Menu

Home › Forums › Other › Semi-Retire in Temecula in 2012

  • This topic has 372 replies, 34 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by joec.
Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 373 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6 … 23 24 25
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 22, 2009 at 10:24 AM #333765
    ice9
    Participant

    [quote=coxapple]Hey, what’s wrong with San Antonio. [/quote]

    Too hot in the summer.

    Property tax is too high.

    No reasonable proximity to oceans or mountains.

    January 22, 2009 at 12:30 PM #333376
    UCGal
    Participant

    Temecula isn’t close to the ocean or mountains if you don’t have a car.

    January 22, 2009 at 12:30 PM #333708
    UCGal
    Participant

    Temecula isn’t close to the ocean or mountains if you don’t have a car.

    January 22, 2009 at 12:30 PM #333792
    UCGal
    Participant

    Temecula isn’t close to the ocean or mountains if you don’t have a car.

    January 22, 2009 at 12:30 PM #333819
    UCGal
    Participant

    Temecula isn’t close to the ocean or mountains if you don’t have a car.

    January 22, 2009 at 12:30 PM #333905
    UCGal
    Participant

    Temecula isn’t close to the ocean or mountains if you don’t have a car.

    January 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM #333421
    ice9
    Participant

    [quote=UCGal]Temecula isn’t close to the ocean or mountains if you don’t have a car. [/quote]

    I don’t expect to visit the beach or mountains all the time. Maybe every other week-end or something, and a rental would suffice for that.

    January 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM #333753
    ice9
    Participant

    [quote=UCGal]Temecula isn’t close to the ocean or mountains if you don’t have a car. [/quote]

    I don’t expect to visit the beach or mountains all the time. Maybe every other week-end or something, and a rental would suffice for that.

    January 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM #333837
    ice9
    Participant

    [quote=UCGal]Temecula isn’t close to the ocean or mountains if you don’t have a car. [/quote]

    I don’t expect to visit the beach or mountains all the time. Maybe every other week-end or something, and a rental would suffice for that.

    January 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM #333864
    ice9
    Participant

    [quote=UCGal]Temecula isn’t close to the ocean or mountains if you don’t have a car. [/quote]

    I don’t expect to visit the beach or mountains all the time. Maybe every other week-end or something, and a rental would suffice for that.

    January 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM #333950
    ice9
    Participant

    [quote=UCGal]Temecula isn’t close to the ocean or mountains if you don’t have a car. [/quote]

    I don’t expect to visit the beach or mountains all the time. Maybe every other week-end or something, and a rental would suffice for that.

    January 22, 2009 at 2:15 PM #333436
    barnaby33
    Participant

    I’d say that based on your requirements, Mission Hills, Hillcrest and Northpark are indeed more what you are looking for. Its pretty much the only place in SD where you can live without a car. Even downtown requires a car to get around more than Hillcrest. Its not going to be 100 a square though, not for anything nice and certainly not in that price range.
    Josh

    January 22, 2009 at 2:15 PM #333768
    barnaby33
    Participant

    I’d say that based on your requirements, Mission Hills, Hillcrest and Northpark are indeed more what you are looking for. Its pretty much the only place in SD where you can live without a car. Even downtown requires a car to get around more than Hillcrest. Its not going to be 100 a square though, not for anything nice and certainly not in that price range.
    Josh

    January 22, 2009 at 2:15 PM #333852
    barnaby33
    Participant

    I’d say that based on your requirements, Mission Hills, Hillcrest and Northpark are indeed more what you are looking for. Its pretty much the only place in SD where you can live without a car. Even downtown requires a car to get around more than Hillcrest. Its not going to be 100 a square though, not for anything nice and certainly not in that price range.
    Josh

    January 22, 2009 at 2:15 PM #333879
    barnaby33
    Participant

    I’d say that based on your requirements, Mission Hills, Hillcrest and Northpark are indeed more what you are looking for. Its pretty much the only place in SD where you can live without a car. Even downtown requires a car to get around more than Hillcrest. Its not going to be 100 a square though, not for anything nice and certainly not in that price range.
    Josh

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 373 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6 … 23 24 25
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.