Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › The Forgotten Man
- This topic has 287 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by kewp.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 5, 2008 at 8:14 PM #14088October 5, 2008 at 8:22 PM #2816724plexownerParticipant
History clearly shows that government intervention in financial markets makes matters worse – both in the ultimate cost of recovery and in the time it takes for recovery to occur (ie, recovery costs more and takes longer when the government gets involved)
Since Americans choose to ignore history maybe it will be different this time???
Yeah, and monkeys might fly out of my butt at any moment …
October 5, 2008 at 8:22 PM #2819504plexownerParticipantHistory clearly shows that government intervention in financial markets makes matters worse – both in the ultimate cost of recovery and in the time it takes for recovery to occur (ie, recovery costs more and takes longer when the government gets involved)
Since Americans choose to ignore history maybe it will be different this time???
Yeah, and monkeys might fly out of my butt at any moment …
October 5, 2008 at 8:22 PM #2819534plexownerParticipantHistory clearly shows that government intervention in financial markets makes matters worse – both in the ultimate cost of recovery and in the time it takes for recovery to occur (ie, recovery costs more and takes longer when the government gets involved)
Since Americans choose to ignore history maybe it will be different this time???
Yeah, and monkeys might fly out of my butt at any moment …
October 5, 2008 at 8:22 PM #2819944plexownerParticipantHistory clearly shows that government intervention in financial markets makes matters worse – both in the ultimate cost of recovery and in the time it takes for recovery to occur (ie, recovery costs more and takes longer when the government gets involved)
Since Americans choose to ignore history maybe it will be different this time???
Yeah, and monkeys might fly out of my butt at any moment …
October 5, 2008 at 8:22 PM #2820074plexownerParticipantHistory clearly shows that government intervention in financial markets makes matters worse – both in the ultimate cost of recovery and in the time it takes for recovery to occur (ie, recovery costs more and takes longer when the government gets involved)
Since Americans choose to ignore history maybe it will be different this time???
Yeah, and monkeys might fly out of my butt at any moment …
October 5, 2008 at 9:24 PM #281712EugeneParticipantThis is simply a case of supply and demand.
Rich people hate paying taxes. They especially hate it when their taxes are spent helping poor people. They feel that they are being robbed by the government. They dream of an ideal world with no taxes, no government, no minimum wage, no unemployment benefits, no socialized healthcare, where rich people would live in their mansions and poor people would serve them for scraps off their tables. They even have their own party. It pursues interests of the richest 10% of the population and fools another 40% into voting for them by using various deceptive practices.
Naturally, there’s a lot of demand for books, articles, theories, etc. that would justify why big government is bad and why taxes are bad.
When there’s demand, there’s supply. This book is an example of this supply.
October 5, 2008 at 9:24 PM #281990EugeneParticipantThis is simply a case of supply and demand.
Rich people hate paying taxes. They especially hate it when their taxes are spent helping poor people. They feel that they are being robbed by the government. They dream of an ideal world with no taxes, no government, no minimum wage, no unemployment benefits, no socialized healthcare, where rich people would live in their mansions and poor people would serve them for scraps off their tables. They even have their own party. It pursues interests of the richest 10% of the population and fools another 40% into voting for them by using various deceptive practices.
Naturally, there’s a lot of demand for books, articles, theories, etc. that would justify why big government is bad and why taxes are bad.
When there’s demand, there’s supply. This book is an example of this supply.
October 5, 2008 at 9:24 PM #281993EugeneParticipantThis is simply a case of supply and demand.
Rich people hate paying taxes. They especially hate it when their taxes are spent helping poor people. They feel that they are being robbed by the government. They dream of an ideal world with no taxes, no government, no minimum wage, no unemployment benefits, no socialized healthcare, where rich people would live in their mansions and poor people would serve them for scraps off their tables. They even have their own party. It pursues interests of the richest 10% of the population and fools another 40% into voting for them by using various deceptive practices.
Naturally, there’s a lot of demand for books, articles, theories, etc. that would justify why big government is bad and why taxes are bad.
When there’s demand, there’s supply. This book is an example of this supply.
October 5, 2008 at 9:24 PM #282034EugeneParticipantThis is simply a case of supply and demand.
Rich people hate paying taxes. They especially hate it when their taxes are spent helping poor people. They feel that they are being robbed by the government. They dream of an ideal world with no taxes, no government, no minimum wage, no unemployment benefits, no socialized healthcare, where rich people would live in their mansions and poor people would serve them for scraps off their tables. They even have their own party. It pursues interests of the richest 10% of the population and fools another 40% into voting for them by using various deceptive practices.
Naturally, there’s a lot of demand for books, articles, theories, etc. that would justify why big government is bad and why taxes are bad.
When there’s demand, there’s supply. This book is an example of this supply.
October 5, 2008 at 9:24 PM #282047EugeneParticipantThis is simply a case of supply and demand.
Rich people hate paying taxes. They especially hate it when their taxes are spent helping poor people. They feel that they are being robbed by the government. They dream of an ideal world with no taxes, no government, no minimum wage, no unemployment benefits, no socialized healthcare, where rich people would live in their mansions and poor people would serve them for scraps off their tables. They even have their own party. It pursues interests of the richest 10% of the population and fools another 40% into voting for them by using various deceptive practices.
Naturally, there’s a lot of demand for books, articles, theories, etc. that would justify why big government is bad and why taxes are bad.
When there’s demand, there’s supply. This book is an example of this supply.
October 5, 2008 at 9:45 PM #2817174plexownerParticipantAnd if I had to guess whether esmith fell into the ‘rich’ camp or the ‘poor’ camp I would guess …
~
I’ve been working hard since I was 12 – is it wrong for me to feel like I have a right to keep the money / things I have worked for?
Because my parents emphasized education and made sure that I got one I am supposed to pay 50 to 70% of my earnings to support a bunch of low-life chimpanzees who want to lay around watching TV, doing drugs and producing illegitimate children?
October 5, 2008 at 9:45 PM #2819954plexownerParticipantAnd if I had to guess whether esmith fell into the ‘rich’ camp or the ‘poor’ camp I would guess …
~
I’ve been working hard since I was 12 – is it wrong for me to feel like I have a right to keep the money / things I have worked for?
Because my parents emphasized education and made sure that I got one I am supposed to pay 50 to 70% of my earnings to support a bunch of low-life chimpanzees who want to lay around watching TV, doing drugs and producing illegitimate children?
October 5, 2008 at 9:45 PM #2819984plexownerParticipantAnd if I had to guess whether esmith fell into the ‘rich’ camp or the ‘poor’ camp I would guess …
~
I’ve been working hard since I was 12 – is it wrong for me to feel like I have a right to keep the money / things I have worked for?
Because my parents emphasized education and made sure that I got one I am supposed to pay 50 to 70% of my earnings to support a bunch of low-life chimpanzees who want to lay around watching TV, doing drugs and producing illegitimate children?
October 5, 2008 at 9:45 PM #2820394plexownerParticipantAnd if I had to guess whether esmith fell into the ‘rich’ camp or the ‘poor’ camp I would guess …
~
I’ve been working hard since I was 12 – is it wrong for me to feel like I have a right to keep the money / things I have worked for?
Because my parents emphasized education and made sure that I got one I am supposed to pay 50 to 70% of my earnings to support a bunch of low-life chimpanzees who want to lay around watching TV, doing drugs and producing illegitimate children?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.