- This topic has 1,110 replies, 35 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by
NotCranky.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 17, 2010 at 10:11 AM #527682March 17, 2010 at 10:26 AM #526751
briansd1
Guest[quote=mydogsarelazy]I read the article this morning and found it well done. One thing that is pointed out is that some observers are surprised that more underwater homeowners haven’t yet walked away.
In the coming years mortgage fatigue will wear down many more people. What this article describes is a trend that is really the beginning of a slow melt.
JS[/quote]
I agree. I said the same thing before when it was sacrilegious to even mention it.
Bankers thought that people would sacrifice everything just to keep the house. It turn out that it’s the opposite. People will pay for their cars, dinners out, movies, cable TV, clothing, etc.. before they pay the house.
It’s a new cultural phenomenon; and I’m sure that sociologists and economists will be studying the implications of mortgage walkaways for years.
March 17, 2010 at 10:26 AM #526883briansd1
Guest[quote=mydogsarelazy]I read the article this morning and found it well done. One thing that is pointed out is that some observers are surprised that more underwater homeowners haven’t yet walked away.
In the coming years mortgage fatigue will wear down many more people. What this article describes is a trend that is really the beginning of a slow melt.
JS[/quote]
I agree. I said the same thing before when it was sacrilegious to even mention it.
Bankers thought that people would sacrifice everything just to keep the house. It turn out that it’s the opposite. People will pay for their cars, dinners out, movies, cable TV, clothing, etc.. before they pay the house.
It’s a new cultural phenomenon; and I’m sure that sociologists and economists will be studying the implications of mortgage walkaways for years.
March 17, 2010 at 10:26 AM #527332briansd1
Guest[quote=mydogsarelazy]I read the article this morning and found it well done. One thing that is pointed out is that some observers are surprised that more underwater homeowners haven’t yet walked away.
In the coming years mortgage fatigue will wear down many more people. What this article describes is a trend that is really the beginning of a slow melt.
JS[/quote]
I agree. I said the same thing before when it was sacrilegious to even mention it.
Bankers thought that people would sacrifice everything just to keep the house. It turn out that it’s the opposite. People will pay for their cars, dinners out, movies, cable TV, clothing, etc.. before they pay the house.
It’s a new cultural phenomenon; and I’m sure that sociologists and economists will be studying the implications of mortgage walkaways for years.
March 17, 2010 at 10:26 AM #527428briansd1
Guest[quote=mydogsarelazy]I read the article this morning and found it well done. One thing that is pointed out is that some observers are surprised that more underwater homeowners haven’t yet walked away.
In the coming years mortgage fatigue will wear down many more people. What this article describes is a trend that is really the beginning of a slow melt.
JS[/quote]
I agree. I said the same thing before when it was sacrilegious to even mention it.
Bankers thought that people would sacrifice everything just to keep the house. It turn out that it’s the opposite. People will pay for their cars, dinners out, movies, cable TV, clothing, etc.. before they pay the house.
It’s a new cultural phenomenon; and I’m sure that sociologists and economists will be studying the implications of mortgage walkaways for years.
March 17, 2010 at 10:26 AM #527687briansd1
Guest[quote=mydogsarelazy]I read the article this morning and found it well done. One thing that is pointed out is that some observers are surprised that more underwater homeowners haven’t yet walked away.
In the coming years mortgage fatigue will wear down many more people. What this article describes is a trend that is really the beginning of a slow melt.
JS[/quote]
I agree. I said the same thing before when it was sacrilegious to even mention it.
Bankers thought that people would sacrifice everything just to keep the house. It turn out that it’s the opposite. People will pay for their cars, dinners out, movies, cable TV, clothing, etc.. before they pay the house.
It’s a new cultural phenomenon; and I’m sure that sociologists and economists will be studying the implications of mortgage walkaways for years.
March 17, 2010 at 10:35 AM #5267664plexowner
Participant“duped into an expensive loan”
I second everything davelj said – walk away, don’t walk away, that’s your decision
but don’t insult my intelligence by trying to pretend that someone else is responsible for your stupid financial decisions
March 17, 2010 at 10:35 AM #5268984plexowner
Participant“duped into an expensive loan”
I second everything davelj said – walk away, don’t walk away, that’s your decision
but don’t insult my intelligence by trying to pretend that someone else is responsible for your stupid financial decisions
March 17, 2010 at 10:35 AM #5273474plexowner
Participant“duped into an expensive loan”
I second everything davelj said – walk away, don’t walk away, that’s your decision
but don’t insult my intelligence by trying to pretend that someone else is responsible for your stupid financial decisions
March 17, 2010 at 10:35 AM #5274434plexowner
Participant“duped into an expensive loan”
I second everything davelj said – walk away, don’t walk away, that’s your decision
but don’t insult my intelligence by trying to pretend that someone else is responsible for your stupid financial decisions
March 17, 2010 at 10:35 AM #5277024plexowner
Participant“duped into an expensive loan”
I second everything davelj said – walk away, don’t walk away, that’s your decision
but don’t insult my intelligence by trying to pretend that someone else is responsible for your stupid financial decisions
March 17, 2010 at 11:11 AM #526796UCGal
ParticipantDave pretty much nailed it for me.
Lots of blame to go around. The strategic defaulters aren’t victims. The folks who took out loans more than they could afford are responsible for their bad decisions. As is the bank that loaned them more than they could afford.
Banks should pay a price for bad underwriting. Folks who walk away (strategically or not) should pay the price of lost down payments, credit score hits, social stigma… Share the blame, share the pain.
March 17, 2010 at 11:11 AM #526928UCGal
ParticipantDave pretty much nailed it for me.
Lots of blame to go around. The strategic defaulters aren’t victims. The folks who took out loans more than they could afford are responsible for their bad decisions. As is the bank that loaned them more than they could afford.
Banks should pay a price for bad underwriting. Folks who walk away (strategically or not) should pay the price of lost down payments, credit score hits, social stigma… Share the blame, share the pain.
March 17, 2010 at 11:11 AM #527377UCGal
ParticipantDave pretty much nailed it for me.
Lots of blame to go around. The strategic defaulters aren’t victims. The folks who took out loans more than they could afford are responsible for their bad decisions. As is the bank that loaned them more than they could afford.
Banks should pay a price for bad underwriting. Folks who walk away (strategically or not) should pay the price of lost down payments, credit score hits, social stigma… Share the blame, share the pain.
March 17, 2010 at 11:11 AM #527473UCGal
ParticipantDave pretty much nailed it for me.
Lots of blame to go around. The strategic defaulters aren’t victims. The folks who took out loans more than they could afford are responsible for their bad decisions. As is the bank that loaned them more than they could afford.
Banks should pay a price for bad underwriting. Folks who walk away (strategically or not) should pay the price of lost down payments, credit score hits, social stigma… Share the blame, share the pain.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
