- This topic has 850 replies, 51 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 8 months ago by sobmaz.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 23, 2010 at 11:31 AM #530617March 23, 2010 at 11:31 AM #529686AnonymousGuest
Bob, you said
“You can’t take more out of an INSURANCE program ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS than you put in. For all those that think they should only have to pay $200 a month for a prescription program, but know that their pre-existing condition means they must draw out $1000 per month, the need to understand this is no longer an insurance issue. Insurance premiums are based on a risk calculation, not sure thing.”From the point of view of an individual (or of an insurer looking at a particular individual), you are correct that insurance premiums are based ona risk calculation. But if one considers the societal purpose of insurance — to distribute the costs of accidents, disease or other misfortune — then we have every reason to cover pre-existing conditions. The trick in a private, voluntary insurance system is to get people to buy insurance and not just wait until they have a reason to.
Ucodegen mentioned he is “basically” self-insured. Although I don’t know the details, I would guess he does not mean that literally. What we need to remember is that we have a social compact to cover anyone whose losses are so catastrophic or needs become so great that he or she cannot pay. We hope Ucodegen does not face the heartache of becoming that destitute but the possibility is there. Personally, I think a program that tries to get thirty million more people into a covered plan is smart and will avoid a lot of heartache and cost in the long run.
March 23, 2010 at 11:31 AM #529815AnonymousGuestBob, you said
“You can’t take more out of an INSURANCE program ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS than you put in. For all those that think they should only have to pay $200 a month for a prescription program, but know that their pre-existing condition means they must draw out $1000 per month, the need to understand this is no longer an insurance issue. Insurance premiums are based on a risk calculation, not sure thing.”From the point of view of an individual (or of an insurer looking at a particular individual), you are correct that insurance premiums are based ona risk calculation. But if one considers the societal purpose of insurance — to distribute the costs of accidents, disease or other misfortune — then we have every reason to cover pre-existing conditions. The trick in a private, voluntary insurance system is to get people to buy insurance and not just wait until they have a reason to.
Ucodegen mentioned he is “basically” self-insured. Although I don’t know the details, I would guess he does not mean that literally. What we need to remember is that we have a social compact to cover anyone whose losses are so catastrophic or needs become so great that he or she cannot pay. We hope Ucodegen does not face the heartache of becoming that destitute but the possibility is there. Personally, I think a program that tries to get thirty million more people into a covered plan is smart and will avoid a lot of heartache and cost in the long run.
March 23, 2010 at 11:31 AM #530265AnonymousGuestBob, you said
“You can’t take more out of an INSURANCE program ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS than you put in. For all those that think they should only have to pay $200 a month for a prescription program, but know that their pre-existing condition means they must draw out $1000 per month, the need to understand this is no longer an insurance issue. Insurance premiums are based on a risk calculation, not sure thing.”From the point of view of an individual (or of an insurer looking at a particular individual), you are correct that insurance premiums are based ona risk calculation. But if one considers the societal purpose of insurance — to distribute the costs of accidents, disease or other misfortune — then we have every reason to cover pre-existing conditions. The trick in a private, voluntary insurance system is to get people to buy insurance and not just wait until they have a reason to.
Ucodegen mentioned he is “basically” self-insured. Although I don’t know the details, I would guess he does not mean that literally. What we need to remember is that we have a social compact to cover anyone whose losses are so catastrophic or needs become so great that he or she cannot pay. We hope Ucodegen does not face the heartache of becoming that destitute but the possibility is there. Personally, I think a program that tries to get thirty million more people into a covered plan is smart and will avoid a lot of heartache and cost in the long run.
March 23, 2010 at 11:31 AM #530363AnonymousGuestBob, you said
“You can’t take more out of an INSURANCE program ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS than you put in. For all those that think they should only have to pay $200 a month for a prescription program, but know that their pre-existing condition means they must draw out $1000 per month, the need to understand this is no longer an insurance issue. Insurance premiums are based on a risk calculation, not sure thing.”From the point of view of an individual (or of an insurer looking at a particular individual), you are correct that insurance premiums are based ona risk calculation. But if one considers the societal purpose of insurance — to distribute the costs of accidents, disease or other misfortune — then we have every reason to cover pre-existing conditions. The trick in a private, voluntary insurance system is to get people to buy insurance and not just wait until they have a reason to.
