- This topic has 1,340 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 27, 2010 at 9:36 AM #545050April 27, 2010 at 9:46 AM #544095ArrayaParticipant
It’s part of the financialization of everything. homes are bought and sold like stocks. Debt is sold to foreign entities like slavery. In the corporate world contracts and laws are amoral. And they are broken on a consistent basis with no fanfare all on the basis of a cost benefit analysis. he entered into a contract with an amoral entity and it would be foolish to operate under a different set of rules than the entity that he is doing business with. It would put him at a disadvantage.
As well as living for “free”. Every default lives for free, Bills period just happens to be a little longer. his actions are perfectly rational given the situation. For him to act otherwise would be irresponsible and foolish.
Seems we don’t like it when humans act like corporate entities.
April 27, 2010 at 9:46 AM #544211ArrayaParticipantIt’s part of the financialization of everything. homes are bought and sold like stocks. Debt is sold to foreign entities like slavery. In the corporate world contracts and laws are amoral. And they are broken on a consistent basis with no fanfare all on the basis of a cost benefit analysis. he entered into a contract with an amoral entity and it would be foolish to operate under a different set of rules than the entity that he is doing business with. It would put him at a disadvantage.
As well as living for “free”. Every default lives for free, Bills period just happens to be a little longer. his actions are perfectly rational given the situation. For him to act otherwise would be irresponsible and foolish.
Seems we don’t like it when humans act like corporate entities.
April 27, 2010 at 9:46 AM #544686ArrayaParticipantIt’s part of the financialization of everything. homes are bought and sold like stocks. Debt is sold to foreign entities like slavery. In the corporate world contracts and laws are amoral. And they are broken on a consistent basis with no fanfare all on the basis of a cost benefit analysis. he entered into a contract with an amoral entity and it would be foolish to operate under a different set of rules than the entity that he is doing business with. It would put him at a disadvantage.
As well as living for “free”. Every default lives for free, Bills period just happens to be a little longer. his actions are perfectly rational given the situation. For him to act otherwise would be irresponsible and foolish.
Seems we don’t like it when humans act like corporate entities.
April 27, 2010 at 9:46 AM #544781ArrayaParticipantIt’s part of the financialization of everything. homes are bought and sold like stocks. Debt is sold to foreign entities like slavery. In the corporate world contracts and laws are amoral. And they are broken on a consistent basis with no fanfare all on the basis of a cost benefit analysis. he entered into a contract with an amoral entity and it would be foolish to operate under a different set of rules than the entity that he is doing business with. It would put him at a disadvantage.
As well as living for “free”. Every default lives for free, Bills period just happens to be a little longer. his actions are perfectly rational given the situation. For him to act otherwise would be irresponsible and foolish.
Seems we don’t like it when humans act like corporate entities.
April 27, 2010 at 9:46 AM #545055ArrayaParticipantIt’s part of the financialization of everything. homes are bought and sold like stocks. Debt is sold to foreign entities like slavery. In the corporate world contracts and laws are amoral. And they are broken on a consistent basis with no fanfare all on the basis of a cost benefit analysis. he entered into a contract with an amoral entity and it would be foolish to operate under a different set of rules than the entity that he is doing business with. It would put him at a disadvantage.
As well as living for “free”. Every default lives for free, Bills period just happens to be a little longer. his actions are perfectly rational given the situation. For him to act otherwise would be irresponsible and foolish.
Seems we don’t like it when humans act like corporate entities.
April 27, 2010 at 10:02 AM #544100NotCrankyParticipant[quote=briansd1]Russell thanks for the link.
I believe that the following excerpt is very true.
Libertarianism appears to be very popular these days, especially among Republicans who wish to pretend to be anti-big government and yet are ashamed of eight years of huge government deficit and interference in personal life under W.
http://rationallyspeaking.blogspot.com/2009/09/problems-with-libertarianism.html
[/quote]
What you quoted is one of those comments that just makes you say, “no shit”.April 27, 2010 at 10:02 AM #544216NotCrankyParticipant[quote=briansd1]Russell thanks for the link.
I believe that the following excerpt is very true.
Libertarianism appears to be very popular these days, especially among Republicans who wish to pretend to be anti-big government and yet are ashamed of eight years of huge government deficit and interference in personal life under W.
http://rationallyspeaking.blogspot.com/2009/09/problems-with-libertarianism.html
[/quote]
What you quoted is one of those comments that just makes you say, “no shit”.April 27, 2010 at 10:02 AM #544691NotCrankyParticipant[quote=briansd1]Russell thanks for the link.
