- This topic has 125 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by
(former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 13, 2010 at 10:08 AM #578389July 13, 2010 at 10:21 AM #577366
5yearwaiter
Participant[quote=jpinpb]We have learned nothing. Gambling is a way of life now.[/quote]
But… but here loser turns a winner in this Gambling. Have you seen such anywhere?
July 13, 2010 at 10:21 AM #5774605yearwaiter
Participant[quote=jpinpb]We have learned nothing. Gambling is a way of life now.[/quote]
But… but here loser turns a winner in this Gambling. Have you seen such anywhere?
July 13, 2010 at 10:21 AM #5779875yearwaiter
Participant[quote=jpinpb]We have learned nothing. Gambling is a way of life now.[/quote]
But… but here loser turns a winner in this Gambling. Have you seen such anywhere?
July 13, 2010 at 10:21 AM #5780935yearwaiter
Participant[quote=jpinpb]We have learned nothing. Gambling is a way of life now.[/quote]
But… but here loser turns a winner in this Gambling. Have you seen such anywhere?
July 13, 2010 at 10:21 AM #5783945yearwaiter
Participant[quote=jpinpb]We have learned nothing. Gambling is a way of life now.[/quote]
But… but here loser turns a winner in this Gambling. Have you seen such anywhere?
July 13, 2010 at 8:02 PM #577686jpinpb
ParticipantAll the taxpayers are losing, including the homeowners overpaying on their homes. They are subsidizing their own homes (and others) while paying extra for it.
July 13, 2010 at 8:02 PM #577780jpinpb
ParticipantAll the taxpayers are losing, including the homeowners overpaying on their homes. They are subsidizing their own homes (and others) while paying extra for it.
July 13, 2010 at 8:02 PM #578307jpinpb
ParticipantAll the taxpayers are losing, including the homeowners overpaying on their homes. They are subsidizing their own homes (and others) while paying extra for it.
July 13, 2010 at 8:02 PM #578413jpinpb
ParticipantAll the taxpayers are losing, including the homeowners overpaying on their homes. They are subsidizing their own homes (and others) while paying extra for it.
July 13, 2010 at 8:02 PM #578715jpinpb
ParticipantAll the taxpayers are losing, including the homeowners overpaying on their homes. They are subsidizing their own homes (and others) while paying extra for it.
July 13, 2010 at 10:33 PM #577736patb
Participant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]That’s why I suggest they might not fund these unless the LTV of 75% or better, likely 70%.
That way the lender has at least some additional protection against a declining market.Seems to me to be a reasonable risk at today’s price levels.[/quote]
this product is just expensive rent with a nasty termination fee.
July 13, 2010 at 10:33 PM #577830patb
Participant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]That’s why I suggest they might not fund these unless the LTV of 75% or better, likely 70%.
That way the lender has at least some additional protection against a declining market.Seems to me to be a reasonable risk at today’s price levels.[/quote]
this product is just expensive rent with a nasty termination fee.
July 13, 2010 at 10:33 PM #578357patb
Participant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]That’s why I suggest they might not fund these unless the LTV of 75% or better, likely 70%.
That way the lender has at least some additional protection against a declining market.Seems to me to be a reasonable risk at today’s price levels.[/quote]
this product is just expensive rent with a nasty termination fee.
July 13, 2010 at 10:33 PM #578463patb
Participant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]That’s why I suggest they might not fund these unless the LTV of 75% or better, likely 70%.
That way the lender has at least some additional protection against a declining market.Seems to me to be a reasonable risk at today’s price levels.[/quote]
this product is just expensive rent with a nasty termination fee.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.