Ron Paul Wins Alaska and Washington State + Several State GOP Chairman Positions

[admin]

http://youtu.be/UQMtlah4Iec

Rachel Maddow explains the real news.

Ron Paul has now won:

Louisiana
Washington
Minnesota
Iowa
Alaska

Will likely win:

Nevada
Maine

and several others

[ocrenter]

This is so hilariously undemocratic. Essentially invalidating the votes of millions of primary voters’ right.

But who cares, the whole process is so rigged with the millionaire dominated SuperPACs that I actually find myself cheering for this little underhanded strategy.

[markmax33]

[quote=ocrenter]This is so hilariously undemocratic. Essentially invalidating the votes of millions of primary voters’ right.

But who cares, the whole process is so rigged with the millionaire dominated SuperPACs that I actually find myself cheering for this little underhanded strategy.[/quote]

I’m pretty sure this shows the voter apathy. Caucuses have been in place in these states for years and the people know their votes are straw votes. They could show up for a few extra hours if it was important to them. They voted to put this democratic system in place.

An eductated voter would trade his time in for “voting” in the straw poll and go vote in their local caucus.

An educated Politician wouldn’t even focus on attack adds for a straw vote, he would simply ensure his delegates were in place and he had organization on the ground. Keep in mind Ron Paul nor his campaign did any of this. It was completely the doing of the local people communicating on blogs and organizing. http://www.Dailypaul.com has surpassed the Redstate, the number 1 conservative blog on the internet in terms of page views and usage.

[Anonymous]

[quote=markmax33]www.Dailypaul.com has surpassed the Redstate, the number 1 conservative blog on the internet in terms of page views and usage.[/quote]

Yes, and many porn sites see more internet traffic than the Ron Paul sites.

So using your logic, Jenna Jameson will be the next Republican nominee.

[markmax33]

[quote=pri_dk][quote=markmax33]www.Dailypaul.com has surpassed the Redstate, the number 1 conservative blog on the internet in terms of page views and usage.[/quote]

Yes, and many porn sites see more internet traffic than the Ron Paul sites.

So using your logic, Jenna Jameson will be the next Republican nominee.[/quote]

The hating is getting old. The logic is breaking down. You are getting more and more desperate trying to discredit any accomplishments Ron Paul may have. You aren’t even on topic with your response to my comment.

I made the comment about http://www.dailypaul.com to show how the Ron Paul people are organizing and how it is a public showing and not secret and implied nothing else. The #1 conservative blog in the country – Redstate actually Bans anyone saying anything positive about Ron Paul and they have been surpassed by the grassroots efforts.

[sdrealtor]

At this pace Wyoming and Montana have got to be there for the taking too. Go RP!

[Anonymous]

Perhaps the Ron Paul sites get a lot of traffic because supporters make frequent posts about minor details in an effort to tout “accomplishments.”

Now why would I think that?

[Anonymous]

[quote=sdrealtor]At this pace Wyoming and Montana have got to be there for the taking too. Go RP![/quote]

I’m eager to to see the separate thread for each state when it does happen.

But what I really want to see is the “Ron Paul wins a state that actually has carries any weight” thread.

[ocrenter]

[quote=markmax33]
I’m pretty sure this shows the voter apathy. Caucuses have been in place in these states for years and the people know their votes are straw votes. They could show up for a few extra hours if it was important to them. They voted to put this democratic system in place.

An eductated voter would trade his time in for “voting” in the straw poll and go vote in their local caucus.
[/quote]

By labeling the average primary voter as “apathetic” and “ignorant” of the “real process”, this is just your way of justifying what is really a very undemocratic underhanded way of getting an extreme viewpoint of a fringe minority onto the stage of a major political party.

[ocrenter]

[quote=pri_dk]
But what I really want to see is the “Ron Paul wins a state that actually has carries any weight” thread.[/quote]

EXACTLY!!!

