- This topic has 645 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by fredo4.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 11, 2010 at 3:04 PM #563783June 11, 2010 at 4:15 PM #562851jpinpbParticipant
[quote=briansd1]
That’s because, before I started posting, and before I started responding in kind, the other side had no opposition.
[/quote]Speaking for myself, brian has a point. I prefer not to engage in political arguments, even though I don’t agree w/some posts and would oppose what’s said, I would not post anything. brian has taken on to be the voice of some who do not respond.
June 11, 2010 at 4:15 PM #562949jpinpbParticipant[quote=briansd1]
That’s because, before I started posting, and before I started responding in kind, the other side had no opposition.
[/quote]Speaking for myself, brian has a point. I prefer not to engage in political arguments, even though I don’t agree w/some posts and would oppose what’s said, I would not post anything. brian has taken on to be the voice of some who do not respond.
June 11, 2010 at 4:15 PM #563455jpinpbParticipant[quote=briansd1]
That’s because, before I started posting, and before I started responding in kind, the other side had no opposition.
[/quote]Speaking for myself, brian has a point. I prefer not to engage in political arguments, even though I don’t agree w/some posts and would oppose what’s said, I would not post anything. brian has taken on to be the voice of some who do not respond.
June 11, 2010 at 4:15 PM #563561jpinpbParticipant[quote=briansd1]
That’s because, before I started posting, and before I started responding in kind, the other side had no opposition.
[/quote]Speaking for myself, brian has a point. I prefer not to engage in political arguments, even though I don’t agree w/some posts and would oppose what’s said, I would not post anything. brian has taken on to be the voice of some who do not respond.
June 11, 2010 at 4:15 PM #563848jpinpbParticipant[quote=briansd1]
That’s because, before I started posting, and before I started responding in kind, the other side had no opposition.
[/quote]Speaking for myself, brian has a point. I prefer not to engage in political arguments, even though I don’t agree w/some posts and would oppose what’s said, I would not post anything. brian has taken on to be the voice of some who do not respond.
June 11, 2010 at 4:40 PM #562871AnonymousGuestDoes the ban extend to creepy Internet stalkers who continuously bring up your Internet handle in threads which you have nothing to do with? That’s pretty antagonistic, no?
June 11, 2010 at 4:40 PM #562969AnonymousGuestDoes the ban extend to creepy Internet stalkers who continuously bring up your Internet handle in threads which you have nothing to do with? That’s pretty antagonistic, no?
June 11, 2010 at 4:40 PM #563475AnonymousGuestDoes the ban extend to creepy Internet stalkers who continuously bring up your Internet handle in threads which you have nothing to do with? That’s pretty antagonistic, no?
June 11, 2010 at 4:40 PM #563582AnonymousGuestDoes the ban extend to creepy Internet stalkers who continuously bring up your Internet handle in threads which you have nothing to do with? That’s pretty antagonistic, no?
June 11, 2010 at 4:40 PM #563868AnonymousGuestDoes the ban extend to creepy Internet stalkers who continuously bring up your Internet handle in threads which you have nothing to do with? That’s pretty antagonistic, no?
June 11, 2010 at 5:10 PM #562886sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=ucodegen]I suspect that he may have just had enough of briansd1 and ‘lost it’. I just prefer not to ‘feed the trolls’.[/quote]
I pointed out that brian had threadjacked the thread and that someone responded with a “troll-feeding” remark. I recommended that either the the post be nuked, or that brian be nuked – per Rich’s earlier comments about bannable offenses.
Rich chose to nuke the comment that I asked to be nuked, as well as the response, as well as my request to nuke it.
So, how, exactly did I ‘lose it’ ?
June 11, 2010 at 5:10 PM #562984sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=ucodegen]I suspect that he may have just had enough of briansd1 and ‘lost it’. I just prefer not to ‘feed the trolls’.[/quote]
I pointed out that brian had threadjacked the thread and that someone responded with a “troll-feeding” remark. I recommended that either the the post be nuked, or that brian be nuked – per Rich’s earlier comments about bannable offenses.
Rich chose to nuke the comment that I asked to be nuked, as well as the response, as well as my request to nuke it.
So, how, exactly did I ‘lose it’ ?
June 11, 2010 at 5:10 PM #563490sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=ucodegen]I suspect that he may have just had enough of briansd1 and ‘lost it’. I just prefer not to ‘feed the trolls’.[/quote]
I pointed out that brian had threadjacked the thread and that someone responded with a “troll-feeding” remark. I recommended that either the the post be nuked, or that brian be nuked – per Rich’s earlier comments about bannable offenses.
Rich chose to nuke the comment that I asked to be nuked, as well as the response, as well as my request to nuke it.
So, how, exactly did I ‘lose it’ ?
June 11, 2010 at 5:10 PM #563597sdduuuudeParticipant[quote=ucodegen]I suspect that he may have just had enough of briansd1 and ‘lost it’. I just prefer not to ‘feed the trolls’.[/quote]
I pointed out that brian had threadjacked the thread and that someone responded with a “troll-feeding” remark. I recommended that either the the post be nuked, or that brian be nuked – per Rich’s earlier comments about bannable offenses.
Rich chose to nuke the comment that I asked to be nuked, as well as the response, as well as my request to nuke it.
So, how, exactly did I ‘lose it’ ?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.