Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Question about my Realtor
- This topic has 135 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 5 months ago by
sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
August 31, 2010 at 6:03 AM #17891
-
August 31, 2010 at 9:02 AM #597817
Anonymous
GuestWhy do you need an agent in the first place? Are you not capable of searching properties for yourself using sdlookup, redfin, etc?
-
August 31, 2010 at 10:24 AM #597847
sobmaz
ParticipantI can’t get into the houses without an agent. I can’t negotiate with the selling mls agent without either her or some other agent representing me.
I look everyday on sdlook up. I saw that house listed and contacted my agent to look at it. It happened to be his listing as I found out later on.
The only way I know of to see houses without agents is open houses or breaking in.
-
August 31, 2010 at 11:34 AM #597892
Anonymous
GuestYou know you can represent yourself. THere is no law that says you need an agent. This isn’t rocket science.
-
August 31, 2010 at 11:35 AM #597902
Aecetia
ParticipantDeadzone,
I like the way you think.
-
August 31, 2010 at 11:35 AM #597997
Aecetia
ParticipantDeadzone,
I like the way you think.
-
August 31, 2010 at 11:35 AM #598544
Aecetia
ParticipantDeadzone,
I like the way you think.
-
August 31, 2010 at 11:35 AM #598651
Aecetia
ParticipantDeadzone,
I like the way you think.
-
August 31, 2010 at 11:35 AM #598968
Aecetia
ParticipantDeadzone,
I like the way you think.
-
August 31, 2010 at 12:35 PM #597958
sdrealtor
ParticipantIt isnt rocket science and you dont need an agent. However, a good agent will protect you and help you make better decisions. If you go directly to the listing agent it is important to consider their primary allegiance is to the seller not you. The listing agent is also under no obligation to share any of the commission with you and many wont. With all that said feel free to go direct, it may work out for you better and it may not. You wont know for sure until you know for sure.
-
September 1, 2010 at 1:22 PM #598699
drboom
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]It isnt rocket science and you dont need an agent. However, a good agent will protect you and help you make better decisions. If you go directly to the listing agent it is important to consider their primary allegiance is to the seller not you. The listing agent is also under no obligation to share any of the commission with you and many wont. With all that said feel free to go direct, it may work out for you better and it may not. You wont know for sure until you know for sure.[/quote]
sdr speaks wisdom as usual.
I don’t think it’s realistic for Joe Consumer to operate without professional help (I tried for a while), but that doesn’t mean you have to go the “full service” route. When I bought my house last year, I negotiated a commission split with my agent and did all my own research.
It worked out well for both of us: he showed me exactly one house rather than driving me all over creation, and I got the benefit of his experience and–above all–persistence throughout the annoying long short sale process … along with a check for about 1% of the house’s value.
Prior to engaging my agent, seller’s agents had flatly refused to discuss commission splits with me.
-
September 1, 2010 at 1:47 PM #598704
sdrealtor
ParticipantAbsolutely and many cant split commissions with you. When I used to work for one of the Big Boys I could not have but now that i have my own gig, I can do whatever I think makes good business sense.
-
September 1, 2010 at 1:47 PM #598797
sdrealtor
ParticipantAbsolutely and many cant split commissions with you. When I used to work for one of the Big Boys I could not have but now that i have my own gig, I can do whatever I think makes good business sense.
-
September 1, 2010 at 1:47 PM #599340
sdrealtor
ParticipantAbsolutely and many cant split commissions with you. When I used to work for one of the Big Boys I could not have but now that i have my own gig, I can do whatever I think makes good business sense.
-
September 1, 2010 at 1:47 PM #599447
sdrealtor
ParticipantAbsolutely and many cant split commissions with you. When I used to work for one of the Big Boys I could not have but now that i have my own gig, I can do whatever I think makes good business sense.
-
September 1, 2010 at 1:47 PM #599765
sdrealtor
ParticipantAbsolutely and many cant split commissions with you. When I used to work for one of the Big Boys I could not have but now that i have my own gig, I can do whatever I think makes good business sense.
-
September 1, 2010 at 1:22 PM #598792
drboom
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]It isnt rocket science and you dont need an agent. However, a good agent will protect you and help you make better decisions. If you go directly to the listing agent it is important to consider their primary allegiance is to the seller not you. The listing agent is also under no obligation to share any of the commission with you and many wont. With all that said feel free to go direct, it may work out for you better and it may not. You wont know for sure until you know for sure.[/quote]
sdr speaks wisdom as usual.
I don’t think it’s realistic for Joe Consumer to operate without professional help (I tried for a while), but that doesn’t mean you have to go the “full service” route. When I bought my house last year, I negotiated a commission split with my agent and did all my own research.
It worked out well for both of us: he showed me exactly one house rather than driving me all over creation, and I got the benefit of his experience and–above all–persistence throughout the annoying long short sale process … along with a check for about 1% of the house’s value.
Prior to engaging my agent, seller’s agents had flatly refused to discuss commission splits with me.
-
September 1, 2010 at 1:22 PM #599335
drboom
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]It isnt rocket science and you dont need an agent. However, a good agent will protect you and help you make better decisions. If you go directly to the listing agent it is important to consider their primary allegiance is to the seller not you. The listing agent is also under no obligation to share any of the commission with you and many wont. With all that said feel free to go direct, it may work out for you better and it may not. You wont know for sure until you know for sure.[/quote]
sdr speaks wisdom as usual.
I don’t think it’s realistic for Joe Consumer to operate without professional help (I tried for a while), but that doesn’t mean you have to go the “full service” route. When I bought my house last year, I negotiated a commission split with my agent and did all my own research.
It worked out well for both of us: he showed me exactly one house rather than driving me all over creation, and I got the benefit of his experience and–above all–persistence throughout the annoying long short sale process … along with a check for about 1% of the house’s value.
Prior to engaging my agent, seller’s agents had flatly refused to discuss commission splits with me.
-
September 1, 2010 at 1:22 PM #599442
drboom
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]It isnt rocket science and you dont need an agent. However, a good agent will protect you and help you make better decisions. If you go directly to the listing agent it is important to consider their primary allegiance is to the seller not you. The listing agent is also under no obligation to share any of the commission with you and many wont. With all that said feel free to go direct, it may work out for you better and it may not. You wont know for sure until you know for sure.[/quote]
sdr speaks wisdom as usual.
I don’t think it’s realistic for Joe Consumer to operate without professional help (I tried for a while), but that doesn’t mean you have to go the “full service” route. When I bought my house last year, I negotiated a commission split with my agent and did all my own research.
It worked out well for both of us: he showed me exactly one house rather than driving me all over creation, and I got the benefit of his experience and–above all–persistence throughout the annoying long short sale process … along with a check for about 1% of the house’s value.
Prior to engaging my agent, seller’s agents had flatly refused to discuss commission splits with me.
-
September 1, 2010 at 1:22 PM #599760
drboom
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]It isnt rocket science and you dont need an agent. However, a good agent will protect you and help you make better decisions. If you go directly to the listing agent it is important to consider their primary allegiance is to the seller not you. The listing agent is also under no obligation to share any of the commission with you and many wont. With all that said feel free to go direct, it may work out for you better and it may not. You wont know for sure until you know for sure.[/quote]
sdr speaks wisdom as usual.
I don’t think it’s realistic for Joe Consumer to operate without professional help (I tried for a while), but that doesn’t mean you have to go the “full service” route. When I bought my house last year, I negotiated a commission split with my agent and did all my own research.
It worked out well for both of us: he showed me exactly one house rather than driving me all over creation, and I got the benefit of his experience and–above all–persistence throughout the annoying long short sale process … along with a check for about 1% of the house’s value.
Prior to engaging my agent, seller’s agents had flatly refused to discuss commission splits with me.
