Sore loser in the bidding war

[bearishgurl]

Rowe Petition for Rehearing denied last week:

http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/dockets.cfm?dist=41&doc_id=2044572&doc_no=D063847

2 out of 3, Justice McDonald in favor of review (the lone dissenter in the opn).

Sevilla has until Friday (5/2) to petition the Supreme Court for review of the appellate court’s decision to reverse the trial court’s decision to throw the People’s case out. Don’t think for a minute that he won’t go there.

Rowe must have had the funds thus far to keep Sevilla going.

Onward and upward, folks . . .

[bearishgurl]

[quote=bearishgurl]Sevilla has until Monday (the 14th) to file a Petition for Review:

http://www.courts.ca.gov/7260.htm?title=eight&linkid=rule8_500

Don’t discount this step. He’s “comfortable” doing so.[/quote]

Sorry, I erred here and was using the wrong language. I was using the “10-day filing rule” above a for Petition for Review but the Petition for Rehearing comes before the Petition for Review.

http://www.courts.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=eight&linkid=rule8_268

A losing party in a CA Appellate District must petition the same court to “re-hear” the case PRIOR to proceeding to a Petition for Review. They have 15 days to do so. If the 13th, 14th and/or 15th day falls on a Sat, Sun or holiday, the Petition is due to the court on the last business day prior to the deadline weekend day or holiday. In this case, the 4th DCA rendered their opinion on 4/4/14. 15 days from that is 4/19/14 (Sat). Sevilla/Rowe filed their Petition for Rehearing on 4/18 (Fri).

The Court’s Denial of their Petition for Rehearing was on 4/24/14 and they only have 10 days to Petition the Supreme Court for review. Thus, their Petition for Review is due 5/4 (Sun) and can be filed no later than 5/2 (Fri).

I apologize for any confusion this may have caused.

[FlyerInHi]

CAr, katty kay and Claire shipman have a new book out.

they said that women lack the confidence of men and they ruminate over minor issues. I’m not going to read the book but their comments in interviews pretty much confirm my own observations.

BTW, I don’t have strong beliefs concerning this… I’m willing to change my mind.

[bearishgurl]

brian, not ALL women “lack the confidence of men” and “ruminate over minor issues.” A LOT of women who came of working age in a “man’s world,” attempting for years to penetrate a “glass ceiling” are VERY confident. But the bulk of these women are likely “retired” by now.

Rowe is around 53-54 by now. She’s not exactly in the age group I’m referring to above but close … I don’t think either of your comments pertain to her. I think she became a more than a little batshit crazy taking constant care of her profoundly developmentally-disabled daughter without too much help from her spouse all the while holding down a FT job and became burned out and resentful of this.

I’m not making excuses for her and I’m no psychiatrist but on the whole, her actions in this case strike me as having germinated from a combination of untreated severe depression, boredom and her fantastical delusions stemming from untreated borderline or bipolar personality disorder.

I don’t know if her actions were based entirely (or at all) on “revenge” as there are SO MANY available properties in this county that could have served she and her family’s needs. I think the people who ended up getting their offer accepted on a home that Rowe bid on were just “handy victims” for this sordid exercise and she had met them and knew a few things about them and where they lived. And since they didn’t really know her, maybe she felt they would never suspect her.

Still, there is no excuse for pulling all these stunts in an effort to (indirectly) harm or scare another person.

[krowe]

I came across your discussion today and you have many very pertinent questions I would be happy to answer. There is a great deal of misinformation in the news and I am happy to address what really happened and why the 2 prior judges ruled the way they did.

If you would prefer I leave, please just let me know and I will. I understand people are very uncomfortable when I am around now.

Thank you bearishgurl for your great insight.

Kathy Rowe

[CA renter]

If you are indeed Kathy Rowe, please feel free to explain your side of this story.

[Anonymous]

This thread just got creepy.

[jeff303]

There’s no way in hell the poster is the same person referenced in the article. Posting details of the case to a public message board with charges pending? Please.

[krowe]

I am a long time reader/fan of this website and Rich Toscano, which is how I ran across this thread.

There are 3 court hearing transcripts (just the preliminary hearing one is 115 pages) which are public knowledge and I am happy to discuss anything in the public domain. There are only a few things I am not able to discuss yet. My attorney and I have consistently been an open book to the DA so there is nothing that I am afraid of them finding out.

I do understand the aversion to me…I get that reaction frequently now. I don’t want to intrude on your group, just wanted to offer answers to your questions if you wanted.

Thank you,
Kathy

[scaredyclassic]

Hi krowe! Welcome!

I do have a few questions

1. G-d. Actually exists or just pretend?
2. Afterlife. Yes or no?
3. Ballpark estimate on gold price 12/31/14
4. Housing prices. Near term peak?

[zk]

[quote=scaredyclassic]Hi krowe! Welcome!

I do have a few questions

1. G-d. Actually exists or just pretend?
2. Afterlife. Yes or no?
3. Ballpark estimate on gold price 12/31/14
4. Housing prices. Near term peak?[/quote]

Yeah, and when will the Cubs win the World Series?

And, life’s other great mystery (it even had Freud stumped): What do women want? Oh, wait, you already answered that one.

[Coronita]

.

[Coronita]

.

[Coronita]

.

[Coronita]

.

[Author]

Posts