Ucodegen mentioned he is “basically” self-insured. Although I don’t know the details, I would guess he does not mean that literally. What we need to remember is that we have a social compact to cover anyone whose losses are so catastrophic or needs become so great that he or she cannot pay. We hope Ucodegen does not face the heartache of becoming that destitute but the possibility is there. Personally, I think a program that tries to get thirty million more people into a covered plan is smart and will avoid a lot of heartache and cost in the long run.
March 23, 2010 at 11:31 AM #530622AnonymousGuestBob, you said
“You can’t take more out of an INSURANCE program ON A CONTINUOUS BASIS than you put in. For all those that think they should only have to pay $200 a month for a prescription program, but know that their pre-existing condition means they must draw out $1000 per month, the need to understand this is no longer an insurance issue. Insurance premiums are based on a risk calculation, not sure thing.”From the point of view of an individual (or of an insurer looking at a particular individual), you are correct that insurance premiums are based ona risk calculation. But if one considers the societal purpose of insurance — to distribute the costs of accidents, disease or other misfortune — then we have every reason to cover pre-existing conditions. The trick in a private, voluntary insurance system is to get people to buy insurance and not just wait until they have a reason to.
Ucodegen mentioned he is “basically” self-insured. Although I don’t know the details, I would guess he does not mean that literally. What we need to remember is that we have a social compact to cover anyone whose losses are so catastrophic or needs become so great that he or she cannot pay. We hope Ucodegen does not face the heartache of becoming that destitute but the possibility is there. Personally, I think a program that tries to get thirty million more people into a covered plan is smart and will avoid a lot of heartache and cost in the long run.
March 23, 2010 at 11:34 AM #529691AecetiaParticipantChristmas came early this year:
“It’s just going to be like Christmas,” said DeCarlo Flythe, who lost health coverage for his family when he was laid off almost three years ago. “It’s going to be great. You know, no worries (about) the bills. We are going to go ahead and pay our co-pay and be alright.”
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/7281166/
Good luck with that….
March 23, 2010 at 11:34 AM #529820AecetiaParticipantChristmas came early this year:
“It’s just going to be like Christmas,” said DeCarlo Flythe, who lost health coverage for his family when he was laid off almost three years ago. “It’s going to be great. You know, no worries (about) the bills. We are going to go ahead and pay our co-pay and be alright.”
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/7281166/
Good luck with that….
March 23, 2010 at 11:34 AM #530270AecetiaParticipantChristmas came early this year:
“It’s just going to be like Christmas,” said DeCarlo Flythe, who lost health coverage for his family when he was laid off almost three years ago. “It’s going to be great. You know, no worries (about) the bills. We are going to go ahead and pay our co-pay and be alright.”
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/7281166/
Good luck with that….
March 23, 2010 at 11:34 AM #530368AecetiaParticipantChristmas came early this year:
“It’s just going to be like Christmas,” said DeCarlo Flythe, who lost health coverage for his family when he was laid off almost three years ago. “It’s going to be great. You know, no worries (about) the bills. We are going to go ahead and pay our co-pay and be alright.”
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/7281166/
Good luck with that….
March 23, 2010 at 11:34 AM #530627AecetiaParticipantChristmas came early this year:
“It’s just going to be like Christmas,” said DeCarlo Flythe, who lost health coverage for his family when he was laid off almost three years ago. “It’s going to be great. You know, no worries (about) the bills. We are going to go ahead and pay our co-pay and be alright.”
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/7281166/
Good luck with that….
March 23, 2010 at 11:35 AM #529696dbapigParticipantBob obviously doesn’t understand how insurance works.
March 23, 2010 at 11:35 AM #529825dbapigParticipantBob obviously doesn’t understand how insurance works.
March 23, 2010 at 11:35 AM #530274dbapigParticipantBob obviously doesn’t understand how insurance works.
March 23, 2010 at 11:35 AM #530373dbapigParticipantBob obviously doesn’t understand how insurance works.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.