-
August 31, 2010 at 12:35 PM #598054
sdrealtor
ParticipantIt isnt rocket science and you dont need an agent. However, a good agent will protect you and help you make better decisions. If you go directly to the listing agent it is important to consider their primary allegiance is to the seller not you. The listing agent is also under no obligation to share any of the commission with you and many wont. With all that said feel free to go direct, it may work out for you better and it may not. You wont know for sure until you know for sure.
-
August 31, 2010 at 12:35 PM #598599
sdrealtor
ParticipantIt isnt rocket science and you dont need an agent. However, a good agent will protect you and help you make better decisions. If you go directly to the listing agent it is important to consider their primary allegiance is to the seller not you. The listing agent is also under no obligation to share any of the commission with you and many wont. With all that said feel free to go direct, it may work out for you better and it may not. You wont know for sure until you know for sure.
-
August 31, 2010 at 12:35 PM #598706
sdrealtor
ParticipantIt isnt rocket science and you dont need an agent. However, a good agent will protect you and help you make better decisions. If you go directly to the listing agent it is important to consider their primary allegiance is to the seller not you. The listing agent is also under no obligation to share any of the commission with you and many wont. With all that said feel free to go direct, it may work out for you better and it may not. You wont know for sure until you know for sure.
-
August 31, 2010 at 12:35 PM #599023
sdrealtor
ParticipantIt isnt rocket science and you dont need an agent. However, a good agent will protect you and help you make better decisions. If you go directly to the listing agent it is important to consider their primary allegiance is to the seller not you. The listing agent is also under no obligation to share any of the commission with you and many wont. With all that said feel free to go direct, it may work out for you better and it may not. You wont know for sure until you know for sure.
-
August 31, 2010 at 11:34 AM #597987
Anonymous
GuestYou know you can represent yourself. THere is no law that says you need an agent. This isn’t rocket science.
-
August 31, 2010 at 11:34 AM #598534
Anonymous
GuestYou know you can represent yourself. THere is no law that says you need an agent. This isn’t rocket science.
-
August 31, 2010 at 11:34 AM #598641
Anonymous
GuestYou know you can represent yourself. THere is no law that says you need an agent. This isn’t rocket science.
-
August 31, 2010 at 11:34 AM #598958
Anonymous
GuestYou know you can represent yourself. THere is no law that says you need an agent. This isn’t rocket science.
-
-
August 31, 2010 at 10:24 AM #597941
sobmaz
ParticipantI can’t get into the houses without an agent. I can’t negotiate with the selling mls agent without either her or some other agent representing me.
I look everyday on sdlook up. I saw that house listed and contacted my agent to look at it. It happened to be his listing as I found out later on.
The only way I know of to see houses without agents is open houses or breaking in.
-
August 31, 2010 at 10:24 AM #598489
sobmaz
ParticipantI can’t get into the houses without an agent. I can’t negotiate with the selling mls agent without either her or some other agent representing me.
I look everyday on sdlook up. I saw that house listed and contacted my agent to look at it. It happened to be his listing as I found out later on.
The only way I know of to see houses without agents is open houses or breaking in.
-
August 31, 2010 at 10:24 AM #598596
sobmaz
ParticipantI can’t get into the houses without an agent. I can’t negotiate with the selling mls agent without either her or some other agent representing me.
I look everyday on sdlook up. I saw that house listed and contacted my agent to look at it. It happened to be his listing as I found out later on.
The only way I know of to see houses without agents is open houses or breaking in.
-
August 31, 2010 at 10:24 AM #598913
sobmaz
ParticipantI can’t get into the houses without an agent. I can’t negotiate with the selling mls agent without either her or some other agent representing me.
I look everyday on sdlook up. I saw that house listed and contacted my agent to look at it. It happened to be his listing as I found out later on.
The only way I know of to see houses without agents is open houses or breaking in.
-
August 31, 2010 at 10:26 AM #597851
sobmaz
ParticipantDo you know how to buy from the MLS without agents? If so, please share.
-
August 31, 2010 at 11:33 AM #597887
Anonymous
GuestWhy don’t you contact the selling agent directly?
-
August 31, 2010 at 11:33 AM #597982
Anonymous
GuestWhy don’t you contact the selling agent directly?
-
August 31, 2010 at 11:33 AM #598529
Anonymous
GuestWhy don’t you contact the selling agent directly?
-
August 31, 2010 at 11:33 AM #598636
Anonymous
GuestWhy don’t you contact the selling agent directly?
-
August 31, 2010 at 11:33 AM #598953
Anonymous
GuestWhy don’t you contact the selling agent directly?
-
August 31, 2010 at 12:29 PM #597948
all
Participant[quote=sobmaz]Do you know how to buy from the MLS without agents? If so, please share.[/quote]
If there is a sign just get the agent’s number from it and call the listing agent directly.
Public part of the listing includes the listing agency. Look up the agency, get the phone number, call and tell them you are interested in the property.
Someone (sdr?) shared fairly inexpensive way to get limited (read only) access to MLS few years ago. IIRC, the trick is to sign up for a realtor class and CSUSM had it for $400 or so. With that you get access to private section, which includes the listing agent’s phone number, private notes and more.
-
August 31, 2010 at 12:29 PM #598044
all
Participant[quote=sobmaz]Do you know how to buy from the MLS without agents? If so, please share.[/quote]
If there is a sign just get the agent’s number from it and call the listing agent directly.
Public part of the listing includes the listing agency. Look up the agency, get the phone number, call and tell them you are interested in the property.
Someone (sdr?) shared fairly inexpensive way to get limited (read only) access to MLS few years ago. IIRC, the trick is to sign up for a realtor class and CSUSM had it for $400 or so. With that you get access to private section, which includes the listing agent’s phone number, private notes and more.
-
August 31, 2010 at 12:29 PM #598589
all
Participant[quote=sobmaz]Do you know how to buy from the MLS without agents? If so, please share.[/quote]
If there is a sign just get the agent’s number from it and call the listing agent directly.
Public part of the listing includes the listing agency. Look up the agency, get the phone number, call and tell them you are interested in the property.
Someone (sdr?) shared fairly inexpensive way to get limited (read only) access to MLS few years ago. IIRC, the trick is to sign up for a realtor class and CSUSM had it for $400 or so. With that you get access to private section, which includes the listing agent’s phone number, private notes and more.
-
August 31, 2010 at 12:29 PM #598696
all
Participant[quote=sobmaz]Do you know how to buy from the MLS without agents? If so, please share.[/quote]
If there is a sign just get the agent’s number from it and call the listing agent directly.
Public part of the listing includes the listing agency. Look up the agency, get the phone number, call and tell them you are interested in the property.
Someone (sdr?) shared fairly inexpensive way to get limited (read only) access to MLS few years ago. IIRC, the trick is to sign up for a realtor class and CSUSM had it for $400 or so. With that you get access to private section, which includes the listing agent’s phone number, private notes and more.
-
August 31, 2010 at 12:29 PM #599013
all
Participant[quote=sobmaz]Do you know how to buy from the MLS without agents? If so, please share.[/quote]
If there is a sign just get the agent’s number from it and call the listing agent directly.
Public part of the listing includes the listing agency. Look up the agency, get the phone number, call and tell them you are interested in the property.
Someone (sdr?) shared fairly inexpensive way to get limited (read only) access to MLS few years ago. IIRC, the trick is to sign up for a realtor class and CSUSM had it for $400 or so. With that you get access to private section, which includes the listing agent’s phone number, private notes and more.
-
-
August 31, 2010 at 10:26 AM #597946
sobmaz
ParticipantDo you know how to buy from the MLS without agents? If so, please share.
-
August 31, 2010 at 10:26 AM #598494
sobmaz
ParticipantDo you know how to buy from the MLS without agents? If so, please share.
-
August 31, 2010 at 10:26 AM #598601
sobmaz
ParticipantDo you know how to buy from the MLS without agents? If so, please share.
-
August 31, 2010 at 10:26 AM #598918
sobmaz
ParticipantDo you know how to buy from the MLS without agents? If so, please share.
