- This topic has 1,297 replies, 43 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 6 months ago by
Balboa.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 15, 2016 at 3:32 PM #802342October 15, 2016 at 3:38 PM #802346
ucodegen
Participant[quote=scaredyclassic][quote=ucodegen][quote=scaredyclassic]
was he recognizeably famous back then?[/quote]
I presume you mean in the 80’s (didn’t want quotes within quotes etc ad-nauseum) Yes.. and probably more ‘attractive’ too. The crazy hair is now hiding some balding.He was on Oprah in 1988: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEPs17_AkTI
In 1980: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-w47wgdhso%5B/quote%5D
79, 80 looks like he was pretty anonymous still. just getting started on putting his face everywhere…
Well are you talking ‘celebrity’ or ‘recognizably famous’. Warren Buffet is ‘recognizably famous’, but is not a ‘celebrity’ except maybe to a group of invest-heads. Same can be said for someone like Greenspan (maybe infamous for how he handled/created the 2000 market overheat)
October 15, 2016 at 3:42 PM #802347Participant[quote=FlyerInHi]The NY Post says the Trump campaign arranged interview. And NY post is Trump’s preferred news outlet owned by News Corp, owner of Fox
ucodegen, you sound like that “says who” lawyer.[/quote]
More like prove it and being very careful of how words are crafted and why. As for arranging – that is not the same as vetting. I think there are other shoes to fall here.[quote=FlyerInHi]Trump never denied flying commercial. It’s pretty astounding his apologists claim he’s was too rich to deign flying first class. Trump claims the women are too ugly to assault. But he never claimed he’s too good for commercial first class. Someone should ask him at the next debate.[/quote]
True. However, you may have wanted to pay attention to an earlier post w/respect to litigation.It would be a good question to get him to clarify.
October 15, 2016 at 3:47 PM #802348FlyerInHi
GuestThe defendant’s witness put the defendant squarely at the scene of the crime. Very hard to weasel out of this one.
October 15, 2016 at 3:48 PM #802349scaredyclassic
Participantit would be exciting to get laid in an airplane bathroom on a commercia jet.
it would be boring to have sex on yr. iwn plane.
October 15, 2016 at 3:52 PM #802345Participant[quote=scaredyclassic]bill cosby flew commercial. he was pretty rich.
he did standup on drugging women.
he met a chick onboard and later raped her. allegedly[/quote]
There is wealth and then there is stupidly wealthy.Trump was approx $1B in 1980, currently est $11Bil
Cosby is $400mil currently.NOTE: I did see other articles saying $3.7 Bil, but I get $11Bil from remembering a financial article on him. Yes, Trump exaggerate his wealth.
October 15, 2016 at 3:56 PM #802350bearishgurl
Participant[quote=ucodegen][quote=scaredyclassic]
was he recognizeably famous back then?[/quote]
I presume you mean in the 80’s (didn’t want quotes within quotes etc ad-nauseum) Yes.. and probably more ‘attractive’ too. The crazy hair is now hiding some balding.He was on Oprah in 1988: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEPs17_AkTI
In 1980: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-w47wgdhso%5B/quote%5DIn the 1980 video with Tom Brokaw, Trump’s speech (incl his pronunciations) and demeanor looks and sounds very much like his daughter, Ivanka. She’s a little older than 33 now but the resemblance between the way the two express themselves is eerie. He was and she is very polished, relaxed and composed.
October 15, 2016 at 4:00 PM #802352Participant[quote=FlyerInHi]The defendant’s witness put the defendant squarely at the scene of the crime. Very hard to weasel out of this one.[/quote]
Good try – but not in court, yet.October 15, 2016 at 4:08 PM #802353Participant[quote=bearishgurl]In the 1980 video with Tom Brokaw, Trump’s speech (incl his pronunciations) and demeanor looks and sounds very much like his daughter, Ivanka. She’s a little older than 33 now but the resemblance between the way the two express themselves is eerie. He was and she is very polished, relaxed and composed.[/quote]
I think it is to do with how one is raised. I’ve seen some other wealthy people’s kids do complete wipe-outs.
The behavior is similar with the son too. I do notice that Ivanka and Trump Jr. are more restrained at their current age than Donald was.
