- This topic has 50 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 7 months ago by
drunkle.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 10, 2007 at 9:18 AM #65020July 10, 2007 at 9:18 AM #64959
no_such_reality
ParticipantL.A. County alone will top 13 million by 2050, an increase of almost 3.5
Of course, by 2050, the kids that graduated college this spring will be retiring. If they work a government job like Fireman, Police, etc, they will be retired for 15 year by the time this happens…
This kind of article comes out every year. It’s primary purpose is to plan and potential prop up the need for big government.
That said, the important thing to remember is 43 years is a long time. After WW2, the great suburban shift occured. Maybe after the oil wars of twenty-teens, the great Urban Arcology migration will begin or something equally different from today.
July 10, 2007 at 9:38 AM #65022Borat
ParticipantSan Diego will be more fun if it’s more Miami like.
It ain’t gonna be more Miami-like — it’s gonna be more TJ-like. So unless you like rocking out to Los Tigres del Norte, you may not dig it.
July 10, 2007 at 9:38 AM #64961Borat
ParticipantSan Diego will be more fun if it’s more Miami like.
It ain’t gonna be more Miami-like — it’s gonna be more TJ-like. So unless you like rocking out to Los Tigres del Norte, you may not dig it.
July 10, 2007 at 9:49 AM #64963jimmyle
ParticipantIf we don’t like TJ like San Diego then we can always move to Montana. Montana is mostly White and Traffic is very light.
July 10, 2007 at 9:49 AM #65024jimmyle
ParticipantIf we don’t like TJ like San Diego then we can always move to Montana. Montana is mostly White and Traffic is very light.
July 10, 2007 at 9:56 AM #64968Alex_angel
Participantwhy does anyone need to move and why do we need to learn spanish? this state is too rich for the feds to ever let go of. Bush had it right with the triple layer fence.
July 10, 2007 at 9:56 AM #65028Alex_angel
Participantwhy does anyone need to move and why do we need to learn spanish? this state is too rich for the feds to ever let go of. Bush had it right with the triple layer fence.
July 10, 2007 at 9:58 AM #64969Bugs
ParticipantOkay, the 4 wives comment was stupid and out of line and I apologize for that. My prevailing sentiment remains – I’d rather learn the new official language than have to live in a theocracy.
July 10, 2007 at 9:58 AM #65030Bugs
ParticipantOkay, the 4 wives comment was stupid and out of line and I apologize for that. My prevailing sentiment remains – I’d rather learn the new official language than have to live in a theocracy.
July 10, 2007 at 9:59 AM #64972JWM in SD
ParticipantAgreed, this article is HIGHLY SUSPECT in terms of timing. Unfortunately, I will guarantee you that this article will be used by unscrupulous Realtors to scare sheeple buyers into becoming debt slaves.
July 10, 2007 at 9:59 AM #65032JWM in SD
ParticipantAgreed, this article is HIGHLY SUSPECT in terms of timing. Unfortunately, I will guarantee you that this article will be used by unscrupulous Realtors to scare sheeple buyers into becoming debt slaves.
July 10, 2007 at 10:02 AM #64973jennyo
ParticipantThe timing of the article is consistent with the timing of the Department of Finance population information. It has nothing to do with what is/isn’t happening in the housing market. Every year at this time, this information is released by the state. It coincides with the end of the state fiscal year.
July 10, 2007 at 10:02 AM #65034jennyo
ParticipantThe timing of the article is consistent with the timing of the Department of Finance population information. It has nothing to do with what is/isn’t happening in the housing market. Every year at this time, this information is released by the state. It coincides with the end of the state fiscal year.
July 10, 2007 at 10:06 AM #64978drunkle
Participantit projects a 1% growth rate… hardly anything to be up in arms about.
by then, all the jobs will be outsourced to mexico anyway. californians will be border jumping to work in the maquiladoras.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.