-
-
August 31, 2010 at 9:02 AM #597911
Anonymous
GuestWhy do you need an agent in the first place? Are you not capable of searching properties for yourself using sdlookup, redfin, etc?
-
August 31, 2010 at 9:02 AM #598459
Anonymous
GuestWhy do you need an agent in the first place? Are you not capable of searching properties for yourself using sdlookup, redfin, etc?
-
August 31, 2010 at 9:02 AM #598566
Anonymous
GuestWhy do you need an agent in the first place? Are you not capable of searching properties for yourself using sdlookup, redfin, etc?
-
August 31, 2010 at 9:02 AM #598883
Anonymous
GuestWhy do you need an agent in the first place? Are you not capable of searching properties for yourself using sdlookup, redfin, etc?
-
August 31, 2010 at 12:12 PM #597933
DWCAP
ParticipantWhat I want to know is why you made an appointment for 4 days later? Were you out of town? Was the agent? If not, then why did you wait so long?
Also, Id talk to that agent, and ask WTF? depending upon his answer, you may need a new agent. Obviously there was appointment times ahead of yours.
-
August 31, 2010 at 12:12 PM #598029
DWCAP
ParticipantWhat I want to know is why you made an appointment for 4 days later? Were you out of town? Was the agent? If not, then why did you wait so long?
Also, Id talk to that agent, and ask WTF? depending upon his answer, you may need a new agent. Obviously there was appointment times ahead of yours.
-
August 31, 2010 at 12:12 PM #598574
DWCAP
ParticipantWhat I want to know is why you made an appointment for 4 days later? Were you out of town? Was the agent? If not, then why did you wait so long?
Also, Id talk to that agent, and ask WTF? depending upon his answer, you may need a new agent. Obviously there was appointment times ahead of yours.
-
August 31, 2010 at 12:12 PM #598681
DWCAP
ParticipantWhat I want to know is why you made an appointment for 4 days later? Were you out of town? Was the agent? If not, then why did you wait so long?
Also, Id talk to that agent, and ask WTF? depending upon his answer, you may need a new agent. Obviously there was appointment times ahead of yours.
-
August 31, 2010 at 12:12 PM #598998
DWCAP
ParticipantWhat I want to know is why you made an appointment for 4 days later? Were you out of town? Was the agent? If not, then why did you wait so long?
Also, Id talk to that agent, and ask WTF? depending upon his answer, you may need a new agent. Obviously there was appointment times ahead of yours.
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:45 PM #598046
sobmaz
ParticipantJeeze!
The listing agent WAS MY AGENT! Please read original post.
The 4 day thing was when we were both available. Our standard relationship is, if there is a need to see the place ASAP we will drop what we are doing and go look at it. Since SHE WAS THE LISTING AGENT, past history indicates had she known of a pending offer she would have called to tell me. She did it many times before on other listing that were not hers so it was an unspoken given.
Let me ask again…………THE SITUATION…… My agent had a short sale that I wanted to see. We made an appointment to see it 4 days after I called her. She said there were no offers as SHE WAS THE LISTING AGENT, she should know.
My question was basically, since SHE WAS THE LISTING AGENT, shouldn’t she have called me and said, “we have a pending offer we better get you in there to look at it ASAP” IF SHE WAS A GOOD AGENT? Especially since she has called me in the past and said, “Sobmaz, I found out there is an offer so we probably want to see it right away”.
Which then brings motive. Why would she treat this situation differently? What I am getting at is did she put her concern for commission in front of my desire for the best deal? Short sale commissions are much much smaller.
Now please, don’t assume I am so stupid to know that an agent does not always put their interests ahead their clients but usually it is more subtle. This seems to be blatant. ( Or am I wrong?)
I am asking nothing else. I know on any house I can call the listing agent directly, I have done it many times but MY AGENT WAS THE LISTING AGENT. I know I could represent my self but an Agent still has to let me into the house. An agent still has to be dealt with…….BUT….I am not asking those questions.
Forgive me if I sound a little perturbed but I was basically asking a simple question about the ethics of my Realtor and the answers I get were more like how stupid I am for not representing myself and only dealing with the listing agent and blah blah.
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:47 PM #598056
briansd1
Guestsobmaz, it sounds to me like the agent liked someone else better than you.
Or perhaps she felt that the other buyer would be more likely to close on the deal than you.
It doesn’t mean that your agent is a bad agent… But from some reason, the other buyer rated higher than you did.
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:56 PM #598071
sobmaz
ParticipantThanks
Are you an agent?
I am a solid buyer and would be paying mostly cash, if not all.
That is why I have got to wonder if that is the reason. I am such a solid buyer in fact that she knows someday she will get 3% (or 5 or 6%) from a sale so why waste me on a deal that brings 1%? It is my understanding that short sales only bring 1%.
I have been really loyal to this agent and intend to remain so but not if I feel like she is doing me wrong and that is what I am trying to get to the bottom of.
Thanks
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:56 PM #598165
sobmaz
ParticipantThanks
Are you an agent?
I am a solid buyer and would be paying mostly cash, if not all.
That is why I have got to wonder if that is the reason. I am such a solid buyer in fact that she knows someday she will get 3% (or 5 or 6%) from a sale so why waste me on a deal that brings 1%? It is my understanding that short sales only bring 1%.
I have been really loyal to this agent and intend to remain so but not if I feel like she is doing me wrong and that is what I am trying to get to the bottom of.
Thanks
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:56 PM #598710
sobmaz
ParticipantThanks
Are you an agent?
I am a solid buyer and would be paying mostly cash, if not all.
That is why I have got to wonder if that is the reason. I am such a solid buyer in fact that she knows someday she will get 3% (or 5 or 6%) from a sale so why waste me on a deal that brings 1%? It is my understanding that short sales only bring 1%.
I have been really loyal to this agent and intend to remain so but not if I feel like she is doing me wrong and that is what I am trying to get to the bottom of.
Thanks
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:56 PM #598816
sobmaz
ParticipantThanks
Are you an agent?
I am a solid buyer and would be paying mostly cash, if not all.
That is why I have got to wonder if that is the reason. I am such a solid buyer in fact that she knows someday she will get 3% (or 5 or 6%) from a sale so why waste me on a deal that brings 1%? It is my understanding that short sales only bring 1%.
I have been really loyal to this agent and intend to remain so but not if I feel like she is doing me wrong and that is what I am trying to get to the bottom of.
Thanks
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:56 PM #599133
sobmaz
ParticipantThanks
Are you an agent?
I am a solid buyer and would be paying mostly cash, if not all.
That is why I have got to wonder if that is the reason. I am such a solid buyer in fact that she knows someday she will get 3% (or 5 or 6%) from a sale so why waste me on a deal that brings 1%? It is my understanding that short sales only bring 1%.
I have been really loyal to this agent and intend to remain so but not if I feel like she is doing me wrong and that is what I am trying to get to the bottom of.
Thanks
-
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:47 PM #598150
briansd1
Guestsobmaz, it sounds to me like the agent liked someone else better than you.
Or perhaps she felt that the other buyer would be more likely to close on the deal than you.
It doesn’t mean that your agent is a bad agent… But from some reason, the other buyer rated higher than you did.
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:47 PM #598695
briansd1
Guestsobmaz, it sounds to me like the agent liked someone else better than you.
Or perhaps she felt that the other buyer would be more likely to close on the deal than you.
It doesn’t mean that your agent is a bad agent… But from some reason, the other buyer rated higher than you did.
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:47 PM #598801
briansd1
Guestsobmaz, it sounds to me like the agent liked someone else better than you.
Or perhaps she felt that the other buyer would be more likely to close on the deal than you.
It doesn’t mean that your agent is a bad agent… But from some reason, the other buyer rated higher than you did.
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:47 PM #599118
briansd1
Guestsobmaz, it sounds to me like the agent liked someone else better than you.
Or perhaps she felt that the other buyer would be more likely to close on the deal than you.
It doesn’t mean that your agent is a bad agent… But from some reason, the other buyer rated higher than you did.
