- This topic has 200 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 10, 2009 at 4:15 PM #414009June 10, 2009 at 4:29 PM #413325
an
Participant[quote=flu][quote=XBoxBoy]I can’t shake the feeling that the real reason the proponents want this is so that wealthier areas don’t have to take kids from poor areas. (La Jolla HS for instance has a lot of kids that get bused in from other less wealthy areas.) I can’t prove that that this is a hidden agenda mind you, just a hunch. Of course whether or not there’s a hidden agenda doesn’t make the idea a good or bad idea either.
XBoxBoy[/quote]
I would agree with you on that one…[/quote]
I would agree with this as well. But it’s really nothing new. RB east/west and PQ are in Poway school district but they’re technically part of SD city. Same with Carmel Valley.June 10, 2009 at 4:29 PM #413557Participant[quote=flu][quote=XBoxBoy]I can’t shake the feeling that the real reason the proponents want this is so that wealthier areas don’t have to take kids from poor areas. (La Jolla HS for instance has a lot of kids that get bused in from other less wealthy areas.) I can’t prove that that this is a hidden agenda mind you, just a hunch. Of course whether or not there’s a hidden agenda doesn’t make the idea a good or bad idea either.
XBoxBoy[/quote]
I would agree with you on that one…[/quote]
I would agree with this as well. But it’s really nothing new. RB east/west and PQ are in Poway school district but they’re technically part of SD city. Same with Carmel Valley.June 10, 2009 at 4:29 PM #413808Participant[quote=flu][quote=XBoxBoy]I can’t shake the feeling that the real reason the proponents want this is so that wealthier areas don’t have to take kids from poor areas. (La Jolla HS for instance has a lot of kids that get bused in from other less wealthy areas.) I can’t prove that that this is a hidden agenda mind you, just a hunch. Of course whether or not there’s a hidden agenda doesn’t make the idea a good or bad idea either.
XBoxBoy[/quote]
I would agree with you on that one…[/quote]
I would agree with this as well. But it’s really nothing new. RB east/west and PQ are in Poway school district but they’re technically part of SD city. Same with Carmel Valley.June 10, 2009 at 4:29 PM #413878Participant[quote=flu][quote=XBoxBoy]I can’t shake the feeling that the real reason the proponents want this is so that wealthier areas don’t have to take kids from poor areas. (La Jolla HS for instance has a lot of kids that get bused in from other less wealthy areas.) I can’t prove that that this is a hidden agenda mind you, just a hunch. Of course whether or not there’s a hidden agenda doesn’t make the idea a good or bad idea either.
XBoxBoy[/quote]
I would agree with you on that one…[/quote]
I would agree with this as well. But it’s really nothing new. RB east/west and PQ are in Poway school district but they’re technically part of SD city. Same with Carmel Valley.June 10, 2009 at 4:29 PM #414028Participant[quote=flu][quote=XBoxBoy]I can’t shake the feeling that the real reason the proponents want this is so that wealthier areas don’t have to take kids from poor areas. (La Jolla HS for instance has a lot of kids that get bused in from other less wealthy areas.) I can’t prove that that this is a hidden agenda mind you, just a hunch. Of course whether or not there’s a hidden agenda doesn’t make the idea a good or bad idea either.
XBoxBoy[/quote]
I would agree with you on that one…[/quote]
I would agree with this as well. But it’s really nothing new. RB east/west and PQ are in Poway school district but they’re technically part of SD city. Same with Carmel Valley.June 10, 2009 at 4:33 PM #413330UCGal
Participant[quote=David J]Not sure if it is a good idea or not, but it is a bit suspicious that Scripps Ranch would be welcome to be part of the San Diego Coastal Unified School District. I guess it would depend on where I lived if I would be for it or against it.[/quote]
That jumped out at me, too.
And I think the point about breaking up the district so that LJHS doesn’t get as many NCLB kids is valid. Top rated schools are obviously choices for kids who’s schools flunk No-Child-Left-Behind. And I’m pretty sure that kids from failed schools jump to the front of the “choice” list.
June 10, 2009 at 4:33 PM #413562Participant[quote=David J]Not sure if it is a good idea or not, but it is a bit suspicious that Scripps Ranch would be welcome to be part of the San Diego Coastal Unified School District. I guess it would depend on where I lived if I would be for it or against it.[/quote]
That jumped out at me, too.
And I think the point about breaking up the district so that LJHS doesn’t get as many NCLB kids is valid. Top rated schools are obviously choices for kids who’s schools flunk No-Child-Left-Behind. And I’m pretty sure that kids from failed schools jump to the front of the “choice” list.
