- This topic has 1,340 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by
Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 24, 2010 at 12:38 PM #544397April 24, 2010 at 1:51 PM #543483
Hobie
ParticipantMy grandfather and the majority of his generation would treat a man’s word as his bond. The older I get the more I understand and appreciate the Great generation.
April 24, 2010 at 1:51 PM #543598Hobie
ParticipantMy grandfather and the majority of his generation would treat a man’s word as his bond. The older I get the more I understand and appreciate the Great generation.
April 24, 2010 at 1:51 PM #544072Hobie
ParticipantMy grandfather and the majority of his generation would treat a man’s word as his bond. The older I get the more I understand and appreciate the Great generation.
April 24, 2010 at 1:51 PM #544166Hobie
ParticipantMy grandfather and the majority of his generation would treat a man’s word as his bond. The older I get the more I understand and appreciate the Great generation.
April 24, 2010 at 1:51 PM #544437Hobie
ParticipantMy grandfather and the majority of his generation would treat a man’s word as his bond. The older I get the more I understand and appreciate the Great generation.
April 24, 2010 at 2:25 PM #543498scaredyclassic
Participantpeople were slimeballs back then too. they were worse then. if the immorality fo a society could be measured, it was much larger back then.
April 24, 2010 at 2:25 PM #543613scaredyclassic
Participantpeople were slimeballs back then too. they were worse then. if the immorality fo a society could be measured, it was much larger back then.
April 24, 2010 at 2:25 PM #544087scaredyclassic
Participantpeople were slimeballs back then too. they were worse then. if the immorality fo a society could be measured, it was much larger back then.
April 24, 2010 at 2:25 PM #544181scaredyclassic
Participantpeople were slimeballs back then too. they were worse then. if the immorality fo a society could be measured, it was much larger back then.
April 24, 2010 at 2:25 PM #544452scaredyclassic
Participantpeople were slimeballs back then too. they were worse then. if the immorality fo a society could be measured, it was much larger back then.
April 24, 2010 at 4:01 PM #543508Fletch
Participant[quote=scaredycat]people were slimeballs back then too. they were worse then. if the immorality fo a society could be measured, it was much larger back then.[/quote]
They were better at the hard virtues. We are better at the soft ones.April 24, 2010 at 4:01 PM #543623Fletch
Participant[quote=scaredycat]people were slimeballs back then too. they were worse then. if the immorality fo a society could be measured, it was much larger back then.[/quote]
They were better at the hard virtues. We are better at the soft ones.April 24, 2010 at 4:01 PM #544097Fletch
Participant[quote=scaredycat]people were slimeballs back then too. they were worse then. if the immorality fo a society could be measured, it was much larger back then.[/quote]
They were better at the hard virtues. We are better at the soft ones.April 24, 2010 at 4:01 PM #544191Fletch
Participant[quote=scaredycat]people were slimeballs back then too. they were worse then. if the immorality fo a society could be measured, it was much larger back then.[/quote]
They were better at the hard virtues. We are better at the soft ones. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