-
September 1, 2010 at 12:26 PM #598654
ArmoRealtor
ParticipantThere are all types of agents and all kinds of reasons they would act one way or another.
If I were you…I would ask your agent why they did not express the urgency to you to have a look at the home in less than 4 days or call you when they received an offer. They most likely have some sort of reason and if they don’t or if their answer does not live up to your expectations you may want to find another one.
There are plenty of good agents and plenty that are not as good…just like any profession.
-
September 1, 2010 at 12:26 PM #598747
ArmoRealtor
ParticipantThere are all types of agents and all kinds of reasons they would act one way or another.
If I were you…I would ask your agent why they did not express the urgency to you to have a look at the home in less than 4 days or call you when they received an offer. They most likely have some sort of reason and if they don’t or if their answer does not live up to your expectations you may want to find another one.
There are plenty of good agents and plenty that are not as good…just like any profession.
-
September 1, 2010 at 12:26 PM #599290
ArmoRealtor
ParticipantThere are all types of agents and all kinds of reasons they would act one way or another.
If I were you…I would ask your agent why they did not express the urgency to you to have a look at the home in less than 4 days or call you when they received an offer. They most likely have some sort of reason and if they don’t or if their answer does not live up to your expectations you may want to find another one.
There are plenty of good agents and plenty that are not as good…just like any profession.
-
September 1, 2010 at 12:26 PM #599397
ArmoRealtor
ParticipantThere are all types of agents and all kinds of reasons they would act one way or another.
If I were you…I would ask your agent why they did not express the urgency to you to have a look at the home in less than 4 days or call you when they received an offer. They most likely have some sort of reason and if they don’t or if their answer does not live up to your expectations you may want to find another one.
There are plenty of good agents and plenty that are not as good…just like any profession.
-
September 1, 2010 at 12:26 PM #599714
ArmoRealtor
ParticipantThere are all types of agents and all kinds of reasons they would act one way or another.
If I were you…I would ask your agent why they did not express the urgency to you to have a look at the home in less than 4 days or call you when they received an offer. They most likely have some sort of reason and if they don’t or if their answer does not live up to your expectations you may want to find another one.
There are plenty of good agents and plenty that are not as good…just like any profession.
-
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:45 PM #598140
sobmaz
ParticipantJeeze!
The listing agent WAS MY AGENT! Please read original post.
The 4 day thing was when we were both available. Our standard relationship is, if there is a need to see the place ASAP we will drop what we are doing and go look at it. Since SHE WAS THE LISTING AGENT, past history indicates had she known of a pending offer she would have called to tell me. She did it many times before on other listing that were not hers so it was an unspoken given.
Let me ask again…………THE SITUATION…… My agent had a short sale that I wanted to see. We made an appointment to see it 4 days after I called her. She said there were no offers as SHE WAS THE LISTING AGENT, she should know.
My question was basically, since SHE WAS THE LISTING AGENT, shouldn’t she have called me and said, “we have a pending offer we better get you in there to look at it ASAP” IF SHE WAS A GOOD AGENT? Especially since she has called me in the past and said, “Sobmaz, I found out there is an offer so we probably want to see it right away”.
Which then brings motive. Why would she treat this situation differently? What I am getting at is did she put her concern for commission in front of my desire for the best deal? Short sale commissions are much much smaller.
Now please, don’t assume I am so stupid to know that an agent does not always put their interests ahead their clients but usually it is more subtle. This seems to be blatant. ( Or am I wrong?)
I am asking nothing else. I know on any house I can call the listing agent directly, I have done it many times but MY AGENT WAS THE LISTING AGENT. I know I could represent my self but an Agent still has to let me into the house. An agent still has to be dealt with…….BUT….I am not asking those questions.
Forgive me if I sound a little perturbed but I was basically asking a simple question about the ethics of my Realtor and the answers I get were more like how stupid I am for not representing myself and only dealing with the listing agent and blah blah.
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:45 PM #598685
sobmaz
ParticipantJeeze!
The listing agent WAS MY AGENT! Please read original post.
The 4 day thing was when we were both available. Our standard relationship is, if there is a need to see the place ASAP we will drop what we are doing and go look at it. Since SHE WAS THE LISTING AGENT, past history indicates had she known of a pending offer she would have called to tell me. She did it many times before on other listing that were not hers so it was an unspoken given.
Let me ask again…………THE SITUATION…… My agent had a short sale that I wanted to see. We made an appointment to see it 4 days after I called her. She said there were no offers as SHE WAS THE LISTING AGENT, she should know.
My question was basically, since SHE WAS THE LISTING AGENT, shouldn’t she have called me and said, “we have a pending offer we better get you in there to look at it ASAP” IF SHE WAS A GOOD AGENT? Especially since she has called me in the past and said, “Sobmaz, I found out there is an offer so we probably want to see it right away”.
Which then brings motive. Why would she treat this situation differently? What I am getting at is did she put her concern for commission in front of my desire for the best deal? Short sale commissions are much much smaller.
Now please, don’t assume I am so stupid to know that an agent does not always put their interests ahead their clients but usually it is more subtle. This seems to be blatant. ( Or am I wrong?)
I am asking nothing else. I know on any house I can call the listing agent directly, I have done it many times but MY AGENT WAS THE LISTING AGENT. I know I could represent my self but an Agent still has to let me into the house. An agent still has to be dealt with…….BUT….I am not asking those questions.
Forgive me if I sound a little perturbed but I was basically asking a simple question about the ethics of my Realtor and the answers I get were more like how stupid I am for not representing myself and only dealing with the listing agent and blah blah.
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:45 PM #598791
sobmaz
ParticipantJeeze!
The listing agent WAS MY AGENT! Please read original post.
The 4 day thing was when we were both available. Our standard relationship is, if there is a need to see the place ASAP we will drop what we are doing and go look at it. Since SHE WAS THE LISTING AGENT, past history indicates had she known of a pending offer she would have called to tell me. She did it many times before on other listing that were not hers so it was an unspoken given.
Let me ask again…………THE SITUATION…… My agent had a short sale that I wanted to see. We made an appointment to see it 4 days after I called her. She said there were no offers as SHE WAS THE LISTING AGENT, she should know.
My question was basically, since SHE WAS THE LISTING AGENT, shouldn’t she have called me and said, “we have a pending offer we better get you in there to look at it ASAP” IF SHE WAS A GOOD AGENT? Especially since she has called me in the past and said, “Sobmaz, I found out there is an offer so we probably want to see it right away”.
Which then brings motive. Why would she treat this situation differently? What I am getting at is did she put her concern for commission in front of my desire for the best deal? Short sale commissions are much much smaller.
Now please, don’t assume I am so stupid to know that an agent does not always put their interests ahead their clients but usually it is more subtle. This seems to be blatant. ( Or am I wrong?)
I am asking nothing else. I know on any house I can call the listing agent directly, I have done it many times but MY AGENT WAS THE LISTING AGENT. I know I could represent my self but an Agent still has to let me into the house. An agent still has to be dealt with…….BUT….I am not asking those questions.
Forgive me if I sound a little perturbed but I was basically asking a simple question about the ethics of my Realtor and the answers I get were more like how stupid I am for not representing myself and only dealing with the listing agent and blah blah.
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:45 PM #599108
sobmaz
ParticipantJeeze!
The listing agent WAS MY AGENT! Please read original post.
The 4 day thing was when we were both available. Our standard relationship is, if there is a need to see the place ASAP we will drop what we are doing and go look at it. Since SHE WAS THE LISTING AGENT, past history indicates had she known of a pending offer she would have called to tell me. She did it many times before on other listing that were not hers so it was an unspoken given.
Let me ask again…………THE SITUATION…… My agent had a short sale that I wanted to see. We made an appointment to see it 4 days after I called her. She said there were no offers as SHE WAS THE LISTING AGENT, she should know.
