Ultimate Inversion

[briansd1]

Ayn Rand was also a very sexually liberated woman, not exactly in the religious ideals of today’s Republicans.

Dave put it well. She was an intellectual and a little eccentric but she had some great ideas.

Of the two major parties, Democratic or Republican, I find find the Democratic party more suitable to me because the Democrats are more flexible in terms of lifestyles and morals. The Republicans are simply too rigid.

I admire Ayn Rand because she was blunt and spoke her mind.

Interesting interview about Ayn Rand:
http://www.hereandnow.org/2009/07/rundown-71/#2

[Anonymous]

[quote=Casca]
Yet more vilification from the sock based on reductio ad absurdum. Rich really should unmask these posers.[/quote]

What should your tax rate be and who should make that decision?

[Anonymous]

[quote=Casca]
Yet more vilification from the sock based on reductio ad absurdum. Rich really should unmask these posers.[/quote]

What should your tax rate be and who should make that decision?

[Anonymous]

[quote=Casca]
Yet more vilification from the sock based on reductio ad absurdum. Rich really should unmask these posers.[/quote]

What should your tax rate be and who should make that decision?

[Anonymous]

[quote=Casca]
Yet more vilification from the sock based on reductio ad absurdum. Rich really should unmask these posers.[/quote]

What should your tax rate be and who should make that decision?

[Anonymous]

[quote=Casca]
Yet more vilification from the sock based on reductio ad absurdum. Rich really should unmask these posers.[/quote]

What should your tax rate be and who should make that decision?

[ybitz]

[quote=IForget][quote=Casca]
Yet more vilification from the sock based on reductio ad absurdum. Rich really should unmask these posers.[/quote]

What should your tax rate be and who should make that decision?[/quote]

You and your fellow citizens and our elected representatives? Democracy…seems like a fairly good model to me.

[ybitz]

[quote=IForget][quote=Casca]
Yet more vilification from the sock based on reductio ad absurdum. Rich really should unmask these posers.[/quote]

What should your tax rate be and who should make that decision?[/quote]

You and your fellow citizens and our elected representatives? Democracy…seems like a fairly good model to me.

[ybitz]

[quote=IForget][quote=Casca]
Yet more vilification from the sock based on reductio ad absurdum. Rich really should unmask these posers.[/quote]

What should your tax rate be and who should make that decision?[/quote]

You and your fellow citizens and our elected representatives? Democracy…seems like a fairly good model to me.

[ybitz]

[quote=IForget][quote=Casca]
Yet more vilification from the sock based on reductio ad absurdum. Rich really should unmask these posers.[/quote]

What should your tax rate be and who should make that decision?[/quote]

You and your fellow citizens and our elected representatives? Democracy…seems like a fairly good model to me.

[ybitz]

[quote=IForget][quote=Casca]
Yet more vilification from the sock based on reductio ad absurdum. Rich really should unmask these posers.[/quote]

What should your tax rate be and who should make that decision?[/quote]

You and your fellow citizens and our elected representatives? Democracy…seems like a fairly good model to me.

[patb]

[quote=Casca]
I see who’s frothing at the mouth. Having taken the oath several times in my life to protect and defend the constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic, I take umbrage with those who seek to destroy the foundational principles of our nation for mere do-gooding. If the plight of the poor vexes you, vote with your checkbook, but leave your neighbor’s be.[/quote]

I took an oath to defend this country too.
Nowhere in that oath, was anything about preserving
profits for corporations. In fact, I read the constitution, it mentions Congress, the People and the states over 200 times. It never mentions corporations.

[patb]

[quote=Casca]
I see who’s frothing at the mouth. Having taken the oath several times in my life to protect and defend the constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic, I take umbrage with those who seek to destroy the foundational principles of our nation for mere do-gooding. If the plight of the poor vexes you, vote with your checkbook, but leave your neighbor’s be.[/quote]

I took an oath to defend this country too.
Nowhere in that oath, was anything about preserving
profits for corporations. In fact, I read the constitution, it mentions Congress, the People and the states over 200 times. It never mentions corporations.

[patb]

[quote=Casca]
I see who’s frothing at the mouth. Having taken the oath several times in my life to protect and defend the constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic, I take umbrage with those who seek to destroy the foundational principles of our nation for mere do-gooding. If the plight of the poor vexes you, vote with your checkbook, but leave your neighbor’s be.[/quote]

I took an oath to defend this country too.
Nowhere in that oath, was anything about preserving
profits for corporations. In fact, I read the constitution, it mentions Congress, the People and the states over 200 times. It never mentions corporations.

[patb]

[quote=Casca]
I see who’s frothing at the mouth. Having taken the oath several times in my life to protect and defend the constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic, I take umbrage with those who seek to destroy the foundational principles of our nation for mere do-gooding. If the plight of the poor vexes you, vote with your checkbook, but leave your neighbor’s be.[/quote]

I took an oath to defend this country too.
Nowhere in that oath, was anything about preserving
profits for corporations. In fact, I read the constitution, it mentions Congress, the People and the states over 200 times. It never mentions corporations.

[Author]

Posts