October 15, 2016 at 4:08 PM #802354Participant[quote=ucodegen][quote=bearishgurl]In the 1980 video with Tom Brokaw, Trump’s speech (incl his pronunciations) and demeanor looks and sounds very much like his daughter, Ivanka. She’s a little older than 33 now but the resemblance between the way the two express themselves is eerie. He was and she is very polished, relaxed and composed.[/quote]
I think it is to do with how one is raised. I’ve seen some other wealthy people’s kids to complete wipe-outs.
The behavior is similar with the son too. I do notice that Ivanka and Trump Jr. are more restrained at their current age than Donald was.[/quote]I loved Ivanka’s and Donald Jr’s speech at the RNC. I like Eric as well, but he sometimes talks too fast … as if he is thinking ahead of the speaker he is listening to.
October 15, 2016 at 4:14 PM #802351Participant[quote=scaredyclassic]it would be exciting to get laid in an airplane bathroom on a commercia jet.
it would be boring to have sex on yr. iwn plane.[/quote]
To me it is more about with who than where.How about in free-fall??
On the space station in zero gravity??I don’t know about bathroom on commercial jet vs own jet. I think I would go for own jet – provided that ‘we’ (no not you scardy) would be left alone in the passenger area — there are all sorts of interesting surfaces to get messy on Trump’s plane. Could even go for some hyperbolic flights.
Most commercial jet bathrooms are cramped, not always clean, sometimes smelly.
Thinking it over, I think I would like zero G best.
October 15, 2016 at 4:21 PM #802356Guest[quote=ucodegen]
More like prove it and being very careful of how words are crafted and why. As for arranging – that is not the same as vetting. I think there are other shoes to fall here.
[/quote]OMG, we have to be careful about language where Trump is concerned?
Putting forth an unreliable witness just shows how incompetent the Trump campaign is.
Trump can’t claim to have never met the women when his own witness says he was there in flesh and blood.Voters only need to look at the evidence. Trump is digging a hole for himself.
October 15, 2016 at 4:34 PM #802355
svelteParticipant[quote=ucodegen]
The correct statement is:Donald Trump’s campaign says a British man is countering claims that the GOP presidential nominee groped a woman on a cross-country flight more than three decades ago.
Which is a stretch from “Trump camp puts forward..” The line “Trump camp puts forward witness to refute sex assault claim” is from article editors.
[/quote]No, it is the “Trump camp puts forward…”:
Oct 14, 10:55 AM:
Defending running mate Donald Trump, Republican vice presidential candidate Mike Pence told TODAY’s Matt Lauer and Savannah Guthrie Friday that the evidence to disprove Trump’s accusers was just “hours” away from being made public.“Stay tuned, there’s more information coming forward,” Pence explained during a live interview.
http://www.today.com/news/mike-pence-today-show-says-evidence-disproving-trump-s-accusers-t103941
“In an exclusive interview arranged by the campaign, Gilberthorpe said he was on the flight — in either 1980 or 1981— where Jessica Leeds claimed Trump groped her.”
http://nypost.com/2016/10/14/trump-camp-puts-forward-witness-to-refute-sex-assault-claim/
If Pence says information is “coming forward” and then the Trump campaign arranges an interview with that source, then the Trump camp put that information forward. Period.
October 15, 2016 at 6:10 PM #802358Anonymous
Guest[quote=ucodegen]Sorry, but your whole reasoning is beyond WTF. I did not say what you quoted, though I think you wish I had said it that way because it would be easier to attack.
Do proper attribution of quotes not restating in words you wish I said but attributing it to me. Your approach destroys any credibility in what you state.[/quote]
I’m sure if you provide enough details about Trump’s fleet of aircraft you’ll prove that he’s not a pervert.
Please go on…
October 15, 2016 at 6:45 PM #802359Participant[quote=FlyerInHi][quote=ucodegen]
More like prove it and being very careful of how words are crafted and why. As for arranging – that is not the same as vetting. I think there are other shoes to fall here.
[/quote]OMG, we have to be careful about language where Trump is concerned?
[/quote]Yes. If you allow one side to be so syntactically ‘careful’ as to get by with “it depends upon what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is”, got to be just as careful with the other side.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.