- This topic has 555 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by
scaredyclassic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 7, 2009 at 3:16 PM #492304December 7, 2009 at 4:24 PM #491460
Anonymous
GuestThe problem with Tiger Woods is Tiger’s _________.
6 words or less give it a shot. The winner gets the exclusive rights to mentioning that paper hanging SOB’s name that will put an end to this madness!
December 7, 2009 at 4:24 PM #491626Anonymous
GuestThe problem with Tiger Woods is Tiger’s _________.
6 words or less give it a shot. The winner gets the exclusive rights to mentioning that paper hanging SOB’s name that will put an end to this madness!
December 7, 2009 at 4:24 PM #492009Anonymous
GuestThe problem with Tiger Woods is Tiger’s _________.
6 words or less give it a shot. The winner gets the exclusive rights to mentioning that paper hanging SOB’s name that will put an end to this madness!
December 7, 2009 at 4:24 PM #492096Anonymous
GuestThe problem with Tiger Woods is Tiger’s _________.
6 words or less give it a shot. The winner gets the exclusive rights to mentioning that paper hanging SOB’s name that will put an end to this madness!
December 7, 2009 at 4:24 PM #492330Anonymous
GuestThe problem with Tiger Woods is Tiger’s _________.
6 words or less give it a shot. The winner gets the exclusive rights to mentioning that paper hanging SOB’s name that will put an end to this madness!
December 7, 2009 at 4:35 PM #491480KSMountain
ParticipantWow. I’d have to say this thread has been hijacked.
The “life is only about my own mind and body and the stories I can tell about it” approach is kinda depressing to me.
If you do good for someone else, true, *you* can only experience your perception of your good work, but in fact, if you really helped that person, then their life is changed and you have indeed affected something external to yourself.
Over the course of a life you may be able to affect many many others positively…
I guess that would be one strategy for a life.
Another might be pure hedonism. Why not.
Equally valid approaches I guess. Although given we live in an interconnected society, I guess some approaches are more beneficial to the “tribe” than others…
December 7, 2009 at 4:35 PM #491646KSMountain
ParticipantWow. I’d have to say this thread has been hijacked.
The “life is only about my own mind and body and the stories I can tell about it” approach is kinda depressing to me.
If you do good for someone else, true, *you* can only experience your perception of your good work, but in fact, if you really helped that person, then their life is changed and you have indeed affected something external to yourself.
Over the course of a life you may be able to affect many many others positively…
I guess that would be one strategy for a life.
Another might be pure hedonism. Why not.
Equally valid approaches I guess. Although given we live in an interconnected society, I guess some approaches are more beneficial to the “tribe” than others…
December 7, 2009 at 4:35 PM #492028KSMountain
ParticipantWow. I’d have to say this thread has been hijacked.
The “life is only about my own mind and body and the stories I can tell about it” approach is kinda depressing to me.
If you do good for someone else, true, *you* can only experience your perception of your good work, but in fact, if you really helped that person, then their life is changed and you have indeed affected something external to yourself.
Over the course of a life you may be able to affect many many others positively…
I guess that would be one strategy for a life.
Another might be pure hedonism. Why not.
Equally valid approaches I guess. Although given we live in an interconnected society, I guess some approaches are more beneficial to the “tribe” than others…
December 7, 2009 at 4:35 PM #492116KSMountain
ParticipantWow. I’d have to say this thread has been hijacked.
The “life is only about my own mind and body and the stories I can tell about it” approach is kinda depressing to me.
If you do good for someone else, true, *you* can only experience your perception of your good work, but in fact, if you really helped that person, then their life is changed and you have indeed affected something external to yourself.
Over the course of a life you may be able to affect many many others positively…
I guess that would be one strategy for a life.
Another might be pure hedonism. Why not.
Equally valid approaches I guess. Although given we live in an interconnected society, I guess some approaches are more beneficial to the “tribe” than others…
December 7, 2009 at 4:35 PM #492350KSMountain
ParticipantWow. I’d have to say this thread has been hijacked.
The “life is only about my own mind and body and the stories I can tell about it” approach is kinda depressing to me.
If you do good for someone else, true, *you* can only experience your perception of your good work, but in fact, if you really helped that person, then their life is changed and you have indeed affected something external to yourself.
Over the course of a life you may be able to affect many many others positively…
I guess that would be one strategy for a life.