My question was basically, since SHE WAS THE LISTING AGENT, shouldn’t she have called me and said, “we have a pending offer we better get you in there to look at it ASAP” IF SHE WAS A GOOD AGENT? Especially since she has called me in the past and said, “Sobmaz, I found out there is an offer so we probably want to see it right away”.
Which then brings motive. Why would she treat this situation differently? What I am getting at is did she put her concern for commission in front of my desire for the best deal? Short sale commissions are much much smaller.
Now please, don’t assume I am so stupid to know that an agent does not always put their interests ahead their clients but usually it is more subtle. This seems to be blatant. ( Or am I wrong?)
I am asking nothing else. I know on any house I can call the listing agent directly, I have done it many times but MY AGENT WAS THE LISTING AGENT. I know I could represent my self but an Agent still has to let me into the house. An agent still has to be dealt with…….BUT….I am not asking those questions.
Forgive me if I sound a little perturbed but I was basically asking a simple question about the ethics of my Realtor and the answers I get were more like how stupid I am for not representing myself and only dealing with the listing agent and blah blah.
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:53 PM #598066
XBoxBoy
ParticipantEnough waffling around. Sobmaz… you got screwed. Plain and simple.
Okay, maybe there’s an explanation. Maybe there’s something you don’t know. If I were you, this is what I’d do. Call my realtor and tell him/her I want a meeting. At the meeting, I wouldn’t pull punches. I’d lay it on the line. “It was your listing, I’m your client, how come I wasn’t the first person in that house taking a look and writing an offer?” If there isn’t a damned good explanation, I’d be getting another realtor.
It’s interesting that this thread turned into, “why do you need a realtor?” Well the answer to that is the realtor is “supposed” to be connected and plugged into the market. The realtor is “supposed” to be there to help you find good properties and be one of the first to get a look at them. And the realtor is “supposed” to be looking out for your interests. Sounds to me your realtor doesn’t see it that way. Fair enough, but sounds to me it’s time for you to get a new realtor.
XBoxBoy
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:02 PM #598086
sobmaz
Participant[quote=XBoxBoy]Enough waffling around. Sobmaz… you got screwed. Plain and simple.
Okay, maybe there’s an explanation. Maybe there’s something you don’t know. If I were you, this is what I’d do. Call my realtor and tell him/her I want a meeting. At the meeting, I wouldn’t pull punches. I’d lay it on the line. “It was your listing, I’m your client, how come I wasn’t the first person in that house taking a look and writing an offer?” If there isn’t a damned good explanation, I’d be getting another realtor.
It’s interesting that this thread turned into, “why do you need a realtor?” Well the answer to that is the realtor is “supposed” to be connected and plugged into the market. The realtor is “supposed” to be there to help you find good properties and be one of the first to get a look at them. And the realtor is “supposed” to be looking out for your interests. Sounds to me your realtor doesn’t see it that way. Fair enough, but sounds to me it’s time for you to get a new realtor.
XBoxBoy[/quote]
Yep, that is what I am thinking and that is why I posted. I have pretty much decided to dump the agent but thought I would post here and see if someone could tell me why I was wrong.
This Agent has spent a lot of time on me so that is why I feel loyal but I am not a pushover.
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:02 PM #598180
sobmaz
Participant[quote=XBoxBoy]Enough waffling around. Sobmaz… you got screwed. Plain and simple.
Okay, maybe there’s an explanation. Maybe there’s something you don’t know. If I were you, this is what I’d do. Call my realtor and tell him/her I want a meeting. At the meeting, I wouldn’t pull punches. I’d lay it on the line. “It was your listing, I’m your client, how come I wasn’t the first person in that house taking a look and writing an offer?” If there isn’t a damned good explanation, I’d be getting another realtor.
It’s interesting that this thread turned into, “why do you need a realtor?” Well the answer to that is the realtor is “supposed” to be connected and plugged into the market. The realtor is “supposed” to be there to help you find good properties and be one of the first to get a look at them. And the realtor is “supposed” to be looking out for your interests. Sounds to me your realtor doesn’t see it that way. Fair enough, but sounds to me it’s time for you to get a new realtor.
XBoxBoy[/quote]
Yep, that is what I am thinking and that is why I posted. I have pretty much decided to dump the agent but thought I would post here and see if someone could tell me why I was wrong.
This Agent has spent a lot of time on me so that is why I feel loyal but I am not a pushover.
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:02 PM #598725
sobmaz
Participant[quote=XBoxBoy]Enough waffling around. Sobmaz… you got screwed. Plain and simple.
Okay, maybe there’s an explanation. Maybe there’s something you don’t know. If I were you, this is what I’d do. Call my realtor and tell him/her I want a meeting. At the meeting, I wouldn’t pull punches. I’d lay it on the line. “It was your listing, I’m your client, how come I wasn’t the first person in that house taking a look and writing an offer?” If there isn’t a damned good explanation, I’d be getting another realtor.
It’s interesting that this thread turned into, “why do you need a realtor?” Well the answer to that is the realtor is “supposed” to be connected and plugged into the market. The realtor is “supposed” to be there to help you find good properties and be one of the first to get a look at them. And the realtor is “supposed” to be looking out for your interests. Sounds to me your realtor doesn’t see it that way. Fair enough, but sounds to me it’s time for you to get a new realtor.
XBoxBoy[/quote]
Yep, that is what I am thinking and that is why I posted. I have pretty much decided to dump the agent but thought I would post here and see if someone could tell me why I was wrong.
This Agent has spent a lot of time on me so that is why I feel loyal but I am not a pushover.
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:02 PM #598831
sobmaz
Participant[quote=XBoxBoy]Enough waffling around. Sobmaz… you got screwed. Plain and simple.
Okay, maybe there’s an explanation. Maybe there’s something you don’t know. If I were you, this is what I’d do. Call my realtor and tell him/her I want a meeting. At the meeting, I wouldn’t pull punches. I’d lay it on the line. “It was your listing, I’m your client, how come I wasn’t the first person in that house taking a look and writing an offer?” If there isn’t a damned good explanation, I’d be getting another realtor.
It’s interesting that this thread turned into, “why do you need a realtor?” Well the answer to that is the realtor is “supposed” to be connected and plugged into the market. The realtor is “supposed” to be there to help you find good properties and be one of the first to get a look at them. And the realtor is “supposed” to be looking out for your interests. Sounds to me your realtor doesn’t see it that way. Fair enough, but sounds to me it’s time for you to get a new realtor.
XBoxBoy[/quote]
Yep, that is what I am thinking and that is why I posted. I have pretty much decided to dump the agent but thought I would post here and see if someone could tell me why I was wrong.
This Agent has spent a lot of time on me so that is why I feel loyal but I am not a pushover.
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:02 PM #599148
sobmaz
Participant[quote=XBoxBoy]Enough waffling around. Sobmaz… you got screwed. Plain and simple.
Okay, maybe there’s an explanation. Maybe there’s something you don’t know. If I were you, this is what I’d do. Call my realtor and tell him/her I want a meeting. At the meeting, I wouldn’t pull punches. I’d lay it on the line. “It was your listing, I’m your client, how come I wasn’t the first person in that house taking a look and writing an offer?” If there isn’t a damned good explanation, I’d be getting another realtor.
It’s interesting that this thread turned into, “why do you need a realtor?” Well the answer to that is the realtor is “supposed” to be connected and plugged into the market. The realtor is “supposed” to be there to help you find good properties and be one of the first to get a look at them. And the realtor is “supposed” to be looking out for your interests. Sounds to me your realtor doesn’t see it that way. Fair enough, but sounds to me it’s time for you to get a new realtor.
XBoxBoy[/quote]
Yep, that is what I am thinking and that is why I posted. I have pretty much decided to dump the agent but thought I would post here and see if someone could tell me why I was wrong.
This Agent has spent a lot of time on me so that is why I feel loyal but I am not a pushover.
-
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:53 PM #598160
XBoxBoy
ParticipantEnough waffling around. Sobmaz… you got screwed. Plain and simple.