June 10, 2009 at 4:33 PM #413813Participant[quote=David J]Not sure if it is a good idea or not, but it is a bit suspicious that Scripps Ranch would be welcome to be part of the San Diego Coastal Unified School District. I guess it would depend on where I lived if I would be for it or against it.[/quote]
That jumped out at me, too.
And I think the point about breaking up the district so that LJHS doesn’t get as many NCLB kids is valid. Top rated schools are obviously choices for kids who’s schools flunk No-Child-Left-Behind. And I’m pretty sure that kids from failed schools jump to the front of the “choice” list.
June 10, 2009 at 4:33 PM #413882Participant[quote=David J]Not sure if it is a good idea or not, but it is a bit suspicious that Scripps Ranch would be welcome to be part of the San Diego Coastal Unified School District. I guess it would depend on where I lived if I would be for it or against it.[/quote]
That jumped out at me, too.
And I think the point about breaking up the district so that LJHS doesn’t get as many NCLB kids is valid. Top rated schools are obviously choices for kids who’s schools flunk No-Child-Left-Behind. And I’m pretty sure that kids from failed schools jump to the front of the “choice” list.
June 10, 2009 at 4:33 PM #414033Participant[quote=David J]Not sure if it is a good idea or not, but it is a bit suspicious that Scripps Ranch would be welcome to be part of the San Diego Coastal Unified School District. I guess it would depend on where I lived if I would be for it or against it.[/quote]
That jumped out at me, too.
And I think the point about breaking up the district so that LJHS doesn’t get as many NCLB kids is valid. Top rated schools are obviously choices for kids who’s schools flunk No-Child-Left-Behind. And I’m pretty sure that kids from failed schools jump to the front of the “choice” list.
June 10, 2009 at 4:51 PM #413335CoronitaParticipant[quote=AN][quote=flu][quote=XBoxBoy]I can’t shake the feeling that the real reason the proponents want this is so that wealthier areas don’t have to take kids from poor areas. (La Jolla HS for instance has a lot of kids that get bused in from other less wealthy areas.) I can’t prove that that this is a hidden agenda mind you, just a hunch. Of course whether or not there’s a hidden agenda doesn’t make the idea a good or bad idea either.
XBoxBoy[/quote]
I would agree with you on that one…[/quote]
I would agree with this as well. But it’s really nothing new. RB east/west and PQ are in Poway school district but they’re technically part of SD city. Same with Carmel Valley.[/quote]Would MM suddenly be coastal? 🙂
June 10, 2009 at 4:51 PM #413567CoronitaParticipant[quote=AN][quote=flu][quote=XBoxBoy]I can’t shake the feeling that the real reason the proponents want this is so that wealthier areas don’t have to take kids from poor areas. (La Jolla HS for instance has a lot of kids that get bused in from other less wealthy areas.) I can’t prove that that this is a hidden agenda mind you, just a hunch. Of course whether or not there’s a hidden agenda doesn’t make the idea a good or bad idea either.
XBoxBoy[/quote]
I would agree with you on that one…[/quote]
I would agree with this as well. But it’s really nothing new. RB east/west and PQ are in Poway school district but they’re technically part of SD city. Same with Carmel Valley.[/quote]Would MM suddenly be coastal? 🙂
June 10, 2009 at 4:51 PM #413818CoronitaParticipant[quote=AN][quote=flu][quote=XBoxBoy]I can’t shake the feeling that the real reason the proponents want this is so that wealthier areas don’t have to take kids from poor areas. (La Jolla HS for instance has a lot of kids that get bused in from other less wealthy areas.) I can’t prove that that this is a hidden agenda mind you, just a hunch. Of course whether or not there’s a hidden agenda doesn’t make the idea a good or bad idea either.
XBoxBoy[/quote]
I would agree with you on that one…[/quote]
I would agree with this as well. But it’s really nothing new. RB east/west and PQ are in Poway school district but they’re technically part of SD city. Same with Carmel Valley.[/quote]Would MM suddenly be coastal? 🙂
June 10, 2009 at 4:51 PM #413887CoronitaParticipant[quote=AN][quote=flu][quote=XBoxBoy]I can’t shake the feeling that the real reason the proponents want this is so that wealthier areas don’t have to take kids from poor areas. (La Jolla HS for instance has a lot of kids that get bused in from other less wealthy areas.) I can’t prove that that this is a hidden agenda mind you, just a hunch. Of course whether or not there’s a hidden agenda doesn’t make the idea a good or bad idea either.
XBoxBoy[/quote]
I would agree with you on that one…[/quote]
I would agree with this as well. But it’s really nothing new. RB east/west and PQ are in Poway school district but they’re technically part of SD city. Same with Carmel Valley.[/quote]Would MM suddenly be coastal? 🙂
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.