Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Shiller a long-term semi bull ?
- This topic has 70 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by peterb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 3, 2008 at 1:31 PM #297505November 3, 2008 at 3:22 PM #297620peterbParticipant
Yes, unfortunately, Rich is not immune. The last two investing reports on “gold and gold stocks” as well as the “US stock market is now priced for good returns” are a little off target, IMO. Gold had broken-down 6 months ago and will continue to break down for a while yet. The US stock market may enjoy this reaction cycle, but it wont last more than a few months before all the overwhelming bad news smashes it to new lows. The best and safest place to be right now is in the US$. This will probably be true for another 6 or more months. Check with Marc Faber and Bob Hoye for a historical perspective on where we’re at and headed. 2009 is going to be one for the record books and I dont mean that in a good way.
November 3, 2008 at 3:22 PM #297967peterbParticipantYes, unfortunately, Rich is not immune. The last two investing reports on “gold and gold stocks” as well as the “US stock market is now priced for good returns” are a little off target, IMO. Gold had broken-down 6 months ago and will continue to break down for a while yet. The US stock market may enjoy this reaction cycle, but it wont last more than a few months before all the overwhelming bad news smashes it to new lows. The best and safest place to be right now is in the US$. This will probably be true for another 6 or more months. Check with Marc Faber and Bob Hoye for a historical perspective on where we’re at and headed. 2009 is going to be one for the record books and I dont mean that in a good way.
November 3, 2008 at 3:22 PM #297980peterbParticipantYes, unfortunately, Rich is not immune. The last two investing reports on “gold and gold stocks” as well as the “US stock market is now priced for good returns” are a little off target, IMO. Gold had broken-down 6 months ago and will continue to break down for a while yet. The US stock market may enjoy this reaction cycle, but it wont last more than a few months before all the overwhelming bad news smashes it to new lows. The best and safest place to be right now is in the US$. This will probably be true for another 6 or more months. Check with Marc Faber and Bob Hoye for a historical perspective on where we’re at and headed. 2009 is going to be one for the record books and I dont mean that in a good way.
November 3, 2008 at 3:22 PM #298040peterbParticipantYes, unfortunately, Rich is not immune. The last two investing reports on “gold and gold stocks” as well as the “US stock market is now priced for good returns” are a little off target, IMO. Gold had broken-down 6 months ago and will continue to break down for a while yet. The US stock market may enjoy this reaction cycle, but it wont last more than a few months before all the overwhelming bad news smashes it to new lows. The best and safest place to be right now is in the US$. This will probably be true for another 6 or more months. Check with Marc Faber and Bob Hoye for a historical perspective on where we’re at and headed. 2009 is going to be one for the record books and I dont mean that in a good way.
November 3, 2008 at 3:22 PM #297994peterbParticipantYes, unfortunately, Rich is not immune. The last two investing reports on “gold and gold stocks” as well as the “US stock market is now priced for good returns” are a little off target, IMO. Gold had broken-down 6 months ago and will continue to break down for a while yet. The US stock market may enjoy this reaction cycle, but it wont last more than a few months before all the overwhelming bad news smashes it to new lows. The best and safest place to be right now is in the US$. This will probably be true for another 6 or more months. Check with Marc Faber and Bob Hoye for a historical perspective on where we’re at and headed. 2009 is going to be one for the record books and I dont mean that in a good way.
November 3, 2008 at 3:25 PM #297630(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantpeterb, you seem to be focused on 3-6 month trends.
Shiller tends to focus on decadal time scales.
November 3, 2008 at 3:25 PM #298051(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantpeterb, you seem to be focused on 3-6 month trends.
Shiller tends to focus on decadal time scales.
November 3, 2008 at 3:25 PM #297977(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantpeterb, you seem to be focused on 3-6 month trends.
Shiller tends to focus on decadal time scales.
November 3, 2008 at 3:25 PM #297991(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantpeterb, you seem to be focused on 3-6 month trends.
Shiller tends to focus on decadal time scales.
November 3, 2008 at 3:25 PM #298004(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantpeterb, you seem to be focused on 3-6 month trends.
Shiller tends to focus on decadal time scales.
November 3, 2008 at 3:28 PM #297640NotCrankyParticipantHey, I was just joking peterb.Rich sounds reasonable, with good arguments and fair caveats.
November 3, 2008 at 3:28 PM #298061NotCrankyParticipantHey, I was just joking peterb.Rich sounds reasonable, with good arguments and fair caveats.
November 3, 2008 at 3:28 PM #298014NotCrankyParticipantHey, I was just joking peterb.Rich sounds reasonable, with good arguments and fair caveats.
November 3, 2008 at 3:28 PM #298001NotCrankyParticipantHey, I was just joking peterb.Rich sounds reasonable, with good arguments and fair caveats.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.