Okay, maybe there’s an explanation. Maybe there’s something you don’t know. If I were you, this is what I’d do. Call my realtor and tell him/her I want a meeting. At the meeting, I wouldn’t pull punches. I’d lay it on the line. “It was your listing, I’m your client, how come I wasn’t the first person in that house taking a look and writing an offer?” If there isn’t a damned good explanation, I’d be getting another realtor.
It’s interesting that this thread turned into, “why do you need a realtor?” Well the answer to that is the realtor is “supposed” to be connected and plugged into the market. The realtor is “supposed” to be there to help you find good properties and be one of the first to get a look at them. And the realtor is “supposed” to be looking out for your interests. Sounds to me your realtor doesn’t see it that way. Fair enough, but sounds to me it’s time for you to get a new realtor.
XBoxBoy
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:53 PM #598705
XBoxBoy
ParticipantEnough waffling around. Sobmaz… you got screwed. Plain and simple.
Okay, maybe there’s an explanation. Maybe there’s something you don’t know. If I were you, this is what I’d do. Call my realtor and tell him/her I want a meeting. At the meeting, I wouldn’t pull punches. I’d lay it on the line. “It was your listing, I’m your client, how come I wasn’t the first person in that house taking a look and writing an offer?” If there isn’t a damned good explanation, I’d be getting another realtor.
It’s interesting that this thread turned into, “why do you need a realtor?” Well the answer to that is the realtor is “supposed” to be connected and plugged into the market. The realtor is “supposed” to be there to help you find good properties and be one of the first to get a look at them. And the realtor is “supposed” to be looking out for your interests. Sounds to me your realtor doesn’t see it that way. Fair enough, but sounds to me it’s time for you to get a new realtor.
XBoxBoy
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:53 PM #598811
XBoxBoy
ParticipantEnough waffling around. Sobmaz… you got screwed. Plain and simple.
Okay, maybe there’s an explanation. Maybe there’s something you don’t know. If I were you, this is what I’d do. Call my realtor and tell him/her I want a meeting. At the meeting, I wouldn’t pull punches. I’d lay it on the line. “It was your listing, I’m your client, how come I wasn’t the first person in that house taking a look and writing an offer?” If there isn’t a damned good explanation, I’d be getting another realtor.
It’s interesting that this thread turned into, “why do you need a realtor?” Well the answer to that is the realtor is “supposed” to be connected and plugged into the market. The realtor is “supposed” to be there to help you find good properties and be one of the first to get a look at them. And the realtor is “supposed” to be looking out for your interests. Sounds to me your realtor doesn’t see it that way. Fair enough, but sounds to me it’s time for you to get a new realtor.
XBoxBoy
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:53 PM #599128
XBoxBoy
ParticipantEnough waffling around. Sobmaz… you got screwed. Plain and simple.
Okay, maybe there’s an explanation. Maybe there’s something you don’t know. If I were you, this is what I’d do. Call my realtor and tell him/her I want a meeting. At the meeting, I wouldn’t pull punches. I’d lay it on the line. “It was your listing, I’m your client, how come I wasn’t the first person in that house taking a look and writing an offer?” If there isn’t a damned good explanation, I’d be getting another realtor.
It’s interesting that this thread turned into, “why do you need a realtor?” Well the answer to that is the realtor is “supposed” to be connected and plugged into the market. The realtor is “supposed” to be there to help you find good properties and be one of the first to get a look at them. And the realtor is “supposed” to be looking out for your interests. Sounds to me your realtor doesn’t see it that way. Fair enough, but sounds to me it’s time for you to get a new realtor.
XBoxBoy
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:56 PM #598076
DWCAP
ParticipantI dont know about all that. That is why I asked about why the appt was 4 days in the future. Her first priority on that house was to represent the seller, not you. Now it would have been nice to do both, but she had a contract with them, and an understanding with you. Which one do you think she should represent first?
Say a day later some guy calls, says he wants to see it on the spot, and then writes an offer then and there. WHat is she suppose to do? Say, “Sorry, I have other people coming in the next couple of days and I want them to get the house, so I am gonna hold your offer?”
Sucks for you. I understand your frustration. Nice houses at good prices are rare gems right now.
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:09 PM #598091
briansd1
Guest[quote=DWCAP]
Sucks for you. I understand your frustration. Nice houses at good prices are rare gems right now.[/quote]I think that sobmaz was wondering why the agent didn’t call her to see if she wanted to put in an offer. That’s the least the agent could have done for a loyal customer. Then the ball would have been in sobmaz’s court.
Getting sobmaz involved in the offer would also have better represented the interests of the seller who might have gotten a better price, had sobmaz’ bid been higher.
I’m thinking that, for some reason, the agent (who was also the listing agent) wanted to sell the house to the other party. Why? we don’t know.
I agree with xbox. The agent screwed both the seller and sobmaz at the same time.
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:14 PM #598101
sdrealtor
ParticipantSounds a bit funky to me too. The commission on short sale should be at least 5%. Sometimes the lender will lower it if same agent represents both sides but all she needed to do was to have a colleague represent you to ensure full commission paid. Then she could throw the colleague a small bone for their time and each aprty would have separate representation which is better any way.
I think you should probably have that talk with your agent. I wouldnt be accusitory but I would want to know what happened. There could be a perfectly good reason. For her sake there better be…
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:16 PM #598106
briansd1
GuestMaybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:54 PM #598147
all
Participant[quote=briansd1]Maybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?[/quote]
Maybe the buyer is a good friend or relative of the seller?
-
August 31, 2010 at 4:08 PM #598157
briansd1
Guest[quote=captcha][quote=briansd1]Maybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?[/quote]
Maybe the buyer is a good friend or relative of the seller?[/quote]
That too.
-
August 31, 2010 at 4:08 PM #598250
briansd1
Guest[quote=captcha][quote=briansd1]Maybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?[/quote]
Maybe the buyer is a good friend or relative of the seller?[/quote]
That too.
-
August 31, 2010 at 4:08 PM #598795
briansd1
Guest[quote=captcha][quote=briansd1]Maybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?[/quote]
Maybe the buyer is a good friend or relative of the seller?[/quote]
That too.
-
August 31, 2010 at 4:08 PM #598901
briansd1
Guest[quote=captcha][quote=briansd1]Maybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?[/quote]
Maybe the buyer is a good friend or relative of the seller?[/quote]
That too.
-
August 31, 2010 at 4:08 PM #599218
briansd1
Guest[quote=captcha][quote=briansd1]Maybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?[/quote]
Maybe the buyer is a good friend or relative of the seller?[/quote]
That too.
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:54 PM #598240
all
Participant[quote=briansd1]Maybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?[/quote]
Maybe the buyer is a good friend or relative of the seller?
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:54 PM #598785
all
Participant[quote=briansd1]Maybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?[/quote]
Maybe the buyer is a good friend or relative of the seller?
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:54 PM #598891
all
Participant[quote=briansd1]Maybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?[/quote]
Maybe the buyer is a good friend or relative of the seller?
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:54 PM #599208
all
Participant[quote=briansd1]Maybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?[/quote]
Maybe the buyer is a good friend or relative of the seller?
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:16 PM #598200
briansd1
GuestMaybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:16 PM #598745
briansd1
GuestMaybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:16 PM #598851
briansd1
GuestMaybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:16 PM #599168
briansd1
GuestMaybe the buyer was a good friend or relative of the agent?
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:14 PM #598195
sdrealtor
ParticipantSounds a bit funky to me too. The commission on short sale should be at least 5%. Sometimes the lender will lower it if same agent represents both sides but all she needed to do was to have a colleague represent you to ensure full commission paid. Then she could throw the colleague a small bone for their time and each aprty would have separate representation which is better any way.
