Schiff- Crash Proof

[kewp]

Jeremy Rifkin makes some interesting observations below:

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0817-08.htm

Brilliant article! Can’t say I disagree with it at all. Even as a patriot I’ve often said that we could learn much from the EU.

I love America, but I’m gonna try and live like a European as much as I can. Now to just convince the UC system to give staff 6 weeks of paid vacation per year…

[patientlywaiting]

Interesting article on the Eurepean Dream.

So Mexico is part of North America. Why not allow Mexicans to come and work in USA and then return home just like Eastern Europeans do in Western Europe? United States of North America? The retirees can go to Mexico to enjoy the sunshine and domestic help.

[patientlywaiting]

Interesting article on the Eurepean Dream.

So Mexico is part of North America. Why not allow Mexicans to come and work in USA and then return home just like Eastern Europeans do in Western Europe? United States of North America? The retirees can go to Mexico to enjoy the sunshine and domestic help.

[patientlywaiting]

Interesting article on the Eurepean Dream.

So Mexico is part of North America. Why not allow Mexicans to come and work in USA and then return home just like Eastern Europeans do in Western Europe? United States of North America? The retirees can go to Mexico to enjoy the sunshine and domestic help.

[hipmatt]

October 26, 2007

Send in the Clowns – Peter Schiff

Four leading members of the Bush administration’s economic team, including Ed Lazear, Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors, Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez, Al Hubbard, director of the National Economic Council, and Jim Nussle, director of the Office of Management and Budget, convened on a CNBC panel earlier this week and confidently forecast that the economy would avoid a recession. As they uttered their platitudes, we learned that housing sales plunged again, with national inventories of unsold homes hitting a new record high, and that Merrill Lynch disclosed nearly $8 billion in losses. Set against this backdrop of deteriorating economic news, it would have been more honest, and perhaps more effective, if the Administration team came on stage in clown makeup and oversize shoes.

The group’s most entertaining routine could be described as the “falling dollar hot potato”. It is a testament to the professionalism of CNBC host Dylan Ratigan that he was able to suppress howls of laughter while the economists scrambled to avoid any discussion of the dollar by claiming that only the President and the Secretary of the Treasury were allowed to comment. (Of course the only thing Bush or Paulson will utter on the subject is the all too familiar mantra “a strong dollar is in our national interest.”) How can the leading economic policy makers in government refuse to discuss the value of our money, which is arguably the single most important part of the economy? Why is the subject taboo? Perhaps they feel that anything they say will only inspire less confidence in the dollar? In reality, the Administration is perusing a policy of benign neglect. Today’s break-outs in the prices of gold and silver show that the policy is not going over too well!

In addition to the dollar dance, the wacky economists also provided some laughs on a variety of other subjects.

Regarding the California wildfires, the panel reassured us that the resilient U.S. economy would weather the storm, much as it did with hurricane Katrina. However, as state and federal officials promise unlimited funds to rebuild thousands of burned homes, they conveniently ignore the fact that we must put the tab on our national charge card. The ability to postpone pain by borrowing from abroad is not evidence of economic resilience but vulnerability. A truly resilient economy has ample domestic savings to cover these vicissitudes itself. America has yet to pay the costs associated with a string of natural disasters, the bills for which will likely come due much sooner than anyone seems to realize.

The Administration gang also told us that the American economy will benefit once China moves to an economy based on consumption rather than savings (in other words, more like our economy) as they will finally begin buying more of our products. Although it is true to expect that the Chinese will inevitably start spending more, it is ridiculous to assume that it will benefit the United States. When the Chinese begin spending they will simply snap up their own abundant production and send fewer goods to America. As the Chinese reduce their savings to begin enjoying the fruits of their labor, American borrowers will lose access to their largest source of credit. The two-pronged effect on the American economy will be substantial increases in both consumer prices and interest rates — hardly the benign outcome all the President’s men expect.

None seemed too concerned about the cost of funding the war in Iraq (already more costly than either Korea or Vietnam in inflation adjusted terms), which on the day of this “summit” we learned is now projected to be almost two trillion dollars. Their lack of concern likely reflects their belief that Americans are not the ones picking up the tab. I’m sure there is a different reaction among our foreign creditors, as they contemplate the prospects of “loaning” us that much more money knowing that a declining dollar guarantees they will never be re-paid in full. Perhaps the thought of loaning us endless sums to cope with natural disaster at home and man-made ones abroad will shock foreigners to their collective senses, prompting them to finally cut us off.