I believe that the following excerpt is very true.
Libertarianism appears to be very popular these days, especially among Republicans who wish to pretend to be anti-big government and yet are ashamed of eight years of huge government deficit and interference in personal life under W.
http://rationallyspeaking.blogspot.com/2009/09/problems-with-libertarianism.html
[/quote]
What you quoted is one of those comments that just makes you say, “no shit”.April 27, 2010 at 10:02 AM #544786NotCrankyParticipant[quote=briansd1]Russell thanks for the link.
I believe that the following excerpt is very true.
Libertarianism appears to be very popular these days, especially among Republicans who wish to pretend to be anti-big government and yet are ashamed of eight years of huge government deficit and interference in personal life under W.
http://rationallyspeaking.blogspot.com/2009/09/problems-with-libertarianism.html
[/quote]
What you quoted is one of those comments that just makes you say, “no shit”.April 27, 2010 at 10:02 AM #545060NotCrankyParticipant[quote=briansd1]Russell thanks for the link.
I believe that the following excerpt is very true.
Libertarianism appears to be very popular these days, especially among Republicans who wish to pretend to be anti-big government and yet are ashamed of eight years of huge government deficit and interference in personal life under W.
http://rationallyspeaking.blogspot.com/2009/09/problems-with-libertarianism.html
[/quote]
What you quoted is one of those comments that just makes you say, “no shit”.April 27, 2010 at 10:04 AM #544105anParticipant[quote=briansd1]Russell thanks for the link.
I believe that the following excerpt is very true.
Libertarianism appears to be very popular these days, especially among Republicans who wish to pretend to be anti-big government and yet are ashamed of eight years of huge government deficit and interference in personal life under W.
http://rationallyspeaking.blogspot.com/2009/09/problems-with-libertarianism.html
[/quote]
I don’t get it, if they’re ashamed of Bush, doesn’t that mean they don’t support him and his big government policy? Is this author trying to say that once you registered with one party, you can’t change to a different party when the party you register for no longer do what they say they would do? BTW, here are 2 data points, my coworker and I were both life long democrats until 2008. We both are now registered Libertarians.April 27, 2010 at 10:04 AM #544221anParticipant[quote=briansd1]Russell thanks for the link.
I believe that the following excerpt is very true.
Libertarianism appears to be very popular these days, especially among Republicans who wish to pretend to be anti-big government and yet are ashamed of eight years of huge government deficit and interference in personal life under W.
http://rationallyspeaking.blogspot.com/2009/09/problems-with-libertarianism.html
[/quote]
I don’t get it, if they’re ashamed of Bush, doesn’t that mean they don’t support him and his big government policy? Is this author trying to say that once you registered with one party, you can’t change to a different party when the party you register for no longer do what they say they would do? BTW, here are 2 data points, my coworker and I were both life long democrats until 2008. We both are now registered Libertarians.April 27, 2010 at 10:04 AM #544696anParticipant[quote=briansd1]Russell thanks for the link.
I believe that the following excerpt is very true.
Libertarianism appears to be very popular these days, especially among Republicans who wish to pretend to be anti-big government and yet are ashamed of eight years of huge government deficit and interference in personal life under W.
http://rationallyspeaking.blogspot.com/2009/09/problems-with-libertarianism.html
[/quote]
I don’t get it, if they’re ashamed of Bush, doesn’t that mean they don’t support him and his big government policy? Is this author trying to say that once you registered with one party, you can’t change to a different party when the party you register for no longer do what they say they would do? BTW, here are 2 data points, my coworker and I were both life long democrats until 2008. We both are now registered Libertarians.April 27, 2010 at 10:04 AM #544792anParticipant[quote=briansd1]Russell thanks for the link.
I believe that the following excerpt is very true.
Libertarianism appears to be very popular these days, especially among Republicans who wish to pretend to be anti-big government and yet are ashamed of eight years of huge government deficit and interference in personal life under W.
http://rationallyspeaking.blogspot.com/2009/09/problems-with-libertarianism.html
[/quote]
I don’t get it, if they’re ashamed of Bush, doesn’t that mean they don’t support him and his big government policy? Is this author trying to say that once you registered with one party, you can’t change to a different party when the party you register for no longer do what they say they would do? BTW, here are 2 data points, my coworker and I were both life long democrats until 2008. We both are now registered Libertarians. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.