleive you are off, way off on both of your dates. Prices rose until 1990 and in 1999 I sold a property in 92024 for a price far beyond prior peak levels. It was sold at an average price for the area which substantiates prices recovering well before 2000. It was nothing special, just an average encinitas townhome.update: Just did some poking around tax records. It looks like prices took a big jump starting in 1988 and through 1990 in 92024. Looks like they had recovered by late 96/early 97.
September 8, 2010 at 8:36 AM #602053sdrealtor
Participantnj
I think we would both agree that Detroit is an outlier and perhaps the area hardest hit by urban decay. Certainly not a good yardstick to compare a place like that that has declined incredibly with an area that has improved so much.Based upon the CPI figures you quoted it sounds like the house still has potential downside if it sells for the asking price(10% max).
OK, more information. The house is in 92024 which has grown in desiareability over the last 22 years. That should be reflected in incomes with wealthier folks migrating in as well as increasing wages for all longtime residents. Anyone able to dig up median HH income in 92024 in 1988 and 2010.
September 8, 2010 at 8:36 AM #602144sdrealtor
Participantnj
I think we would both agree that Detroit is an outlier and perhaps the area hardest hit by urban decay. Certainly not a good yardstick to compare a place like that that has declined incredibly with an area that has improved so much.Based upon the CPI figures you quoted it sounds like the house still has potential downside if it sells for the asking price(10% max).
OK, more information. The house is in 92024 which has grown in desiareability over the last 22 years. That should be reflected in incomes with wealthier folks migrating in as well as increasing wages for all longtime residents. Anyone able to dig up median HH income in 92024 in 1988 and 2010.
September 8, 2010 at 8:36 AM #602691sdrealtor
Participantnj
I think we would both agree that Detroit is an outlier and perhaps the area hardest hit by urban decay. Certainly not a good yardstick to compare a place like that that has declined incredibly with an area that has improved so much.Based upon the CPI figures you quoted it sounds like the house still has potential downside if it sells for the asking price(10% max).
OK, more information. The house is in 92024 which has grown in desiareability over the last 22 years. That should be reflected in incomes with wealthier folks migrating in as well as increasing wages for all longtime residents. Anyone able to dig up median HH income in 92024 in 1988 and 2010.
September 8, 2010 at 8:36 AM #602797sdrealtor
Participantnj
I think we would both agree that Detroit is an outlier and perhaps the area hardest hit by urban decay. Certainly not a good yardstick to compare a place like that that has declined incredibly with an area that has improved so much.Based upon the CPI figures you quoted it sounds like the house still has potential downside if it sells for the asking price(10% max).
OK, more information. The house is in 92024 which has grown in desiareability over the last 22 years. That should be reflected in incomes with wealthier folks migrating in as well as increasing wages for all longtime residents. Anyone able to dig up median HH income in 92024 in 1988 and 2010.
September 8, 2010 at 8:36 AM #603115sdrealtor
Participantnj
I think we would both agree that Detroit is an outlier and perhaps the area hardest hit by urban decay. Certainly not a good yardstick to compare a place like that that has declined incredibly with an area that has improved so much.Based upon the CPI figures you quoted it sounds like the house still has potential downside if it sells for the asking price(10% max).
OK, more information. The house is in 92024 which has grown in desiareability over the last 22 years. That should be reflected in incomes with wealthier folks migrating in as well as increasing wages for all longtime residents. Anyone able to dig up median HH income in 92024 in 1988 and 2010.
September 8, 2010 at 9:18 AM #602083njtosd
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]nj
I think we would both agree that Detroit is an outlier and perhaps the area hardest hit by urban decay. Certainly not a good yardstick to compare a place like that that has declined incredibly with an area that has improved so much.Based upon the CPI figures you quoted it sounds like the house still has potential downside if it sells for the asking price(10% max).
OK, more information. The house is in 92024 which has grown in desiareability over the last 22 years. That should be reflected in incomes with wealthier folks migrating in as well as increasing wages for all longtime residents. Anyone able to dig up median HH income in 92024 in 1988 and 2010.[/quote]
Regarding Detroit – just using it as an extreme example to illustrate a point. Median HH income for 92024 in 1988 was about $32.400; in 2008 (most recent I could find) in was about $82,200. If you want to take into account the CPI, it seems the adjusted median HH income has increased about 50%.
September 8, 2010 at 9:18 AM #602174njtosd
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]nj
I think we would both agree that Detroit is an outlier and perhaps the area hardest hit by urban decay. Certainly not a good yardstick to compare a place like that that has declined incredibly with an area that has improved so much.Based upon the CPI figures you quoted it sounds like the house still has potential downside if it sells for the asking price(10% max).
OK, more information. The house is in 92024 which has grown in desiareability over the last 22 years. That should be reflected in incomes with wealthier folks migrating in as well as increasing wages for all longtime residents. Anyone able to dig up median HH income in 92024 in 1988 and 2010.[/quote]
Regarding Detroit – just using it as an extreme example to illustrate a point. Median HH income for 92024 in 1988 was about $32.400; in 2008 (most recent I could find) in was about $82,200. If you want to take into account the CPI, it seems the adjusted median HH income has increased about 50%.
September 8, 2010 at 9:18 AM #602721njtosd
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]nj
I think we would both agree that Detroit is an outlier and perhaps the area hardest hit by urban decay. Certainly not a good yardstick to compare a place like that that has declined incredibly with an area that has improved so much.Based upon the CPI figures you quoted it sounds like the house still has potential downside if it sells for the asking price(10% max).
OK, more information. The house is in 92024 which has grown in desiareability over the last 22 years. That should be reflected in incomes with wealthier folks migrating in as well as increasing wages for all longtime residents. Anyone able to dig up median HH income in 92024 in 1988 and 2010.[/quote]
Regarding Detroit – just using it as an extreme example to illustrate a point. Median HH income for 92024 in 1988 was about $32.400; in 2008 (most recent I could find) in was about $82,200. If you want to take into account the CPI, it seems the adjusted median HH income has increased about 50%.
September 8, 2010 at 9:18 AM #602827njtosd
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]nj
I think we would both agree that Detroit is an outlier and perhaps the area hardest hit by urban decay. Certainly not a good yardstick to compare a place like that that has declined incredibly with an area that has improved so much.Based upon the CPI figures you quoted it sounds like the house still has potential downside if it sells for the asking price(10% max).
OK, more information. The house is in 92024 which has grown in desiareability over the last 22 years. That should be reflected in incomes with wealthier folks migrating in as well as increasing wages for all longtime residents. Anyone able to dig up median HH income in 92024 in 1988 and 2010.[/quote]
Regarding Detroit – just using it as an extreme example to illustrate a point. Median HH income for 92024 in 1988 was about $32.400; in 2008 (most recent I could find) in was about $82,200. If you want to take into account the CPI, it seems the adjusted median HH income has increased about 50%.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.