Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Sunrise powerlink project
- This topic has 50 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 10, 2008 at 11:22 PM #151340February 11, 2008 at 9:59 PM #151778newcomerParticipant
with 20+ years in wireless telecom, I would have the same concerns as fat_lazy_union if I spotted the tx antenna facing towards my future residence, and I would take the same action as fat_lazy_union did.
Some antennas, such as those used for radio and television broadcast transmissions, use power levels that are much higher than those used for cellular and PCS antennas – base stations. Even though all broadcast stations are required to demonstrate compliance with FCC safety guidelines, in some cases there could be a potential for higher levels of RF exposure.
February 11, 2008 at 9:59 PM #152138newcomerParticipantwith 20+ years in wireless telecom, I would have the same concerns as fat_lazy_union if I spotted the tx antenna facing towards my future residence, and I would take the same action as fat_lazy_union did.
Some antennas, such as those used for radio and television broadcast transmissions, use power levels that are much higher than those used for cellular and PCS antennas – base stations. Even though all broadcast stations are required to demonstrate compliance with FCC safety guidelines, in some cases there could be a potential for higher levels of RF exposure.
February 11, 2008 at 9:59 PM #152045newcomerParticipantwith 20+ years in wireless telecom, I would have the same concerns as fat_lazy_union if I spotted the tx antenna facing towards my future residence, and I would take the same action as fat_lazy_union did.
Some antennas, such as those used for radio and television broadcast transmissions, use power levels that are much higher than those used for cellular and PCS antennas – base stations. Even though all broadcast stations are required to demonstrate compliance with FCC safety guidelines, in some cases there could be a potential for higher levels of RF exposure.
February 11, 2008 at 9:59 PM #152052newcomerParticipantwith 20+ years in wireless telecom, I would have the same concerns as fat_lazy_union if I spotted the tx antenna facing towards my future residence, and I would take the same action as fat_lazy_union did.
Some antennas, such as those used for radio and television broadcast transmissions, use power levels that are much higher than those used for cellular and PCS antennas – base stations. Even though all broadcast stations are required to demonstrate compliance with FCC safety guidelines, in some cases there could be a potential for higher levels of RF exposure.
February 11, 2008 at 9:59 PM #152068newcomerParticipantwith 20+ years in wireless telecom, I would have the same concerns as fat_lazy_union if I spotted the tx antenna facing towards my future residence, and I would take the same action as fat_lazy_union did.
Some antennas, such as those used for radio and television broadcast transmissions, use power levels that are much higher than those used for cellular and PCS antennas – base stations. Even though all broadcast stations are required to demonstrate compliance with FCC safety guidelines, in some cases there could be a potential for higher levels of RF exposure.
February 11, 2008 at 10:18 PM #152128not-so-average-joeParticipantFLU et al.
Thanks a lot for sharing your wisdom. Will have to
consult you again on how to shield my home (or at
least my skull) if I ever buy in near there. πNot so average Joe
February 11, 2008 at 10:18 PM #152200not-so-average-joeParticipantFLU et al.
Thanks a lot for sharing your wisdom. Will have to
consult you again on how to shield my home (or at
least my skull) if I ever buy in near there. πNot so average Joe
February 11, 2008 at 10:18 PM #152112not-so-average-joeParticipantFLU et al.
Thanks a lot for sharing your wisdom. Will have to
consult you again on how to shield my home (or at
least my skull) if I ever buy in near there. πNot so average Joe
February 11, 2008 at 10:18 PM #152105not-so-average-joeParticipantFLU et al.
Thanks a lot for sharing your wisdom. Will have to
consult you again on how to shield my home (or at
least my skull) if I ever buy in near there. πNot so average Joe
February 11, 2008 at 10:18 PM #151838not-so-average-joeParticipantFLU et al.
Thanks a lot for sharing your wisdom. Will have to
consult you again on how to shield my home (or at
least my skull) if I ever buy in near there. πNot so average Joe
February 12, 2008 at 8:20 AM #151981Alex_angelParticipantHahahaha. They are worried about attenas but probably all chatter on their cell phones all day. You can’t escape it by not living in CV.
February 12, 2008 at 8:20 AM #152248Alex_angelParticipantHahahaha. They are worried about attenas but probably all chatter on their cell phones all day. You can’t escape it by not living in CV.
February 12, 2008 at 8:20 AM #152255Alex_angelParticipantHahahaha. They are worried about attenas but probably all chatter on their cell phones all day. You can’t escape it by not living in CV.
February 12, 2008 at 8:20 AM #152273Alex_angelParticipantHahahaha. They are worried about attenas but probably all chatter on their cell phones all day. You can’t escape it by not living in CV.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.