- This topic has 28 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by
The OC Scam.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
November 12, 2007 at 10:47 AM #10888
-
November 12, 2007 at 11:32 AM #98707
pk92108
ParticipantMy uneducated guess:
Case 1 – Should qualify for 300 K…will not qualify now.
Case 2 – Should qualify for 700 k…might get 500 K
am i close??
-
November 12, 2007 at 11:39 AM #98709
sdrealtor
ParticipantCare 1 should be ok up to about 225K.
Case 2 should be Ok up to 450K. -
November 12, 2007 at 11:39 AM #98770
sdrealtor
ParticipantCare 1 should be ok up to about 225K.
Case 2 should be Ok up to 450K. -
November 12, 2007 at 11:39 AM #98786
sdrealtor
ParticipantCare 1 should be ok up to about 225K.
Case 2 should be Ok up to 450K. -
November 12, 2007 at 11:39 AM #98791
sdrealtor
ParticipantCare 1 should be ok up to about 225K.
Case 2 should be Ok up to 450K.
-
-
November 12, 2007 at 11:32 AM #98767
pk92108
ParticipantMy uneducated guess:
Case 1 – Should qualify for 300 K…will not qualify now.
Case 2 – Should qualify for 700 k…might get 500 K
am i close??
-
November 12, 2007 at 11:32 AM #98783
pk92108
ParticipantMy uneducated guess:
Case 1 – Should qualify for 300 K…will not qualify now.
Case 2 – Should qualify for 700 k…might get 500 K
am i close??
-
November 12, 2007 at 11:32 AM #98787
pk92108
ParticipantMy uneducated guess:
Case 1 – Should qualify for 300 K…will not qualify now.
Case 2 – Should qualify for 700 k…might get 500 K
am i close??
-
November 12, 2007 at 11:49 AM #98718
Raybyrnes
ParticipantFamily 1 should be able to qualify for up to $486,625 in a non targeted area or 594,764 in a targeted area on New Construction. For resale non targeted they could probably look at up to 543,859 in a non targeted area or up to $664,716 in a targeted area. They can get into these program through the CHAFA Loan Program if they are a first time homebuyer becaue they meet the eligible income requirements.
Family two is subject to market rates. They don’t qualify for CHAFA becaue their income is too high. For this family I would think they are subject ot conforming loan limits which puts there maximum loan amounts twards 450000. There 45K would reduce the loan amount under 417000 but they might still have problems with the 20% down. I would still think that a sub prime or superprime might lend money up to this dollar amount.
-
November 12, 2007 at 11:59 AM #98722
kev374
ParticipantRay, so you’re saying Family 1 will get a higher loan despite higher debt/lower income because their income qualifies for some kind of housing program? (CHAFA)?? Isn’t that ass backwards?
-
November 12, 2007 at 1:22 PM #98769
Raybyrnes
Participantkev374
Didn’t say that it makes sense. I am just looking at the qualification and family 1 qualifies for Chafa First time home owner program and Family 2 does not.
From a lender standpoint California is willing to step in and buy the one loan so they have a market to sell the loan too so there is less risk from a lender standpoint on family 1 then there is on fmaily 2. Family 2 has better traditional lending standard but the secondary market for these loan pools is drying up so they are less likely to qualify for money.
Again, I am not making a judgement here. I am just stating what I think the dollar amount s would be. Do you ahve the answer to the question? I find this interesting. You clearly asked because you or someone you know is presented with a scenario similiar to what you are describing.
-
November 12, 2007 at 10:10 PM #98835
guitar187
ParticipantNeither scenario has enough information.
You need complete employment information for the correct answer. Also, they have 10k from their savings account and then an additional 4k 401k? Or they are using their 401k as well? Why is the FICO 675? What else is on their bureau. What is their DTI?
There is a reason a COMPLETE 1003 is required. If you give partial information, you will get a partially correct answer.
-
November 12, 2007 at 10:10 PM #98893
guitar187
ParticipantNeither scenario has enough information.
You need complete employment information for the correct answer. Also, they have 10k from their savings account and then an additional 4k 401k? Or they are using their 401k as well? Why is the FICO 675? What else is on their bureau. What is their DTI?
There is a reason a COMPLETE 1003 is required. If you give partial information, you will get a partially correct answer.
-
November 12, 2007 at 10:10 PM #98909
guitar187
ParticipantNeither scenario has enough information.
You need complete employment information for the correct answer. Also, they have 10k from their savings account and then an additional 4k 401k? Or they are using their 401k as well? Why is the FICO 675? What else is on their bureau. What is their DTI?
There is a reason a COMPLETE 1003 is required. If you give partial information, you will get a partially correct answer.
-
November 12, 2007 at 10:10 PM #98916
guitar187
ParticipantNeither scenario has enough information.
You need complete employment information for the correct answer. Also, they have 10k from their savings account and then an additional 4k 401k? Or they are using their 401k as well? Why is the FICO 675? What else is on their bureau. What is their DTI?
There is a reason a COMPLETE 1003 is required. If you give partial information, you will get a partially correct answer.
-
November 12, 2007 at 1:22 PM #98829
Raybyrnes
Participantkev374
Didn’t say that it makes sense. I am just looking at the qualification and family 1 qualifies for Chafa First time home owner program and Family 2 does not.
From a lender standpoint California is willing to step in and buy the one loan so they have a market to sell the loan too so there is less risk from a lender standpoint on family 1 then there is on fmaily 2. Family 2 has better traditional lending standard but the secondary market for these loan pools is drying up so they are less likely to qualify for money.
