- This topic has 15 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
recordsclerk.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
March 21, 2008 at 9:16 PM #12203
-
March 21, 2008 at 9:24 PM #174541
Bugs
ParticipantYou know, after all this time I still struggle with the concept of a tract home that costs 12x the median household income for the County.
-
March 21, 2008 at 10:05 PM #174546
kewp
ParticipantYou’ll have a better grasp when you realize the easiest way to make money is San Diego over the last decade was to buy a house with a toxic loan.
-
March 21, 2008 at 10:05 PM #174891
kewp
ParticipantYou’ll have a better grasp when you realize the easiest way to make money is San Diego over the last decade was to buy a house with a toxic loan.
-
March 21, 2008 at 10:05 PM #174898
kewp
ParticipantYou’ll have a better grasp when you realize the easiest way to make money is San Diego over the last decade was to buy a house with a toxic loan.
-
March 21, 2008 at 10:05 PM #174909
kewp
ParticipantYou’ll have a better grasp when you realize the easiest way to make money is San Diego over the last decade was to buy a house with a toxic loan.
-
March 21, 2008 at 10:05 PM #174995
kewp
ParticipantYou’ll have a better grasp when you realize the easiest way to make money is San Diego over the last decade was to buy a house with a toxic loan.
-
-
March 21, 2008 at 9:24 PM #174889
Bugs
ParticipantYou know, after all this time I still struggle with the concept of a tract home that costs 12x the median household income for the County.
-
March 21, 2008 at 9:24 PM #174892
Bugs
ParticipantYou know, after all this time I still struggle with the concept of a tract home that costs 12x the median household income for the County.
-
March 21, 2008 at 9:24 PM #174901
Bugs
ParticipantYou know, after all this time I still struggle with the concept of a tract home that costs 12x the median household income for the County.
-
March 21, 2008 at 9:24 PM #174990
Bugs
ParticipantYou know, after all this time I still struggle with the concept of a tract home that costs 12x the median household income for the County.
-
March 21, 2008 at 10:25 PM #174556
recordsclerk
Participant“It seems like you can get 4000+ sq ft for $800K”
This is true, but just started selling in the 800’s in the last few months. There are 2 properties that just closed in the 700’s. The one on Hawthorne (was listed for 835K)is 4300sqft and sold for 700K and another one on Blue Ridge (I think that’s the name of the street and was listed for 799K) 4070sqft sold for 720K. Both properties were not trashed and in good condition (I viewed both homes personally). Chula Vista has always been cheaper then Carmel Valley, but the gap is widening. -
March 21, 2008 at 10:25 PM #174903
recordsclerk
Participant“It seems like you can get 4000+ sq ft for $800K”
This is true, but just started selling in the 800’s in the last few months. There are 2 properties that just closed in the 700’s. The one on Hawthorne (was listed for 835K)is 4300sqft and sold for 700K and another one on Blue Ridge (I think that’s the name of the street and was listed for 799K) 4070sqft sold for 720K. Both properties were not trashed and in good condition (I viewed both homes personally). Chula Vista has always been cheaper then Carmel Valley, but the gap is widening. -
March 21, 2008 at 10:25 PM #174908
recordsclerk
Participant“It seems like you can get 4000+ sq ft for $800K”
This is true, but just started selling in the 800’s in the last few months. There are 2 properties that just closed in the 700’s. The one on Hawthorne (was listed for 835K)is 4300sqft and sold for 700K and another one on Blue Ridge (I think that’s the name of the street and was listed for 799K) 4070sqft sold for 720K. Both properties were not trashed and in good condition (I viewed both homes personally). Chula Vista has always been cheaper then Carmel Valley, but the gap is widening. -
March 21, 2008 at 10:25 PM #174918
recordsclerk
Participant“It seems like you can get 4000+ sq ft for $800K”
This is true, but just started selling in the 800’s in the last few months. There are 2 properties that just closed in the 700’s. The one on Hawthorne (was listed for 835K)is 4300sqft and sold for 700K and another one on Blue Ridge (I think that’s the name of the street and was listed for 799K) 4070sqft sold for 720K. Both properties were not trashed and in good condition (I viewed both homes personally). Chula Vista has always been cheaper then Carmel Valley, but the gap is widening. -
March 21, 2008 at 10:25 PM #175005
recordsclerk
Participant“It seems like you can get 4000+ sq ft for $800K”
This is true, but just started selling in the 800’s in the last few months. There are 2 properties that just closed in the 700’s. The one on Hawthorne (was listed for 835K)is 4300sqft and sold for 700K and another one on Blue Ridge (I think that’s the name of the street and was listed for 799K) 4070sqft sold for 720K. Both properties were not trashed and in good condition (I viewed both homes personally). Chula Vista has always been cheaper then Carmel Valley, but the gap is widening.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.