- This topic has 1,215 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 10, 2009 at 12:21 PM #480810November 10, 2009 at 1:08 PM #480026
Aecetia
ParticipantShades of George Bush-
Maybe because Hasan was said to be dead initially? …“President Obama began his weekly Internet and radio address on Saturday with these words: ‘This past Thursday, on a clear Texas afternoon, an Army psychiatrist walked into the Soldier Readiness Processing Center, and began shooting his fellow soldiers.'”
“Did the president, speaking directly about the man suspected in the killings, prejudice any jury that might be called to hear the case? At the least, he appeared to fall afoul of a lesson that every journalism student — and law student — learns early: The safest way to avoid yourself some trouble is to couch such a flat assertion of guilt.”
Obama’s media guys need to be 86’d.
November 10, 2009 at 1:08 PM #480194ParticipantShades of George Bush-
Maybe because Hasan was said to be dead initially? …“President Obama began his weekly Internet and radio address on Saturday with these words: ‘This past Thursday, on a clear Texas afternoon, an Army psychiatrist walked into the Soldier Readiness Processing Center, and began shooting his fellow soldiers.'”
“Did the president, speaking directly about the man suspected in the killings, prejudice any jury that might be called to hear the case? At the least, he appeared to fall afoul of a lesson that every journalism student — and law student — learns early: The safest way to avoid yourself some trouble is to couch such a flat assertion of guilt.”
Obama’s media guys need to be 86’d.
November 10, 2009 at 1:08 PM #480550ParticipantShades of George Bush-
Maybe because Hasan was said to be dead initially? …“President Obama began his weekly Internet and radio address on Saturday with these words: ‘This past Thursday, on a clear Texas afternoon, an Army psychiatrist walked into the Soldier Readiness Processing Center, and began shooting his fellow soldiers.'”
“Did the president, speaking directly about the man suspected in the killings, prejudice any jury that might be called to hear the case? At the least, he appeared to fall afoul of a lesson that every journalism student — and law student — learns early: The safest way to avoid yourself some trouble is to couch such a flat assertion of guilt.”
Obama’s media guys need to be 86’d.
November 10, 2009 at 1:08 PM #480633ParticipantShades of George Bush-
Maybe because Hasan was said to be dead initially? …“President Obama began his weekly Internet and radio address on Saturday with these words: ‘This past Thursday, on a clear Texas afternoon, an Army psychiatrist walked into the Soldier Readiness Processing Center, and began shooting his fellow soldiers.'”
“Did the president, speaking directly about the man suspected in the killings, prejudice any jury that might be called to hear the case? At the least, he appeared to fall afoul of a lesson that every journalism student — and law student — learns early: The safest way to avoid yourself some trouble is to couch such a flat assertion of guilt.”
Obama’s media guys need to be 86’d.
November 10, 2009 at 1:08 PM #480854ParticipantShades of George Bush-
Maybe because Hasan was said to be dead initially? …“President Obama began his weekly Internet and radio address on Saturday with these words: ‘This past Thursday, on a clear Texas afternoon, an Army psychiatrist walked into the Soldier Readiness Processing Center, and began shooting his fellow soldiers.'”
“Did the president, speaking directly about the man suspected in the killings, prejudice any jury that might be called to hear the case? At the least, he appeared to fall afoul of a lesson that every journalism student — and law student — learns early: The safest way to avoid yourself some trouble is to couch such a flat assertion of guilt.”
Obama’s media guys need to be 86’d.
November 10, 2009 at 1:29 PM #480031briansd1
GuestAllan, I was very fond of the Three Musketeers.
The intrigues and machinations of Cardinal Richelieu and Cardinal Mazarin are what make a real statesmen.
I think that Torquemada was a nut. He contributed greatly to the decline of the Spanish empire.
November 10, 2009 at 1:29 PM #480199GuestAllan, I was very fond of the Three Musketeers.
The intrigues and machinations of Cardinal Richelieu and Cardinal Mazarin are what make a real statesmen.
I think that Torquemada was a nut. He contributed greatly to the decline of the Spanish empire.
November 10, 2009 at 1:29 PM #480555GuestAllan, I was very fond of the Three Musketeers.
The intrigues and machinations of Cardinal Richelieu and Cardinal Mazarin are what make a real statesmen.
I think that Torquemada was a nut. He contributed greatly to the decline of the Spanish empire.
November 10, 2009 at 1:29 PM #480638GuestAllan, I was very fond of the Three Musketeers.
The intrigues and machinations of Cardinal Richelieu and Cardinal Mazarin are what make a real statesmen.
I think that Torquemada was a nut. He contributed greatly to the decline of the Spanish empire.
November 10, 2009 at 1:29 PM #480859GuestAllan, I was very fond of the Three Musketeers.
The intrigues and machinations of Cardinal Richelieu and Cardinal Mazarin are what make a real statesmen.
I think that Torquemada was a nut. He contributed greatly to the decline of the Spanish empire.
November 10, 2009 at 3:04 PM #480123sdduuuude
ParticipantTerrorism is attemping to control specific people or society in general using terror.
Terrorism requires not only an act of violence, but a request made to other potential victims.
That is – if I just kill a bunch of people then go away, I’m not a terrorsist.
But if I kill a bunch of people, then say “free my bretheren from prison or I’ll kill again” then that’s terrorism.
Has nothing to do with Muslim or not Muslim. The quesiton is – what was this guy trying to accomplish and did he demand anything first ?
November 10, 2009 at 3:04 PM #480290ParticipantTerrorism is attemping to control specific people or society in general using terror.
Terrorism requires not only an act of violence, but a request made to other potential victims.
That is – if I just kill a bunch of people then go away, I’m not a terrorsist.
But if I kill a bunch of people, then say “free my bretheren from prison or I’ll kill again” then that’s terrorism.
Has nothing to do with Muslim or not Muslim. The quesiton is – what was this guy trying to accomplish and did he demand anything first ?
November 10, 2009 at 3:04 PM #480649ParticipantTerrorism is attemping to control specific people or society in general using terror.
Terrorism requires not only an act of violence, but a request made to other potential victims.
That is – if I just kill a bunch of people then go away, I’m not a terrorsist.
But if I kill a bunch of people, then say “free my bretheren from prison or I’ll kill again” then that’s terrorism.
Has nothing to do with Muslim or not Muslim. The quesiton is – what was this guy trying to accomplish and did he demand anything first ?
November 10, 2009 at 3:04 PM #480732ParticipantTerrorism is attemping to control specific people or society in general using terror.
Terrorism requires not only an act of violence, but a request made to other potential victims.
That is – if I just kill a bunch of people then go away, I’m not a terrorsist.
But if I kill a bunch of people, then say “free my bretheren from prison or I’ll kill again” then that’s terrorism.
Has nothing to do with Muslim or not Muslim. The quesiton is – what was this guy trying to accomplish and did he demand anything first ?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.