- This topic has 680 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 9 months ago by jstoesz.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 9, 2011 at 2:55 PM #665236February 10, 2011 at 7:41 AM #664214AnonymousGuest
But there’s no need to fact check when Rupert reports it:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704513104575256734081528528.html
Now you can heed it without question, as the Holy Word of God.
Of course you can always change the meaning of the word “deficit” to suit you political views.
These days, the meaning of many words change depending upon who is in office.
February 10, 2011 at 7:41 AM #664276AnonymousGuestBut there’s no need to fact check when Rupert reports it:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704513104575256734081528528.html
Now you can heed it without question, as the Holy Word of God.
Of course you can always change the meaning of the word “deficit” to suit you political views.
These days, the meaning of many words change depending upon who is in office.
February 10, 2011 at 7:41 AM #664882AnonymousGuestBut there’s no need to fact check when Rupert reports it:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704513104575256734081528528.html
Now you can heed it without question, as the Holy Word of God.
Of course you can always change the meaning of the word “deficit” to suit you political views.
These days, the meaning of many words change depending upon who is in office.
February 10, 2011 at 7:41 AM #665018AnonymousGuestBut there’s no need to fact check when Rupert reports it:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704513104575256734081528528.html
Now you can heed it without question, as the Holy Word of God.
Of course you can always change the meaning of the word “deficit” to suit you political views.
These days, the meaning of many words change depending upon who is in office.
February 10, 2011 at 7:41 AM #665354AnonymousGuestBut there’s no need to fact check when Rupert reports it:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704513104575256734081528528.html
Now you can heed it without question, as the Holy Word of God.
Of course you can always change the meaning of the word “deficit” to suit you political views.
These days, the meaning of many words change depending upon who is in office.
February 10, 2011 at 8:51 AM #664234DjshakesParticipantLooking at that interactive map is scary. Our government is trying to do too much. We can’t afford everything they want to do. People get used to those services after they are implemented and then they become “necessary”. Repeat cycle.
February 10, 2011 at 8:51 AM #664296DjshakesParticipantLooking at that interactive map is scary. Our government is trying to do too much. We can’t afford everything they want to do. People get used to those services after they are implemented and then they become “necessary”. Repeat cycle.
February 10, 2011 at 8:51 AM #664902DjshakesParticipantLooking at that interactive map is scary. Our government is trying to do too much. We can’t afford everything they want to do. People get used to those services after they are implemented and then they become “necessary”. Repeat cycle.
February 10, 2011 at 8:51 AM #665038DjshakesParticipantLooking at that interactive map is scary. Our government is trying to do too much. We can’t afford everything they want to do. People get used to those services after they are implemented and then they become “necessary”. Repeat cycle.
February 10, 2011 at 8:51 AM #665374DjshakesParticipantLooking at that interactive map is scary. Our government is trying to do too much. We can’t afford everything they want to do. People get used to those services after they are implemented and then they become “necessary”. Repeat cycle.
February 11, 2011 at 1:48 AM #664584stockstradrParticipantI agree CA teachers are overpaid, along with so many other fat (taxpayer funded) state/local salaries for police, firefighters..etc.
My wife only got her teaching degree in like 2007. Now she’s making 75K/year and she gets 3.5 months vacation each year PLUS her benefit package is AT LEAST $20,000/year equivalent richer than my private sector job benefits package. Plus of course CA taxpayers are funding her growing pension package.
The only thing I had better acknowledge is that her particular pay scale is a bit higher because she teaches in one of the higher paying districts in the Bay Area. She also has a graduate degree and multiple teaching “credential” certificates, each of which bumps up her pay under CA teachers pay rules.
I’m a Masters-degreed engineer with a strong 20-year resume working for big name Blue Chips, and I’m making $120K/year not including profit sharing and options. And I work my ass off for 60 hrs a week with maybe 3 weeks vacation.
I look at her salary and 3.5 months vacation and I think she’s getting a better deal than me. She’s overpaid! I would become a teacher (if CA actually was hiring teachers, which it isn’t)
I’m not stupid, so naturally I got myself listed under her FREE (to us) rich cushy benefits package (health, dental, vision, etc) not my employer’s lame (yet high out of pocket cost) private sector package. So you taxpayers are even paying for my health care package because I’m a teacher’s spouse!