On housing we were once again told the problems would be contained. Such upbeat pronouncements should be wearing thin in the face of mounting evidence to the contrary. When will people begin to grasp that the trillions of dollars of mortgage loans financed by Wall Street will never be repaid in full and that the losses for lenders will be staggering?

Homeowners have lenders over a barrel, and soon all will know it. Once the government exempts forgiven mortgage debt from being treated as taxable income, defaults will become a national trend. Under normal circumstances, lenders have all the power, as 20% down payments and an ample supply of qualified buyers makes foreclosure a real threat. However, under current circumstances, it’s completely empty. Lenders can not foreclose as there are no buyers and no equity. If homeowners choose not to pay, lenders really have no choice but to renegotiate the loans. Once homeowners understand this no one will make a mortgage payment until their loan is reduced to an amount more consistent with the actual value of their home.

While homeowners themselves will experience mere paper losses, those of the lenders will be all too real. However, even with less mortgage debt, homeowners will finally wake up to the fact that their home equity is gone. Without it, much like the Chinese today, Americans will consumer a whole lot less and hopefully save a whole lot more.

For a more in depth analysis of the tenuous position of the Americana economy and U.S. dollar denominated investments, read my new book “Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse.”

[hipmatt]

October 26, 2007

Send in the Clowns – Peter Schiff

Four leading members of the Bush administration’s economic team, including Ed Lazear, Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors, Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez, Al Hubbard, director of the National Economic Council, and Jim Nussle, director of the Office of Management and Budget, convened on a CNBC panel earlier this week and confidently forecast that the economy would avoid a recession. As they uttered their platitudes, we learned that housing sales plunged again, with national inventories of unsold homes hitting a new record high, and that Merrill Lynch disclosed nearly $8 billion in losses. Set against this backdrop of deteriorating economic news, it would have been more honest, and perhaps more effective, if the Administration team came on stage in clown makeup and oversize shoes.

The group’s most entertaining routine could be described as the “falling dollar hot potato”. It is a testament to the professionalism of CNBC host Dylan Ratigan that he was able to suppress howls of laughter while the economists scrambled to avoid any discussion of the dollar by claiming that only the President and the Secretary of the Treasury were allowed to comment. (Of course the only thing Bush or Paulson will utter on the subject is the all too familiar mantra “a strong dollar is in our national interest.”) How can the leading economic policy makers in government refuse to discuss the value of our money, which is arguably the single most important part of the economy? Why is the subject taboo? Perhaps they feel that anything they say will only inspire less confidence in the dollar? In reality, the Administration is perusing a policy of benign neglect. Today’s break-outs in the prices of gold and silver show that the policy is not going over too well!

In addition to the dollar dance, the wacky economists also provided some laughs on a variety of other subjects.

Regarding the California wildfires, the panel reassured us that the resilient U.S. economy would weather the storm, much as it did with hurricane Katrina. However, as state and federal officials promise unlimited funds to rebuild thousands of burned homes, they conveniently ignore the fact that we must put the tab on our national charge card. The ability to postpone pain by borrowing from abroad is not evidence of economic resilience but vulnerability. A truly resilient economy has ample domestic savings to cover these vicissitudes itself. America has yet to pay the costs associated with a string of natural disasters, the bills for which will likely come due much sooner than anyone seems to realize.

The Administration gang also told us that the American economy will benefit once China moves to an economy based on consumption rather than savings (in other words, more like our economy) as they will finally begin buying more of our products. Although it is true to expect that the Chinese will inevitably start spending more, it is ridiculous to assume that it will benefit the United States. When the Chinese begin spending they will simply snap up their own abundant production and send fewer goods to America. As the Chinese reduce their savings to begin enjoying the fruits of their labor, American borrowers will lose access to their largest source of credit. The two-pronged effect on the American economy will be substantial increases in both consumer prices and interest rates — hardly the benign outcome all the President’s men expect.

None seemed too concerned about the cost of funding the war in Iraq (already more costly than either Korea or Vietnam in inflation adjusted terms), which on the day of this “summit” we learned is now projected to be almost two trillion dollars. Their lack of concern likely reflects their belief that Americans are not the ones picking up the tab. I’m sure there is a different reaction among our foreign creditors, as they contemplate the prospects of “loaning” us that much more money knowing that a declining dollar guarantees they will never be re-paid in full. Perhaps the thought of loaning us endless sums to cope with natural disaster at home and man-made ones abroad will shock foreigners to their collective senses, prompting them to finally cut us off.

