- This topic has 165 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 4 months ago by
NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 2, 2007 at 11:09 PM #107771December 2, 2007 at 11:09 PM #107870
GoUSC
ParticipantUber-bear? Sounds more like communist to me.
And bravo on wishing for a big deep major recession. That really turns out great for the people that lose their jobs.
Most of us want housing to better match incomes but that’s about where it stops. I find it amazing that some people actually WISH for a deep recession.
December 2, 2007 at 11:09 PM #107903GoUSC
ParticipantUber-bear? Sounds more like communist to me.
And bravo on wishing for a big deep major recession. That really turns out great for the people that lose their jobs.
Most of us want housing to better match incomes but that’s about where it stops. I find it amazing that some people actually WISH for a deep recession.
December 2, 2007 at 11:09 PM #107912GoUSC
ParticipantUber-bear? Sounds more like communist to me.
And bravo on wishing for a big deep major recession. That really turns out great for the people that lose their jobs.
Most of us want housing to better match incomes but that’s about where it stops. I find it amazing that some people actually WISH for a deep recession.
December 2, 2007 at 11:09 PM #107925GoUSC
ParticipantUber-bear? Sounds more like communist to me.
And bravo on wishing for a big deep major recession. That really turns out great for the people that lose their jobs.
Most of us want housing to better match incomes but that’s about where it stops. I find it amazing that some people actually WISH for a deep recession.
December 2, 2007 at 11:40 PM #107790scaredyclassic
ParticipantThe more we “work” the more we destroy the earth. the more we consume the more we destroy the earth. The more we build the more we destroy the earth. Shrinking our carbon footprint involves receding. getting smaller. less is more. Not communist. minimalist. there will be other less destructive jobs. we cannot go on liek this forever. it is not sustainable. like housing prices.
Drink Heavily.
December 2, 2007 at 11:40 PM #107891scaredyclassic
ParticipantThe more we “work” the more we destroy the earth. the more we consume the more we destroy the earth. The more we build the more we destroy the earth. Shrinking our carbon footprint involves receding. getting smaller. less is more. Not communist. minimalist. there will be other less destructive jobs. we cannot go on liek this forever. it is not sustainable. like housing prices.
Drink Heavily.
December 2, 2007 at 11:40 PM #107923scaredyclassic
ParticipantThe more we “work” the more we destroy the earth. the more we consume the more we destroy the earth. The more we build the more we destroy the earth. Shrinking our carbon footprint involves receding. getting smaller. less is more. Not communist. minimalist. there will be other less destructive jobs. we cannot go on liek this forever. it is not sustainable. like housing prices.
Drink Heavily.
December 2, 2007 at 11:40 PM #107931scaredyclassic
ParticipantThe more we “work” the more we destroy the earth. the more we consume the more we destroy the earth. The more we build the more we destroy the earth. Shrinking our carbon footprint involves receding. getting smaller. less is more. Not communist. minimalist. there will be other less destructive jobs. we cannot go on liek this forever. it is not sustainable. like housing prices.
Drink Heavily.
December 2, 2007 at 11:40 PM #107945scaredyclassic
ParticipantThe more we “work” the more we destroy the earth. the more we consume the more we destroy the earth. The more we build the more we destroy the earth. Shrinking our carbon footprint involves receding. getting smaller. less is more. Not communist. minimalist. there will be other less destructive jobs. we cannot go on liek this forever. it is not sustainable. like housing prices.
Drink Heavily.
December 2, 2007 at 11:55 PM #107804patientlywaiting
ParticipantA worldwide one-child policy will achieve what you’re hoping for.
If the ultra right-wingers would support free birth-control in the developing world we wouldn’t have so many illegal aliens looking for jobs.
December 2, 2007 at 11:55 PM #107906patientlywaiting
ParticipantA worldwide one-child policy will achieve what you’re hoping for.
If the ultra right-wingers would support free birth-control in the developing world we wouldn’t have so many illegal aliens looking for jobs.
December 2, 2007 at 11:55 PM #107938patientlywaiting
ParticipantA worldwide one-child policy will achieve what you’re hoping for.
If the ultra right-wingers would support free birth-control in the developing world we wouldn’t have so many illegal aliens looking for jobs.
December 2, 2007 at 11:55 PM #107946patientlywaiting
ParticipantA worldwide one-child policy will achieve what you’re hoping for.
If the ultra right-wingers would support free birth-control in the developing world we wouldn’t have so many illegal aliens looking for jobs.
December 2, 2007 at 11:55 PM #107960patientlywaiting
ParticipantA worldwide one-child policy will achieve what you’re hoping for.
If the ultra right-wingers would support free birth-control in the developing world we wouldn’t have so many illegal aliens looking for jobs.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.