Another might be pure hedonism. Why not.
Equally valid approaches I guess. Although given we live in an interconnected society, I guess some approaches are more beneficial to the “tribe” than others…
December 7, 2009 at 4:57 PM #491490davelj
Participant[quote=KSMountain]Wow. I’d have to say this thread has been hijacked.
The “life is only about my own mind and body and the stories I can tell about it” approach is kinda depressing to me.
If you do good for someone else, true, *you* can only experience your perception of your good work, but in fact, if you really helped that person, then their life is changed and you have indeed affected something external to yourself.
Over the course of a life you may be able to affect many many others positively…
I guess that would be one strategy for a life.
Another might be pure hedonism. Why not.
Equally valid approaches I guess. Although given we live in an interconnected society, I guess some approaches are more beneficial to the “tribe” than others…[/quote]
Suggesting that hedonism and charity are mutually exclusive is absurd. I get immense pleasure from helping others. Otherwise I wouldn’t bother. (Of course, I also get pleasure from planning the demise of certain others when the opportunity arises – but I digress.) But, regardless of whether or not I’ve “affected something external to myself,” it’s only my perception of it that really matters. Because when I die, I won’t perceive anything.
December 7, 2009 at 4:57 PM #491656davelj
Participant[quote=KSMountain]Wow. I’d have to say this thread has been hijacked.
The “life is only about my own mind and body and the stories I can tell about it” approach is kinda depressing to me.
If you do good for someone else, true, *you* can only experience your perception of your good work, but in fact, if you really helped that person, then their life is changed and you have indeed affected something external to yourself.
Over the course of a life you may be able to affect many many others positively…
I guess that would be one strategy for a life.
Another might be pure hedonism. Why not.
Equally valid approaches I guess. Although given we live in an interconnected society, I guess some approaches are more beneficial to the “tribe” than others…[/quote]
Suggesting that hedonism and charity are mutually exclusive is absurd. I get immense pleasure from helping others. Otherwise I wouldn’t bother. (Of course, I also get pleasure from planning the demise of certain others when the opportunity arises – but I digress.) But, regardless of whether or not I’ve “affected something external to myself,” it’s only my perception of it that really matters. Because when I die, I won’t perceive anything.
December 7, 2009 at 4:57 PM #492038davelj
Participant[quote=KSMountain]Wow. I’d have to say this thread has been hijacked.
The “life is only about my own mind and body and the stories I can tell about it” approach is kinda depressing to me.
If you do good for someone else, true, *you* can only experience your perception of your good work, but in fact, if you really helped that person, then their life is changed and you have indeed affected something external to yourself.
Over the course of a life you may be able to affect many many others positively…
I guess that would be one strategy for a life.
Another might be pure hedonism. Why not.
Equally valid approaches I guess. Although given we live in an interconnected society, I guess some approaches are more beneficial to the “tribe” than others…[/quote]
Suggesting that hedonism and charity are mutually exclusive is absurd. I get immense pleasure from helping others. Otherwise I wouldn’t bother. (Of course, I also get pleasure from planning the demise of certain others when the opportunity arises – but I digress.) But, regardless of whether or not I’ve “affected something external to myself,” it’s only my perception of it that really matters. Because when I die, I won’t perceive anything.
December 7, 2009 at 4:57 PM #492126davelj
Participant[quote=KSMountain]Wow. I’d have to say this thread has been hijacked.
The “life is only about my own mind and body and the stories I can tell about it” approach is kinda depressing to me.
If you do good for someone else, true, *you* can only experience your perception of your good work, but in fact, if you really helped that person, then their life is changed and you have indeed affected something external to yourself.
Over the course of a life you may be able to affect many many others positively…
I guess that would be one strategy for a life.
Another might be pure hedonism. Why not.
Equally valid approaches I guess. Although given we live in an interconnected society, I guess some approaches are more beneficial to the “tribe” than others…[/quote]
Suggesting that hedonism and charity are mutually exclusive is absurd. I get immense pleasure from helping others. Otherwise I wouldn’t bother. (Of course, I also get pleasure from planning the demise of certain others when the opportunity arises – but I digress.) But, regardless of whether or not I’ve “affected something external to myself,” it’s only my perception of it that really matters. Because when I die, I won’t perceive anything.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.