On housing we were once again told the problems would be contained. Such upbeat pronouncements should be wearing thin in the face of mounting evidence to the contrary. When will people begin to grasp that the trillions of dollars of mortgage loans financed by Wall Street will never be repaid in full and that the losses for lenders will be staggering?

Homeowners have lenders over a barrel, and soon all will know it. Once the government exempts forgiven mortgage debt from being treated as taxable income, defaults will become a national trend. Under normal circumstances, lenders have all the power, as 20% down payments and an ample supply of qualified buyers makes foreclosure a real threat. However, under current circumstances, it’s completely empty. Lenders can not foreclose as there are no buyers and no equity. If homeowners choose not to pay, lenders really have no choice but to renegotiate the loans. Once homeowners understand this no one will make a mortgage payment until their loan is reduced to an amount more consistent with the actual value of their home.

While homeowners themselves will experience mere paper losses, those of the lenders will be all too real. However, even with less mortgage debt, homeowners will finally wake up to the fact that their home equity is gone. Without it, much like the Chinese today, Americans will consumer a whole lot less and hopefully save a whole lot more.

For a more in depth analysis of the tenuous position of the Americana economy and U.S. dollar denominated investments, read my new book “Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse.”

[hipmatt]

October 26, 2007

Send in the Clowns – Peter Schiff

Four leading members of the Bush administration’s economic team, including Ed Lazear, Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors, Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez, Al Hubbard, director of the National Economic Council, and Jim Nussle, director of the Office of Management and Budget, convened on a CNBC panel earlier this week and confidently forecast that the economy would avoid a recession. As they uttered their platitudes, we learned that housing sales plunged again, with national inventories of unsold homes hitting a new record high, and that Merrill Lynch disclosed nearly $8 billion in losses. Set against this backdrop of deteriorating economic news, it would have been more honest, and perhaps more effective, if the Administration team came on stage in clown makeup and oversize shoes.

The group’s most entertaining routine could be described as the “falling dollar hot potato”. It is a testament to the professionalism of CNBC host Dylan Ratigan that he was able to suppress howls of laughter while the economists scrambled to avoid any discussion of the dollar by claiming that only the President and the Secretary of the Treasury were allowed to comment. (Of course the only thing Bush or Paulson will utter on the subject is the all too familiar mantra “a strong dollar is in our national interest.”) How can the leading economic policy makers in government refuse to discuss the value of our money, which is arguably the single most important part of the economy? Why is the subject taboo? Perhaps they feel that anything they say will only inspire less confidence in the dollar? In reality, the Administration is perusing a policy of benign neglect. Today’s break-outs in the prices of gold and silver show that the policy is not going over too well!

In addition to the dollar dance, the wacky economists also provided some laughs on a variety of other subjects.

Regarding the California wildfires, the panel reassured us that the resilient U.S. economy would weather the storm, much as it did with hurricane Katrina. However, as state and federal officials promise unlimited funds to rebuild thousands of burned homes, they conveniently ignore the fact that we must put the tab on our national charge card. The ability to postpone pain by borrowing from abroad is not evidence of economic resilience but vulnerability. A truly resilient economy has ample domestic savings to cover these vicissitudes itself. America has yet to pay the costs associated with a string of natural disasters, the bills for which will likely come due much sooner than anyone seems to realize.

The Administration gang also told us that the American economy will benefit once China moves to an economy based on consumption rather than savings (in other words, more like our economy) as they will finally begin buying more of our products. Although it is true to expect that the Chinese will inevitably start spending more, it is ridiculous to assume that it will benefit the United States. When the Chinese begin spending they will simply snap up their own abundant production and send fewer goods to America. As the Chinese reduce their savings to begin enjoying the fruits of their labor, American borrowers will lose access to their largest source of credit. The two-pronged effect on the American economy will be substantial increases in both consumer prices and interest rates — hardly the benign outcome all the President’s men expect.

None seemed too concerned about the cost of funding the war in Iraq (already more costly than either Korea or Vietnam in inflation adjusted terms), which on the day of this “summit” we learned is now projected to be almost two trillion dollars. Their lack of concern likely reflects their belief that Americans are not the ones picking up the tab. I’m sure there is a different reaction among our foreign creditors, as they contemplate the prospects of “loaning” us that much more money knowing that a declining dollar guarantees they will never be re-paid in full. Perhaps the thought of loaning us endless sums to cope with natural disaster at home and man-made ones abroad will shock foreigners to their collective senses, prompting them to finally cut us off.