February 11, 2011 at 1:48 AM #664646stockstradrParticipantI agree CA teachers are overpaid, along with so many other fat (taxpayer funded) state/local salaries for police, firefighters..etc.
My wife only got her teaching degree in like 2007. Now she’s making 75K/year and she gets 3.5 months vacation each year PLUS her benefit package is AT LEAST $20,000/year equivalent richer than my private sector job benefits package. Plus of course CA taxpayers are funding her growing pension package.
The only thing I had better acknowledge is that her particular pay scale is a bit higher because she teaches in one of the higher paying districts in the Bay Area. She also has a graduate degree and multiple teaching “credential” certificates, each of which bumps up her pay under CA teachers pay rules.
I’m a Masters-degreed engineer with a strong 20-year resume working for big name Blue Chips, and I’m making $120K/year not including profit sharing and options. And I work my ass off for 60 hrs a week with maybe 3 weeks vacation.
I look at her salary and 3.5 months vacation and I think she’s getting a better deal than me. She’s overpaid! I would become a teacher (if CA actually was hiring teachers, which it isn’t)
I’m not stupid, so naturally I got myself listed under her FREE (to us) rich cushy benefits package (health, dental, vision, etc) not my employer’s lame (yet high out of pocket cost) private sector package. So you taxpayers are even paying for my health care package because I’m a teacher’s spouse!
February 11, 2011 at 1:48 AM #665249stockstradrParticipantI agree CA teachers are overpaid, along with so many other fat (taxpayer funded) state/local salaries for police, firefighters..etc.
My wife only got her teaching degree in like 2007. Now she’s making 75K/year and she gets 3.5 months vacation each year PLUS her benefit package is AT LEAST $20,000/year equivalent richer than my private sector job benefits package. Plus of course CA taxpayers are funding her growing pension package.
The only thing I had better acknowledge is that her particular pay scale is a bit higher because she teaches in one of the higher paying districts in the Bay Area. She also has a graduate degree and multiple teaching “credential” certificates, each of which bumps up her pay under CA teachers pay rules.
I’m a Masters-degreed engineer with a strong 20-year resume working for big name Blue Chips, and I’m making $120K/year not including profit sharing and options. And I work my ass off for 60 hrs a week with maybe 3 weeks vacation.
I look at her salary and 3.5 months vacation and I think she’s getting a better deal than me. She’s overpaid! I would become a teacher (if CA actually was hiring teachers, which it isn’t)
I’m not stupid, so naturally I got myself listed under her FREE (to us) rich cushy benefits package (health, dental, vision, etc) not my employer’s lame (yet high out of pocket cost) private sector package. So you taxpayers are even paying for my health care package because I’m a teacher’s spouse!
February 11, 2011 at 1:48 AM #665385stockstradrParticipantI agree CA teachers are overpaid, along with so many other fat (taxpayer funded) state/local salaries for police, firefighters..etc.
My wife only got her teaching degree in like 2007. Now she’s making 75K/year and she gets 3.5 months vacation each year PLUS her benefit package is AT LEAST $20,000/year equivalent richer than my private sector job benefits package. Plus of course CA taxpayers are funding her growing pension package.
The only thing I had better acknowledge is that her particular pay scale is a bit higher because she teaches in one of the higher paying districts in the Bay Area. She also has a graduate degree and multiple teaching “credential” certificates, each of which bumps up her pay under CA teachers pay rules.
I’m a Masters-degreed engineer with a strong 20-year resume working for big name Blue Chips, and I’m making $120K/year not including profit sharing and options. And I work my ass off for 60 hrs a week with maybe 3 weeks vacation.
I look at her salary and 3.5 months vacation and I think she’s getting a better deal than me. She’s overpaid! I would become a teacher (if CA actually was hiring teachers, which it isn’t)
I’m not stupid, so naturally I got myself listed under her FREE (to us) rich cushy benefits package (health, dental, vision, etc) not my employer’s lame (yet high out of pocket cost) private sector package. So you taxpayers are even paying for my health care package because I’m a teacher’s spouse!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.