- This topic has 125 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 5 months ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 13, 2010 at 10:08 AM #578389July 13, 2010 at 10:21 AM #5773665yearwaiterParticipant
[quote=jpinpb]We have learned nothing. Gambling is a way of life now.[/quote]
But… but here loser turns a winner in this Gambling. Have you seen such anywhere?
July 13, 2010 at 10:21 AM #5774605yearwaiterParticipant[quote=jpinpb]We have learned nothing. Gambling is a way of life now.[/quote]
But… but here loser turns a winner in this Gambling. Have you seen such anywhere?
July 13, 2010 at 10:21 AM #5779875yearwaiterParticipant[quote=jpinpb]We have learned nothing. Gambling is a way of life now.[/quote]
But… but here loser turns a winner in this Gambling. Have you seen such anywhere?
July 13, 2010 at 10:21 AM #5780935yearwaiterParticipant[quote=jpinpb]We have learned nothing. Gambling is a way of life now.[/quote]
But… but here loser turns a winner in this Gambling. Have you seen such anywhere?
July 13, 2010 at 10:21 AM #5783945yearwaiterParticipant[quote=jpinpb]We have learned nothing. Gambling is a way of life now.[/quote]
But… but here loser turns a winner in this Gambling. Have you seen such anywhere?
July 13, 2010 at 8:02 PM #577686jpinpbParticipantAll the taxpayers are losing, including the homeowners overpaying on their homes. They are subsidizing their own homes (and others) while paying extra for it.
July 13, 2010 at 8:02 PM #577780jpinpbParticipantAll the taxpayers are losing, including the homeowners overpaying on their homes. They are subsidizing their own homes (and others) while paying extra for it.
July 13, 2010 at 8:02 PM #578307jpinpbParticipantAll the taxpayers are losing, including the homeowners overpaying on their homes. They are subsidizing their own homes (and others) while paying extra for it.
July 13, 2010 at 8:02 PM #578413jpinpbParticipantAll the taxpayers are losing, including the homeowners overpaying on their homes. They are subsidizing their own homes (and others) while paying extra for it.
July 13, 2010 at 8:02 PM #578715jpinpbParticipantAll the taxpayers are losing, including the homeowners overpaying on their homes. They are subsidizing their own homes (and others) while paying extra for it.
July 13, 2010 at 10:33 PM #577736patbParticipant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]That’s why I suggest they might not fund these unless the LTV of 75% or better, likely 70%.
That way the lender has at least some additional protection against a declining market.Seems to me to be a reasonable risk at today’s price levels.[/quote]
this product is just expensive rent with a nasty termination fee.
July 13, 2010 at 10:33 PM #577830patbParticipant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]That’s why I suggest they might not fund these unless the LTV of 75% or better, likely 70%.
That way the lender has at least some additional protection against a declining market.Seems to me to be a reasonable risk at today’s price levels.[/quote]
this product is just expensive rent with a nasty termination fee.
July 13, 2010 at 10:33 PM #578357patbParticipant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]That’s why I suggest they might not fund these unless the LTV of 75% or better, likely 70%.
That way the lender has at least some additional protection against a declining market.Seems to me to be a reasonable risk at today’s price levels.[/quote]
this product is just expensive rent with a nasty termination fee.
July 13, 2010 at 10:33 PM #578463patbParticipant[quote=FormerSanDiegan]That’s why I suggest they might not fund these unless the LTV of 75% or better, likely 70%.
That way the lender has at least some additional protection against a declining market.Seems to me to be a reasonable risk at today’s price levels.[/quote]
this product is just expensive rent with a nasty termination fee.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.