On housing we were once again told the problems would be contained. Such upbeat pronouncements should be wearing thin in the face of mounting evidence to the contrary. When will people begin to grasp that the trillions of dollars of mortgage loans financed by Wall Street will never be repaid in full and that the losses for lenders will be staggering?

Homeowners have lenders over a barrel, and soon all will know it. Once the government exempts forgiven mortgage debt from being treated as taxable income, defaults will become a national trend. Under normal circumstances, lenders have all the power, as 20% down payments and an ample supply of qualified buyers makes foreclosure a real threat. However, under current circumstances, it’s completely empty. Lenders can not foreclose as there are no buyers and no equity. If homeowners choose not to pay, lenders really have no choice but to renegotiate the loans. Once homeowners understand this no one will make a mortgage payment until their loan is reduced to an amount more consistent with the actual value of their home.

While homeowners themselves will experience mere paper losses, those of the lenders will be all too real. However, even with less mortgage debt, homeowners will finally wake up to the fact that their home equity is gone. Without it, much like the Chinese today, Americans will consumer a whole lot less and hopefully save a whole lot more.

For a more in depth analysis of the tenuous position of the Americana economy and U.S. dollar denominated investments, read my new book “Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse.”

[hipmatt]

I got the following email from Schiff recently..

Dear Investor,

Today Merrill Lynch announced a massive 8 billion dollar loss, and S&P downgraded their debt. This is just the beginning, as trillions of dollars that Wall Street loaned to American homeowners will never be repaid.

Watch this video clip from Fox News “Cavuto on Business” that originally aired Aug 17, 2007. The exchange is amazing in view of what has just happened. See how I tried to explain to a panel of delusional “experts” why earnings in the financial sector were about to turn into losses. Ben Stein even recommended Merrill Lynch as his favorite stock and lost his cool as I tried to enlighten him and Fox viewers regarding what was about to happen. You just have to see the exchange for yourself to believe it!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XtQoZAqjc8

On a similar line, this video (originally aired on Dec 29, 2006) of a similar exchange I had on Fox “Bulls & Bears” regarding the impending collapse in the housing/mortgage market must also be seen to be believed.

It is important that the public understand just how bad the advice main stream “experts” are peddling. Please forward this email, or the YouTube links to as many people in your contact list as possible and ask them to forward the email to their contacts as well, and so on.

Let’s get the word out and hold these clowns accountable for their lousy forecasts.

Sincerely,

Peter Schiff
President and Chief Global Strategist
Euro Pacific Capital

[hipmatt]

I got the following email from Schiff recently..

Dear Investor,

Today Merrill Lynch announced a massive 8 billion dollar loss, and S&P downgraded their debt. This is just the beginning, as trillions of dollars that Wall Street loaned to American homeowners will never be repaid.

Watch this video clip from Fox News “Cavuto on Business” that originally aired Aug 17, 2007. The exchange is amazing in view of what has just happened. See how I tried to explain to a panel of delusional “experts” why earnings in the financial sector were about to turn into losses. Ben Stein even recommended Merrill Lynch as his favorite stock and lost his cool as I tried to enlighten him and Fox viewers regarding what was about to happen. You just have to see the exchange for yourself to believe it!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XtQoZAqjc8

On a similar line, this video (originally aired on Dec 29, 2006) of a similar exchange I had on Fox “Bulls & Bears” regarding the impending collapse in the housing/mortgage market must also be seen to be believed.

It is important that the public understand just how bad the advice main stream “experts” are peddling. Please forward this email, or the YouTube links to as many people in your contact list as possible and ask them to forward the email to their contacts as well, and so on.

Let’s get the word out and hold these clowns accountable for their lousy forecasts.

Sincerely,

Peter Schiff
President and Chief Global Strategist
Euro Pacific Capital

[hipmatt]

I got the following email from Schiff recently..

Dear Investor,

Today Merrill Lynch announced a massive 8 billion dollar loss, and S&P downgraded their debt. This is just the beginning, as trillions of dollars that Wall Street loaned to American homeowners will never be repaid.