I think you should probably have that talk with your agent. I wouldnt be accusitory but I would want to know what happened. There could be a perfectly good reason. For her sake there better be…
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:14 PM #598740
sdrealtor
ParticipantSounds a bit funky to me too. The commission on short sale should be at least 5%. Sometimes the lender will lower it if same agent represents both sides but all she needed to do was to have a colleague represent you to ensure full commission paid. Then she could throw the colleague a small bone for their time and each aprty would have separate representation which is better any way.
I think you should probably have that talk with your agent. I wouldnt be accusitory but I would want to know what happened. There could be a perfectly good reason. For her sake there better be…
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:14 PM #598846
sdrealtor
ParticipantSounds a bit funky to me too. The commission on short sale should be at least 5%. Sometimes the lender will lower it if same agent represents both sides but all she needed to do was to have a colleague represent you to ensure full commission paid. Then she could throw the colleague a small bone for their time and each aprty would have separate representation which is better any way.
I think you should probably have that talk with your agent. I wouldnt be accusitory but I would want to know what happened. There could be a perfectly good reason. For her sake there better be…
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:14 PM #599163
sdrealtor
ParticipantSounds a bit funky to me too. The commission on short sale should be at least 5%. Sometimes the lender will lower it if same agent represents both sides but all she needed to do was to have a colleague represent you to ensure full commission paid. Then she could throw the colleague a small bone for their time and each aprty would have separate representation which is better any way.
I think you should probably have that talk with your agent. I wouldnt be accusitory but I would want to know what happened. There could be a perfectly good reason. For her sake there better be…
-
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:09 PM #598185
briansd1
Guest[quote=DWCAP]
Sucks for you. I understand your frustration. Nice houses at good prices are rare gems right now.[/quote]I think that sobmaz was wondering why the agent didn’t call her to see if she wanted to put in an offer. That’s the least the agent could have done for a loyal customer. Then the ball would have been in sobmaz’s court.
Getting sobmaz involved in the offer would also have better represented the interests of the seller who might have gotten a better price, had sobmaz’ bid been higher.
I’m thinking that, for some reason, the agent (who was also the listing agent) wanted to sell the house to the other party. Why? we don’t know.
I agree with xbox. The agent screwed both the seller and sobmaz at the same time.
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:09 PM #598730
briansd1
Guest[quote=DWCAP]
Sucks for you. I understand your frustration. Nice houses at good prices are rare gems right now.[/quote]I think that sobmaz was wondering why the agent didn’t call her to see if she wanted to put in an offer. That’s the least the agent could have done for a loyal customer. Then the ball would have been in sobmaz’s court.
Getting sobmaz involved in the offer would also have better represented the interests of the seller who might have gotten a better price, had sobmaz’ bid been higher.
I’m thinking that, for some reason, the agent (who was also the listing agent) wanted to sell the house to the other party. Why? we don’t know.
I agree with xbox. The agent screwed both the seller and sobmaz at the same time.
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:09 PM #598836
briansd1
Guest[quote=DWCAP]
Sucks for you. I understand your frustration. Nice houses at good prices are rare gems right now.[/quote]I think that sobmaz was wondering why the agent didn’t call her to see if she wanted to put in an offer. That’s the least the agent could have done for a loyal customer. Then the ball would have been in sobmaz’s court.
Getting sobmaz involved in the offer would also have better represented the interests of the seller who might have gotten a better price, had sobmaz’ bid been higher.
I’m thinking that, for some reason, the agent (who was also the listing agent) wanted to sell the house to the other party. Why? we don’t know.
I agree with xbox. The agent screwed both the seller and sobmaz at the same time.
-
August 31, 2010 at 3:09 PM #599153
briansd1
Guest[quote=DWCAP]
Sucks for you. I understand your frustration. Nice houses at good prices are rare gems right now.[/quote]I think that sobmaz was wondering why the agent didn’t call her to see if she wanted to put in an offer. That’s the least the agent could have done for a loyal customer. Then the ball would have been in sobmaz’s court.
Getting sobmaz involved in the offer would also have better represented the interests of the seller who might have gotten a better price, had sobmaz’ bid been higher.
I’m thinking that, for some reason, the agent (who was also the listing agent) wanted to sell the house to the other party. Why? we don’t know.
I agree with xbox. The agent screwed both the seller and sobmaz at the same time.
-
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:56 PM #598170
DWCAP
ParticipantI dont know about all that. That is why I asked about why the appt was 4 days in the future. Her first priority on that house was to represent the seller, not you. Now it would have been nice to do both, but she had a contract with them, and an understanding with you. Which one do you think she should represent first?
Say a day later some guy calls, says he wants to see it on the spot, and then writes an offer then and there. WHat is she suppose to do? Say, “Sorry, I have other people coming in the next couple of days and I want them to get the house, so I am gonna hold your offer?”
Sucks for you. I understand your frustration. Nice houses at good prices are rare gems right now.
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:56 PM #598715
DWCAP
ParticipantI dont know about all that. That is why I asked about why the appt was 4 days in the future. Her first priority on that house was to represent the seller, not you. Now it would have been nice to do both, but she had a contract with them, and an understanding with you. Which one do you think she should represent first?
Say a day later some guy calls, says he wants to see it on the spot, and then writes an offer then and there. WHat is she suppose to do? Say, “Sorry, I have other people coming in the next couple of days and I want them to get the house, so I am gonna hold your offer?”
Sucks for you. I understand your frustration. Nice houses at good prices are rare gems right now.
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:56 PM #598821
DWCAP
ParticipantI dont know about all that. That is why I asked about why the appt was 4 days in the future. Her first priority on that house was to represent the seller, not you. Now it would have been nice to do both, but she had a contract with them, and an understanding with you. Which one do you think she should represent first?
Say a day later some guy calls, says he wants to see it on the spot, and then writes an offer then and there. WHat is she suppose to do? Say, “Sorry, I have other people coming in the next couple of days and I want them to get the house, so I am gonna hold your offer?”
Sucks for you. I understand your frustration. Nice houses at good prices are rare gems right now.
-
August 31, 2010 at 2:56 PM #599138
DWCAP
ParticipantI dont know about all that. That is why I asked about why the appt was 4 days in the future. Her first priority on that house was to represent the seller, not you. Now it would have been nice to do both, but she had a contract with them, and an understanding with you. Which one do you think she should represent first?
Say a day later some guy calls, says he wants to see it on the spot, and then writes an offer then and there. WHat is she suppose to do? Say, “Sorry, I have other people coming in the next couple of days and I want them to get the house, so I am gonna hold your offer?”
Sucks for you. I understand your frustration. Nice houses at good prices are rare gems right now.
-
August 31, 2010 at 5:38 PM #598222
sreeb
ParticipantDo you know if the she represented the other buyer as well? If she did, she ends up in a pretty awkward situation getting you involved.
If someone else walked in, looked at it, and wanted to make an offer, through her on the spot, what is she going to do?
-
August 31, 2010 at 6:48 PM #598262
SD Realtor
ParticipantReading your original post I would say you were not well represented. I am going to assume that when you made the original appt there was not an offer. While you ASSUMED the agent would call you if an offer came in (which is valid) it does not sound like you told the agent to do so. However I agree that the representation was lacking and the performance of the agent was deficient. It may be a good idea for you to call the broker and present the situation to see what happened. At the very least confronting the agent and asking why the heck the agent did not call you immediately upon receiving an offer on a home you were CLEARLY interested in.
Poor performance based on your description of events.
-
August 31, 2010 at 6:48 PM #598357
SD Realtor
ParticipantReading your original post I would say you were not well represented. I am going to assume that when you made the original appt there was not an offer. While you ASSUMED the agent would call you if an offer came in (which is valid) it does not sound like you told the agent to do so. However I agree that the representation was lacking and the performance of the agent was deficient. It may be a good idea for you to call the broker and present the situation to see what happened. At the very least confronting the agent and asking why the heck the agent did not call you immediately upon receiving an offer on a home you were CLEARLY interested in.
Poor performance based on your description of events.