[poorgradstudent]

The Padres now have a .320 win percentage, and thus are still doing better than Ron Paul.

[bearishgurl]

Not surprisingly, it sounds like a lot of “voter apathy” going on here. Who are the “most vocal” Piggs here voting for in the primary . . . that is, if you’re even registered (or registered for the “right” party)?? :=[

Deadline to register for the primary is May 21 and you can now fill out the form online and mail it in, forthwith.

https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/register-to-vote/

Aren’t happy with the current PTB’s?? Get to it, Piggs!

[markmax33]

[quote=ocrenter][quote=markmax33]
I’m pretty sure this shows the voter apathy. Caucuses have been in place in these states for years and the people know their votes are straw votes. They could show up for a few extra hours if it was important to them. They voted to put this democratic system in place.

An eductated voter would trade his time in for “voting” in the straw poll and go vote in their local caucus.
[/quote]

By labeling the average primary voter as “apathetic” and “ignorant” of the “real process”, this is just your way of justifying what is really a very undemocratic underhanded way of getting an extreme viewpoint of a fringe minority onto the stage of a major political party.[/quote]

How is this true? These states have been Caucuses for years! Do you know if they teach the kids in those states about the delegate process? Do you know if they talk about it in the newspaper?

I didn’t label the voters at all. The Caucus voters in those states refused to show up and vote for Romney even though they are educated and know how the Caucus works in their state. Can you read their minds as to why they didn’t show up? I know 44% of Republicans surveyed in exit polls weren’t happy with him as the nominee, that’s where I drew my conclusion from. Ron Paul let it be known very early this was his plan. It wasn’t a secret.

Don’t complain about a Caucus process established in another state, move there and vote to change it if it is important instead of compalining about it. I wouldn’t expect Californians to know anyway.

…and since when is following the Constitution fringe? You can’t even name a fringe idea that he presents. It’s kind of just slander in cyberspace. Fringe is what Obama and the Republicans present:

1. Fringe is spending 100% more tax money than we make every year. We’ll be around $2T in deficit this year.

2. Fringe is repealing the constitution without an ammendment and locking up Americans in overseas jails without a trial.

3. Fringe is monitoring everything on the internet and arresting people based on that information without a search warrant.

4. Fringe is allowing the money supply to be controlled by 12 men in a locked room with no accountability.

5. Fringe is being pulled over by the TSA while you drive on a road and being searched with no warrant.

etc, etc.

[bearishgurl]

[quote=markmax33]…and since when is following the Constitution fringe? You can’t even name a fringe idea that he presents. It’s kind of just slander in cyberspace. Fringe is what Obama and the Republicans present:

1. Fringe is spending 100% more tax money than we make every year. We’ll be around $2T in deficit this year.

2. Fringe is repealing the constitution without an ammendment and locking up Americans in overseas jails without a trial.

3. Fringe is monitoring everything on the internet and arresting people based on that information without a search warrant.

4. Fringe is allowing the money supply to be controlled by 12 men in a locked room with no accountability.

5. Fringe is being pulled over by the TSA while you drive on a road and being searched with no warrant.

etc, etc.[/quote]

Thank you for laying this all out here for the Piggs to munch on, MM3!

[mike92104]

[quote=markmax33]

…and since when is following the Constitution fringe? You can’t even name a fringe idea that he presents. It’s kind of just slander in cyberspace. Fringe is what Obama and the Republicans present:

1. Fringe is spending 100% more tax money than we make every year. We’ll be around $2T in deficit this year.

2. Fringe is repealing the constitution without an ammendment and locking up Americans in overseas jails without a trial.

3. Fringe is monitoring everything on the internet and arresting people based on that information without a search warrant.

4. Fringe is allowing the money supply to be controlled by 12 men in a locked room with no accountability.

5. Fringe is being pulled over by the TSA while you drive on a road and being searched with no warrant.

etc, etc.[/quote]

Excellent points.

[Author]

Posts