Watch this video clip from Fox News “Cavuto on Business” that originally aired Aug 17, 2007. The exchange is amazing in view of what has just happened. See how I tried to explain to a panel of delusional “experts” why earnings in the financial sector were about to turn into losses. Ben Stein even recommended Merrill Lynch as his favorite stock and lost his cool as I tried to enlighten him and Fox viewers regarding what was about to happen. You just have to see the exchange for yourself to believe it!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XtQoZAqjc8

On a similar line, this video (originally aired on Dec 29, 2006) of a similar exchange I had on Fox “Bulls & Bears” regarding the impending collapse in the housing/mortgage market must also be seen to be believed.

It is important that the public understand just how bad the advice main stream “experts” are peddling. Please forward this email, or the YouTube links to as many people in your contact list as possible and ask them to forward the email to their contacts as well, and so on.

Let’s get the word out and hold these clowns accountable for their lousy forecasts.

Sincerely,

Peter Schiff
President and Chief Global Strategist
Euro Pacific Capital

[Anonymous]

When the Federal Reserve is saying they need to print 75 billion dollars per month to support the economy, I am concerned. In 1862, and 1863 when the U.S. Congress first authorized greenbacks and decreed them legal tender it was supposedly necessary to supply the government with badly needed money or resources to support the civil war. See the Supreme Court Cases:

Hepburn v. Griswold
Knox v. Lee
Julliard v. Greenman

Is there really any difference today? Is the Federal Reserve not just supplying the government with the money it needs to survive? As all this money is printed, is Mr. Schiff not right, will the Chinese not drop the currency peg and let their currency rise? Obviously when that is done there will be price inflation in the United States as it will cost more to buy Chinese goods.

[Anonymous]

When the Federal Reserve is saying they need to print 75 billion dollars per month to support the economy, I am concerned. In 1862, and 1863 when the U.S. Congress first authorized greenbacks and decreed them legal tender it was supposedly necessary to supply the government with badly needed money or resources to support the civil war. See the Supreme Court Cases:

Hepburn v. Griswold
Knox v. Lee
Julliard v. Greenman

Is there really any difference today? Is the Federal Reserve not just supplying the government with the money it needs to survive? As all this money is printed, is Mr. Schiff not right, will the Chinese not drop the currency peg and let their currency rise? Obviously when that is done there will be price inflation in the United States as it will cost more to buy Chinese goods.

[Anonymous]

When the Federal Reserve is saying they need to print 75 billion dollars per month to support the economy, I am concerned. In 1862, and 1863 when the U.S. Congress first authorized greenbacks and decreed them legal tender it was supposedly necessary to supply the government with badly needed money or resources to support the civil war. See the Supreme Court Cases:

Hepburn v. Griswold
Knox v. Lee
Julliard v. Greenman

Is there really any difference today? Is the Federal Reserve not just supplying the government with the money it needs to survive? As all this money is printed, is Mr. Schiff not right, will the Chinese not drop the currency peg and let their currency rise? Obviously when that is done there will be price inflation in the United States as it will cost more to buy Chinese goods.

[Anonymous]

When the Federal Reserve is saying they need to print 75 billion dollars per month to support the economy, I am concerned. In 1862, and 1863 when the U.S. Congress first authorized greenbacks and decreed them legal tender it was supposedly necessary to supply the government with badly needed money or resources to support the civil war. See the Supreme Court Cases:

Hepburn v. Griswold
Knox v. Lee
Julliard v. Greenman

Is there really any difference today? Is the Federal Reserve not just supplying the government with the money it needs to survive? As all this money is printed, is Mr. Schiff not right, will the Chinese not drop the currency peg and let their currency rise? Obviously when that is done there will be price inflation in the United States as it will cost more to buy Chinese goods.

[Anonymous]

When the Federal Reserve is saying they need to print 75 billion dollars per month to support the economy, I am concerned. In 1862, and 1863 when the U.S. Congress first authorized greenbacks and decreed them legal tender it was supposedly necessary to supply the government with badly needed money or resources to support the civil war. See the Supreme Court Cases:

Hepburn v. Griswold
Knox v. Lee
Julliard v. Greenman

Is there really any difference today? Is the Federal Reserve not just supplying the government with the money it needs to survive? As all this money is printed, is Mr. Schiff not right, will the Chinese not drop the currency peg and let their currency rise? Obviously when that is done there will be price inflation in the United States as it will cost more to buy Chinese goods.

[Author]

Posts