Again, I am not making a judgement here. I am just stating what I think the dollar amount s would be. Do you ahve the answer to the question? I find this interesting. You clearly asked because you or someone you know is presented with a scenario similiar to what you are describing.
-
November 12, 2007 at 1:22 PM #98845
Raybyrnes
Participantkev374
Didn’t say that it makes sense. I am just looking at the qualification and family 1 qualifies for Chafa First time home owner program and Family 2 does not.
From a lender standpoint California is willing to step in and buy the one loan so they have a market to sell the loan too so there is less risk from a lender standpoint on family 1 then there is on fmaily 2. Family 2 has better traditional lending standard but the secondary market for these loan pools is drying up so they are less likely to qualify for money.
Again, I am not making a judgement here. I am just stating what I think the dollar amount s would be. Do you ahve the answer to the question? I find this interesting. You clearly asked because you or someone you know is presented with a scenario similiar to what you are describing.
-
November 12, 2007 at 1:22 PM #98851
Raybyrnes
Participantkev374
Didn’t say that it makes sense. I am just looking at the qualification and family 1 qualifies for Chafa First time home owner program and Family 2 does not.
From a lender standpoint California is willing to step in and buy the one loan so they have a market to sell the loan too so there is less risk from a lender standpoint on family 1 then there is on fmaily 2. Family 2 has better traditional lending standard but the secondary market for these loan pools is drying up so they are less likely to qualify for money.
Again, I am not making a judgement here. I am just stating what I think the dollar amount s would be. Do you ahve the answer to the question? I find this interesting. You clearly asked because you or someone you know is presented with a scenario similiar to what you are describing.
-
-
November 12, 2007 at 11:59 AM #98784
kev374
ParticipantRay, so you’re saying Family 1 will get a higher loan despite higher debt/lower income because their income qualifies for some kind of housing program? (CHAFA)?? Isn’t that ass backwards?
-
November 12, 2007 at 11:59 AM #98798
kev374
ParticipantRay, so you’re saying Family 1 will get a higher loan despite higher debt/lower income because their income qualifies for some kind of housing program? (CHAFA)?? Isn’t that ass backwards?
-
November 12, 2007 at 11:59 AM #98803
kev374
ParticipantRay, so you’re saying Family 1 will get a higher loan despite higher debt/lower income because their income qualifies for some kind of housing program? (CHAFA)?? Isn’t that ass backwards?
-
-
November 12, 2007 at 11:49 AM #98779
Raybyrnes
ParticipantFamily 1 should be able to qualify for up to $486,625 in a non targeted area or 594,764 in a targeted area on New Construction. For resale non targeted they could probably look at up to 543,859 in a non targeted area or up to $664,716 in a targeted area. They can get into these program through the CHAFA Loan Program if they are a first time homebuyer becaue they meet the eligible income requirements.
Family two is subject to market rates. They don’t qualify for CHAFA becaue their income is too high. For this family I would think they are subject ot conforming loan limits which puts there maximum loan amounts twards 450000. There 45K would reduce the loan amount under 417000 but they might still have problems with the 20% down. I would still think that a sub prime or superprime might lend money up to this dollar amount.
-
November 12, 2007 at 11:49 AM #98794
Raybyrnes
ParticipantFamily 1 should be able to qualify for up to $486,625 in a non targeted area or 594,764 in a targeted area on New Construction. For resale non targeted they could probably look at up to 543,859 in a non targeted area or up to $664,716 in a targeted area. They can get into these program through the CHAFA Loan Program if they are a first time homebuyer becaue they meet the eligible income requirements.
Family two is subject to market rates. They don’t qualify for CHAFA becaue their income is too high. For this family I would think they are subject ot conforming loan limits which puts there maximum loan amounts twards 450000. There 45K would reduce the loan amount under 417000 but they might still have problems with the 20% down. I would still think that a sub prime or superprime might lend money up to this dollar amount.
-
November 12, 2007 at 11:49 AM #98799
Raybyrnes
ParticipantFamily 1 should be able to qualify for up to $486,625 in a non targeted area or 594,764 in a targeted area on New Construction. For resale non targeted they could probably look at up to 543,859 in a non targeted area or up to $664,716 in a targeted area. They can get into these program through the CHAFA Loan Program if they are a first time homebuyer becaue they meet the eligible income requirements.
Family two is subject to market rates. They don’t qualify for CHAFA becaue their income is too high. For this family I would think they are subject ot conforming loan limits which puts there maximum loan amounts twards 450000. There 45K would reduce the loan amount under 417000 but they might still have problems with the 20% down. I would still think that a sub prime or superprime might lend money up to this dollar amount.
-
November 12, 2007 at 10:24 PM #98864
The OC Scam
ParticipantShould be…
Case 1 250 K
Case 2 500 K
But you know it is…
Case 1 400 k
Case 2 666+ k
little devils
-
November 12, 2007 at 10:24 PM #98922
The OC Scam
ParticipantShould be…
Case 1 250 K
Case 2 500 K
But you know it is…
Case 1 400 k
Case 2 666+ k
little devils
-
November 12, 2007 at 10:24 PM #98938
The OC Scam
ParticipantShould be…
Case 1 250 K
Case 2 500 K
But you know it is…
Case 1 400 k
Case 2 666+ k
little devils
-
November 12, 2007 at 10:24 PM #98944
The OC Scam
ParticipantShould be…
Case 1 250 K
Case 2 500 K
But you know it is…
Case 1 400 k
Case 2 666+ k
little devils
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.