Menu

Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › This sums up SEH and REOs

Viewing 11 posts - 16 through 26 (of 26 total)
1 2
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 16, 2009 at 5:51 PM #330153
    meadandale
    Participant

    Well, one house looks great and appears to have been landscaped as well. The other has a dirt yard so you can only imagine what the rest of the house looks like. Maybe not $200k worth of a difference but clearly worth more. OTOH, there are homes in carmel valley for under a million now that put both of these to shame.

    January 16, 2009 at 6:02 PM #330580
    Eugene
    Participant

    [quote=meadandale]OTOH, there are homes in carmel valley for under a million now that put both of these to shame.[/quote]

    3700 sf with panoramic view in carmel valley under a million? Not in this universe. The cheapest home that “puts both of these to shame” is IMHO 11629 Thistle Hill, asking price 1.17m.

    January 16, 2009 at 6:02 PM #330505
    Eugene
    Participant

    [quote=meadandale]OTOH, there are homes in carmel valley for under a million now that put both of these to shame.[/quote]

    3700 sf with panoramic view in carmel valley under a million? Not in this universe. The cheapest home that “puts both of these to shame” is IMHO 11629 Thistle Hill, asking price 1.17m.

    January 16, 2009 at 6:02 PM #330607
    Eugene
    Participant

    [quote=meadandale]OTOH, there are homes in carmel valley for under a million now that put both of these to shame.[/quote]

    3700 sf with panoramic view in carmel valley under a million? Not in this universe. The cheapest home that “puts both of these to shame” is IMHO 11629 Thistle Hill, asking price 1.17m.

    January 16, 2009 at 6:02 PM #330168
    Eugene
    Participant

    [quote=meadandale]OTOH, there are homes in carmel valley for under a million now that put both of these to shame.[/quote]

    3700 sf with panoramic view in carmel valley under a million? Not in this universe. The cheapest home that “puts both of these to shame” is IMHO 11629 Thistle Hill, asking price 1.17m.

    January 16, 2009 at 6:02 PM #330691
    Eugene
    Participant

    [quote=meadandale]OTOH, there are homes in carmel valley for under a million now that put both of these to shame.[/quote]

    3700 sf with panoramic view in carmel valley under a million? Not in this universe. The cheapest home that “puts both of these to shame” is IMHO 11629 Thistle Hill, asking price 1.17m.

    January 16, 2009 at 8:34 PM #330561
    meadandale
    Participant

    [quote=esmith][quote=meadandale]OTOH, there are homes in carmel valley for under a million now that put both of these to shame.[/quote]

    3700 sf with panoramic view in carmel valley under a million? Not in this universe. The cheapest home that “puts both of these to shame” is IMHO 11629 Thistle Hill, asking price 1.17m.
    [/quote]

    Lago Di Grata…several homes at or under a million in the 3500 sq ft range and all the ones on the south side of the street have panoramic views.

    January 16, 2009 at 8:34 PM #330635
    meadandale
    Participant

    [quote=esmith][quote=meadandale]OTOH, there are homes in carmel valley for under a million now that put both of these to shame.[/quote]

    3700 sf with panoramic view in carmel valley under a million? Not in this universe. The cheapest home that “puts both of these to shame” is IMHO 11629 Thistle Hill, asking price 1.17m.
    [/quote]

    Lago Di Grata…several homes at or under a million in the 3500 sq ft range and all the ones on the south side of the street have panoramic views.

    January 16, 2009 at 8:34 PM #330223
    meadandale
    Participant

    [quote=esmith][quote=meadandale]OTOH, there are homes in carmel valley for under a million now that put both of these to shame.[/quote]

    3700 sf with panoramic view in carmel valley under a million? Not in this universe. The cheapest home that “puts both of these to shame” is IMHO 11629 Thistle Hill, asking price 1.17m.
    [/quote]

    Lago Di Grata…several homes at or under a million in the 3500 sq ft range and all the ones on the south side of the street have panoramic views.

    January 16, 2009 at 8:34 PM #330662
    meadandale
    Participant

    [quote=esmith][quote=meadandale]OTOH, there are homes in carmel valley for under a million now that put both of these to shame.[/quote]

    3700 sf with panoramic view in carmel valley under a million? Not in this universe. The cheapest home that “puts both of these to shame” is IMHO 11629 Thistle Hill, asking price 1.17m.
    [/quote]

    Lago Di Grata…several homes at or under a million in the 3500 sq ft range and all the ones on the south side of the street have panoramic views.

    January 16, 2009 at 8:34 PM #330746
    meadandale
    Participant

    [quote=esmith][quote=meadandale]OTOH, there are homes in carmel valley for under a million now that put both of these to shame.[/quote]

    3700 sf with panoramic view in carmel valley under a million? Not in this universe. The cheapest home that “puts both of these to shame” is IMHO 11629 Thistle Hill, asking price 1.17m.
    [/quote]

    Lago Di Grata…several homes at or under a million in the 3500 sq ft range and all the ones on the south side of the street have panoramic views.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 11 posts - 16 through 26 (of 26 total)
1 2
  • The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.