-
August 31, 2010 at 6:48 PM #598900
SD Realtor
ParticipantReading your original post I would say you were not well represented. I am going to assume that when you made the original appt there was not an offer. While you ASSUMED the agent would call you if an offer came in (which is valid) it does not sound like you told the agent to do so. However I agree that the representation was lacking and the performance of the agent was deficient. It may be a good idea for you to call the broker and present the situation to see what happened. At the very least confronting the agent and asking why the heck the agent did not call you immediately upon receiving an offer on a home you were CLEARLY interested in.
Poor performance based on your description of events.
-
August 31, 2010 at 6:48 PM #599006
SD Realtor
ParticipantReading your original post I would say you were not well represented. I am going to assume that when you made the original appt there was not an offer. While you ASSUMED the agent would call you if an offer came in (which is valid) it does not sound like you told the agent to do so. However I agree that the representation was lacking and the performance of the agent was deficient. It may be a good idea for you to call the broker and present the situation to see what happened. At the very least confronting the agent and asking why the heck the agent did not call you immediately upon receiving an offer on a home you were CLEARLY interested in.
Poor performance based on your description of events.
-
August 31, 2010 at 6:48 PM #599324
SD Realtor
ParticipantReading your original post I would say you were not well represented. I am going to assume that when you made the original appt there was not an offer. While you ASSUMED the agent would call you if an offer came in (which is valid) it does not sound like you told the agent to do so. However I agree that the representation was lacking and the performance of the agent was deficient. It may be a good idea for you to call the broker and present the situation to see what happened. At the very least confronting the agent and asking why the heck the agent did not call you immediately upon receiving an offer on a home you were CLEARLY interested in.
Poor performance based on your description of events.
-
August 31, 2010 at 7:48 PM #598294
briansd1
Guest[quote=sreeb]
If someone else walked in, looked at it, and wanted to make an offer, through her on the spot, what is she going to do?[/quote]
The agent would take the offer. She would also immediately call all her other potential buyers to see if they want to submit offers. Then she would submit all the offers to the seller.
In this case, the OP’s agent is the listing agent on the house in question. The listing agent’s duty is the find the best price for the seller.
Had the OP (sobmaz) been given the opportunity, she might have offered more money for the property.
Seems to me like the agent did not get the best price for house; and at the same time, she did a disservice a client buyer who really wanted that house, but was never given the opportunity to submit an offer.
The transaction really happened quickly on a great deal, so it’s more likely than not that there was some undisclosed related-party deal making.
-
September 1, 2010 at 12:28 AM #598414
CA renter
ParticipantAgreed.
Sounds like the agent didn’t represent Sombaz’s (or the seller’s) best interests, and for that, I’d seriously considering using someone else, or going directly through the listing agents, as mentioned above.
-
September 1, 2010 at 12:28 AM #598507
CA renter
ParticipantAgreed.
Sounds like the agent didn’t represent Sombaz’s (or the seller’s) best interests, and for that, I’d seriously considering using someone else, or going directly through the listing agents, as mentioned above.
-
September 1, 2010 at 12:28 AM #599050
CA renter
ParticipantAgreed.
Sounds like the agent didn’t represent Sombaz’s (or the seller’s) best interests, and for that, I’d seriously considering using someone else, or going directly through the listing agents, as mentioned above.
-
September 1, 2010 at 12:28 AM #599156
CA renter
ParticipantAgreed.
Sounds like the agent didn’t represent Sombaz’s (or the seller’s) best interests, and for that, I’d seriously considering using someone else, or going directly through the listing agents, as mentioned above.
-
September 1, 2010 at 12:28 AM #599474
CA renter
ParticipantAgreed.
Sounds like the agent didn’t represent Sombaz’s (or the seller’s) best interests, and for that, I’d seriously considering using someone else, or going directly through the listing agents, as mentioned above.
-
-
August 31, 2010 at 7:48 PM #598387
briansd1
Guest[quote=sreeb]
If someone else walked in, looked at it, and wanted to make an offer, through her on the spot, what is she going to do?[/quote]
The agent would take the offer. She would also immediately call all her other potential buyers to see if they want to submit offers. Then she would submit all the offers to the seller.
In this case, the OP’s agent is the listing agent on the house in question. The listing agent’s duty is the find the best price for the seller.
Had the OP (sobmaz) been given the opportunity, she might have offered more money for the property.
Seems to me like the agent did not get the best price for house; and at the same time, she did a disservice a client buyer who really wanted that house, but was never given the opportunity to submit an offer.
The transaction really happened quickly on a great deal, so it’s more likely than not that there was some undisclosed related-party deal making.
-
August 31, 2010 at 7:48 PM #598930
briansd1
Guest[quote=sreeb]
If someone else walked in, looked at it, and wanted to make an offer, through her on the spot, what is she going to do?[/quote]
The agent would take the offer. She would also immediately call all her other potential buyers to see if they want to submit offers. Then she would submit all the offers to the seller.
In this case, the OP’s agent is the listing agent on the house in question. The listing agent’s duty is the find the best price for the seller.
Had the OP (sobmaz) been given the opportunity, she might have offered more money for the property.
Seems to me like the agent did not get the best price for house; and at the same time, she did a disservice a client buyer who really wanted that house, but was never given the opportunity to submit an offer.
The transaction really happened quickly on a great deal, so it’s more likely than not that there was some undisclosed related-party deal making.
-
August 31, 2010 at 7:48 PM #599036
briansd1
Guest[quote=sreeb]
If someone else walked in, looked at it, and wanted to make an offer, through her on the spot, what is she going to do?[/quote]
The agent would take the offer. She would also immediately call all her other potential buyers to see if they want to submit offers. Then she would submit all the offers to the seller.
In this case, the OP’s agent is the listing agent on the house in question. The listing agent’s duty is the find the best price for the seller.
Had the OP (sobmaz) been given the opportunity, she might have offered more money for the property.
Seems to me like the agent did not get the best price for house; and at the same time, she did a disservice a client buyer who really wanted that house, but was never given the opportunity to submit an offer.
The transaction really happened quickly on a great deal, so it’s more likely than not that there was some undisclosed related-party deal making.
-
August 31, 2010 at 7:48 PM #599354
briansd1
Guest[quote=sreeb]
If someone else walked in, looked at it, and wanted to make an offer, through her on the spot, what is she going to do?[/quote]
The agent would take the offer. She would also immediately call all her other potential buyers to see if they want to submit offers. Then she would submit all the offers to the seller.
In this case, the OP’s agent is the listing agent on the house in question. The listing agent’s duty is the find the best price for the seller.
Had the OP (sobmaz) been given the opportunity, she might have offered more money for the property.
Seems to me like the agent did not get the best price for house; and at the same time, she did a disservice a client buyer who really wanted that house, but was never given the opportunity to submit an offer.
The transaction really happened quickly on a great deal, so it’s more likely than not that there was some undisclosed related-party deal making.
-
-
August 31, 2010 at 5:38 PM #598316
sreeb
ParticipantDo you know if the she represented the other buyer as well? If she did, she ends up in a pretty awkward situation getting you involved.
If someone else walked in, looked at it, and wanted to make an offer, through her on the spot, what is she going to do?
-
August 31, 2010 at 5:38 PM #598860
sreeb
ParticipantDo you know if the she represented the other buyer as well? If she did, she ends up in a pretty awkward situation getting you involved.
If someone else walked in, looked at it, and wanted to make an offer, through her on the spot, what is she going to do?
-
August 31, 2010 at 5:38 PM #598966
sreeb
ParticipantDo you know if the she represented the other buyer as well? If she did, she ends up in a pretty awkward situation getting you involved.
If someone else walked in, looked at it, and wanted to make an offer, through her on the spot, what is she going to do?
-
August 31, 2010 at 5:38 PM #599284
sreeb
ParticipantDo you know if the she represented the other buyer as well? If she did, she ends up in a pretty awkward situation getting you involved.
If someone else walked in, looked at it, and wanted to make an offer, through her on the spot, what is she going to do?
-
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.