The “bottom” for various neighborhoods in SD

[JC]

Anyone willing to take a stab at projcestions for these areas:

* North Park
* South Park
* University Heights
* Hillcrest / Mission Hills

Thanks much.

[sd_bear]

I can’t give dates of when, but I’m pretty sure that they will actually bottom in that order.

North Park, then South Park, the Univ Heights, then Hillcrest, then Mission Hills.

When I walk my dog every night in University Heights past the for sale signs I still see a LOT of denial.

I think Hillcrest/Mission Hills will be 2010+, and the other 3 may occur by the end of 2009. The more desirable areas hold up longer.

[sd_bear]

I can’t give dates of when, but I’m pretty sure that they will actually bottom in that order.

North Park, then South Park, the Univ Heights, then Hillcrest, then Mission Hills.

When I walk my dog every night in University Heights past the for sale signs I still see a LOT of denial.

I think Hillcrest/Mission Hills will be 2010+, and the other 3 may occur by the end of 2009. The more desirable areas hold up longer.

[sd_bear]

I can’t give dates of when, but I’m pretty sure that they will actually bottom in that order.

North Park, then South Park, the Univ Heights, then Hillcrest, then Mission Hills.

When I walk my dog every night in University Heights past the for sale signs I still see a LOT of denial.

I think Hillcrest/Mission Hills will be 2010+, and the other 3 may occur by the end of 2009. The more desirable areas hold up longer.

[sd_bear]

I can’t give dates of when, but I’m pretty sure that they will actually bottom in that order.

North Park, then South Park, the Univ Heights, then Hillcrest, then Mission Hills.

When I walk my dog every night in University Heights past the for sale signs I still see a LOT of denial.

I think Hillcrest/Mission Hills will be 2010+, and the other 3 may occur by the end of 2009. The more desirable areas hold up longer.

[sd_bear]

I can’t give dates of when, but I’m pretty sure that they will actually bottom in that order.

North Park, then South Park, the Univ Heights, then Hillcrest, then Mission Hills.

When I walk my dog every night in University Heights past the for sale signs I still see a LOT of denial.

I think Hillcrest/Mission Hills will be 2010+, and the other 3 may occur by the end of 2009. The more desirable areas hold up longer.

[JC]

Gotcha. Thanks for the input.

I concur on the denial in UH. I also walk my dog in that area every day and cruise past tons of for sale signs. When I look up the prices, they are so out of whack it is laughable.

Thanks again.

[JC]

Gotcha. Thanks for the input.

I concur on the denial in UH. I also walk my dog in that area every day and cruise past tons of for sale signs. When I look up the prices, they are so out of whack it is laughable.

Thanks again.

[JC]

Gotcha. Thanks for the input.

I concur on the denial in UH. I also walk my dog in that area every day and cruise past tons of for sale signs. When I look up the prices, they are so out of whack it is laughable.

Thanks again.

[JC]

Gotcha. Thanks for the input.

I concur on the denial in UH. I also walk my dog in that area every day and cruise past tons of for sale signs. When I look up the prices, they are so out of whack it is laughable.

Thanks again.

[JC]

Gotcha. Thanks for the input.

I concur on the denial in UH. I also walk my dog in that area every day and cruise past tons of for sale signs. When I look up the prices, they are so out of whack it is laughable.

Thanks again.

[La Jolla Renter]

sdrealtor… you hit it… bottom is when rent = buy.

Maybe in Temecula/Chula Vista etc., it even over shoots rent = buy a bit.

I can’t put a time on it. The news is as bad as I could have expect and lots of buying still going on.

As for La Jolla, I really don’t see that single family homes have even gone back to the 2005 peak.

[La Jolla Renter]

sdrealtor… you hit it… bottom is when rent = buy.

Maybe in Temecula/Chula Vista etc., it even over shoots rent = buy a bit.

I can’t put a time on it. The news is as bad as I could have expect and lots of buying still going on.

As for La Jolla, I really don’t see that single family homes have even gone back to the 2005 peak.

[La Jolla Renter]

sdrealtor… you hit it… bottom is when rent = buy.

Maybe in Temecula/Chula Vista etc., it even over shoots rent = buy a bit.

I can’t put a time on it. The news is as bad as I could have expect and lots of buying still going on.

As for La Jolla, I really don’t see that single family homes have even gone back to the 2005 peak.

[La Jolla Renter]

sdrealtor… you hit it… bottom is when rent = buy.

Maybe in Temecula/Chula Vista etc., it even over shoots rent = buy a bit.

I can’t put a time on it. The news is as bad as I could have expect and lots of buying still going on.

As for La Jolla, I really don’t see that single family homes have even gone back to the 2005 peak.

[Author]

Posts