- This topic has 140 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by
Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 24, 2009 at 8:08 AM #15549April 24, 2009 at 8:16 AM #386663
Coronita
ParticipantLol…And it’s probably just a start too….
How many more years do you folks think people going to rent to wait for a bottom? Just curious.
April 24, 2009 at 8:16 AM #386926Coronita
ParticipantLol…And it’s probably just a start too….
How many more years do you folks think people going to rent to wait for a bottom? Just curious.
April 24, 2009 at 8:16 AM #387121Coronita
ParticipantLol…And it’s probably just a start too….
How many more years do you folks think people going to rent to wait for a bottom? Just curious.
April 24, 2009 at 8:16 AM #387172Coronita
ParticipantLol…And it’s probably just a start too….
How many more years do you folks think people going to rent to wait for a bottom? Just curious.
April 24, 2009 at 8:16 AM #387311Coronita
ParticipantLol…And it’s probably just a start too….
How many more years do you folks think people going to rent to wait for a bottom? Just curious.
April 24, 2009 at 8:30 AM #386658jpinpb
ParticipantThis sucks like gravity.
Edit:
OMG – (e) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2011, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2011, deletes or extends that date.
It will never end π
Edit – again.
It’s over, folks.
(D) Reduction of principal.
April 24, 2009 at 8:30 AM #386921jpinpb
ParticipantThis sucks like gravity.
Edit:
OMG – (e) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2011, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2011, deletes or extends that date.
It will never end π
Edit – again.
It’s over, folks.
(D) Reduction of principal.
April 24, 2009 at 8:30 AM #387117jpinpb
ParticipantThis sucks like gravity.
Edit:
OMG – (e) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2011, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2011, deletes or extends that date.
It will never end π
Edit – again.
It’s over, folks.
(D) Reduction of principal.
April 24, 2009 at 8:30 AM #387167jpinpb
ParticipantThis sucks like gravity.
Edit:
OMG – (e) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2011, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2011, deletes or extends that date.
It will never end π
Edit – again.
It’s over, folks.
(D) Reduction of principal.
April 24, 2009 at 8:30 AM #387306jpinpb
ParticipantThis sucks like gravity.
Edit:
OMG – (e) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2011, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2011, deletes or extends that date.
It will never end π
Edit – again.
It’s over, folks.
(D) Reduction of principal.
April 24, 2009 at 8:33 AM #386668jpinpb
ParticipantOh – A criteria:
(i) Nothing in this section or Section 2923.52 shall require a servicer to violate contractual agreements for investor-owned loans
or provide a modification to a borrower who is not willing or able to pay under the modification.As if someone won’t lie and say they are not investors – and who the heck won’t be able to pay if their principle and interest is reduced.
April 24, 2009 at 8:33 AM #386931jpinpb
ParticipantOh – A criteria:
(i) Nothing in this section or Section 2923.52 shall require a servicer to violate contractual agreements for investor-owned loans
or provide a modification to a borrower who is not willing or able to pay under the modification.As if someone won’t lie and say they are not investors – and who the heck won’t be able to pay if their principle and interest is reduced.
April 24, 2009 at 8:33 AM #387125jpinpb
ParticipantOh – A criteria:
(i) Nothing in this section or Section 2923.52 shall require a servicer to violate contractual agreements for investor-owned loans
or provide a modification to a borrower who is not willing or able to pay under the modification.As if someone won’t lie and say they are not investors – and who the heck won’t be able to pay if their principle and interest is reduced.
April 24, 2009 at 8:33 AM #387177jpinpb
ParticipantOh – A criteria:
(i) Nothing in this section or Section 2923.52 shall require a servicer to violate contractual agreements for investor-owned loans
or provide a modification to a borrower who is not willing or able to pay under the modification.As if someone won’t lie and say they are not investors – and who the heck won’t be able to pay if their principle and interest is reduced.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.