Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Sunrise powerlink project
- This topic has 50 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by
Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 12, 2008 at 8:20 AM #152347February 12, 2008 at 10:08 AM #152076
hawk
ParticipantI work in Government and just spoke with SDG&E about Sunrise last week. The CA Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)designated that the preferred route in the Draft Environmental Impact Report excludes Penasquitos entirely and wants it to run through Miramar Road. Additionally, if for some reason the route changed again and it went through PQ, the Council District negotiated with SDG&E to commit to undergrounding that portion of the line.
February 12, 2008 at 10:08 AM #152444ParticipantI work in Government and just spoke with SDG&E about Sunrise last week. The CA Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)designated that the preferred route in the Draft Environmental Impact Report excludes Penasquitos entirely and wants it to run through Miramar Road. Additionally, if for some reason the route changed again and it went through PQ, the Council District negotiated with SDG&E to commit to undergrounding that portion of the line.
February 12, 2008 at 10:08 AM #152372ParticipantI work in Government and just spoke with SDG&E about Sunrise last week. The CA Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)designated that the preferred route in the Draft Environmental Impact Report excludes Penasquitos entirely and wants it to run through Miramar Road. Additionally, if for some reason the route changed again and it went through PQ, the Council District negotiated with SDG&E to commit to undergrounding that portion of the line.
February 12, 2008 at 10:08 AM #152351ParticipantI work in Government and just spoke with SDG&E about Sunrise last week. The CA Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)designated that the preferred route in the Draft Environmental Impact Report excludes Penasquitos entirely and wants it to run through Miramar Road. Additionally, if for some reason the route changed again and it went through PQ, the Council District negotiated with SDG&E to commit to undergrounding that portion of the line.
February 12, 2008 at 10:08 AM #152344ParticipantI work in Government and just spoke with SDG&E about Sunrise last week. The CA Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)designated that the preferred route in the Draft Environmental Impact Report excludes Penasquitos entirely and wants it to run through Miramar Road. Additionally, if for some reason the route changed again and it went through PQ, the Council District negotiated with SDG&E to commit to undergrounding that portion of the line.
February 12, 2008 at 1:15 PM #152232Anonymous
Guest“Not an RF engineer, but I believe it’s safer to be further away from the base station, as i recall the power is inverse proportional to the distance squared.”
Indeed it is in free space. Assuming the input transmission power provided to the antenna is held constant.
It is so with radio and TV, which emit thousands of watts.
The point is that cell phones are different in fundamental ways: there is two way, not one way communication, both transmitters continuously adjust their emitted physical power over a very wide range to compensate for the distance between the two (this is not widely appreciated or understood), and the transmitter near your head is the most hazardous one.
February 12, 2008 at 1:15 PM #152501Guest“Not an RF engineer, but I believe it’s safer to be further away from the base station, as i recall the power is inverse proportional to the distance squared.”
Indeed it is in free space. Assuming the input transmission power provided to the antenna is held constant.
It is so with radio and TV, which emit thousands of watts.
The point is that cell phones are different in fundamental ways: there is two way, not one way communication, both transmitters continuously adjust their emitted physical power over a very wide range to compensate for the distance between the two (this is not widely appreciated or understood), and the transmitter near your head is the most hazardous one.
February 12, 2008 at 1:15 PM #152506Guest“Not an RF engineer, but I believe it’s safer to be further away from the base station, as i recall the power is inverse proportional to the distance squared.”
Indeed it is in free space. Assuming the input transmission power provided to the antenna is held constant.
It is so with radio and TV, which emit thousands of watts.
The point is that cell phones are different in fundamental ways: there is two way, not one way communication, both transmitters continuously adjust their emitted physical power over a very wide range to compensate for the distance between the two (this is not widely appreciated or understood), and the transmitter near your head is the most hazardous one.
February 12, 2008 at 1:15 PM #152528Guest“Not an RF engineer, but I believe it’s safer to be further away from the base station, as i recall the power is inverse proportional to the distance squared.”
Indeed it is in free space. Assuming the input transmission power provided to the antenna is held constant.
It is so with radio and TV, which emit thousands of watts.
The point is that cell phones are different in fundamental ways: there is two way, not one way communication, both transmitters continuously adjust their emitted physical power over a very wide range to compensate for the distance between the two (this is not widely appreciated or understood), and the transmitter near your head is the most hazardous one.
February 12, 2008 at 1:15 PM #152600Guest“Not an RF engineer, but I believe it’s safer to be further away from the base station, as i recall the power is inverse proportional to the distance squared.”
Indeed it is in free space. Assuming the input transmission power provided to the antenna is held constant.
It is so with radio and TV, which emit thousands of watts.
The point is that cell phones are different in fundamental ways: there is two way, not one way communication, both transmitters continuously adjust their emitted physical power over a very wide range to compensate for the distance between the two (this is not widely appreciated or understood), and the transmitter near your head is the most hazardous one.
February 12, 2008 at 1:19 PM #152237patientlywaiting
ParticipantI know nothing about RF. How does a home wifi network affect exposure to radiation? I have two of those routers at home.
February 12, 2008 at 1:19 PM #152507ParticipantI know nothing about RF. How does a home wifi network affect exposure to radiation? I have two of those routers at home.
February 12, 2008 at 1:19 PM #152511ParticipantI know nothing about RF. How does a home wifi network affect exposure to radiation? I have two of those routers at home.
February 12, 2008 at 1:19 PM #152533ParticipantI know nothing about RF. How does a home wifi network affect exposure to radiation? I have two of those routers at home.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.