- This topic has 850 replies, 31 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by fredo4.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 6, 2010 at 6:26 PM #614630October 6, 2010 at 6:27 PM #613575jstoeszParticipant
I give 5-10 post of reasoned arguments about how AB32 harms the economy. Most of which go unresponded to. I post one flawed study (a agree it is flawed) and you feel license to judge my critical thinking skills.
Post something of value BGIG, I would love to hear how AB32 is a boon to the economy.
Thanks.
October 6, 2010 at 6:27 PM #613662jstoeszParticipantI give 5-10 post of reasoned arguments about how AB32 harms the economy. Most of which go unresponded to. I post one flawed study (a agree it is flawed) and you feel license to judge my critical thinking skills.
Post something of value BGIG, I would love to hear how AB32 is a boon to the economy.
Thanks.
October 6, 2010 at 6:27 PM #614206jstoeszParticipantI give 5-10 post of reasoned arguments about how AB32 harms the economy. Most of which go unresponded to. I post one flawed study (a agree it is flawed) and you feel license to judge my critical thinking skills.
Post something of value BGIG, I would love to hear how AB32 is a boon to the economy.
Thanks.
October 6, 2010 at 6:27 PM #614322jstoeszParticipantI give 5-10 post of reasoned arguments about how AB32 harms the economy. Most of which go unresponded to. I post one flawed study (a agree it is flawed) and you feel license to judge my critical thinking skills.
Post something of value BGIG, I would love to hear how AB32 is a boon to the economy.
Thanks.
October 6, 2010 at 6:27 PM #614635jstoeszParticipantI give 5-10 post of reasoned arguments about how AB32 harms the economy. Most of which go unresponded to. I post one flawed study (a agree it is flawed) and you feel license to judge my critical thinking skills.
Post something of value BGIG, I would love to hear how AB32 is a boon to the economy.
Thanks.
October 6, 2010 at 6:59 PM #613595BigGovernmentIsGoodParticipantWhat they don’t say much about is that our air quality is improving precisely because of tightening environmental standards, that counties have seen and will continue to see property-tax windfalls as new alternative-energy projects come online, that entrepreneurs have already created hundreds of thousands of jobs in the fields of solar power, wind power and energy efficiency, and that those entrepreneurs require the certainty and stability that AB 32 guarantees in order to justify new investment.
California has an estimated 12,000 clean-energy businesses up and running now. Taking our efforts to the next level should yield even greater results.
http://www.bakersfield.com/opinion/editorials/x1441324370/Keep-up-momentum-reject-Prop-23
Compare the 12,000 clean-energy businesses in California to the untold number of fishing, tourism, and other businesses that depend on them destroyed by Big Oil on the Gulf Coast.
October 6, 2010 at 6:59 PM #613682BigGovernmentIsGoodParticipantWhat they don’t say much about is that our air quality is improving precisely because of tightening environmental standards, that counties have seen and will continue to see property-tax windfalls as new alternative-energy projects come online, that entrepreneurs have already created hundreds of thousands of jobs in the fields of solar power, wind power and energy efficiency, and that those entrepreneurs require the certainty and stability that AB 32 guarantees in order to justify new investment.
California has an estimated 12,000 clean-energy businesses up and running now. Taking our efforts to the next level should yield even greater results.
http://www.bakersfield.com/opinion/editorials/x1441324370/Keep-up-momentum-reject-Prop-23
Compare the 12,000 clean-energy businesses in California to the untold number of fishing, tourism, and other businesses that depend on them destroyed by Big Oil on the Gulf Coast.
October 6, 2010 at 6:59 PM #614226BigGovernmentIsGoodParticipantWhat they don’t say much about is that our air quality is improving precisely because of tightening environmental standards, that counties have seen and will continue to see property-tax windfalls as new alternative-energy projects come online, that entrepreneurs have already created hundreds of thousands of jobs in the fields of solar power, wind power and energy efficiency, and that those entrepreneurs require the certainty and stability that AB 32 guarantees in order to justify new investment.
California has an estimated 12,000 clean-energy businesses up and running now. Taking our efforts to the next level should yield even greater results.
http://www.bakersfield.com/opinion/editorials/x1441324370/Keep-up-momentum-reject-Prop-23
Compare the 12,000 clean-energy businesses in California to the untold number of fishing, tourism, and other businesses that depend on them destroyed by Big Oil on the Gulf Coast.
October 6, 2010 at 6:59 PM #614341BigGovernmentIsGoodParticipantWhat they don’t say much about is that our air quality is improving precisely because of tightening environmental standards, that counties have seen and will continue to see property-tax windfalls as new alternative-energy projects come online, that entrepreneurs have already created hundreds of thousands of jobs in the fields of solar power, wind power and energy efficiency, and that those entrepreneurs require the certainty and stability that AB 32 guarantees in order to justify new investment.
California has an estimated 12,000 clean-energy businesses up and running now. Taking our efforts to the next level should yield even greater results.
http://www.bakersfield.com/opinion/editorials/x1441324370/Keep-up-momentum-reject-Prop-23
Compare the 12,000 clean-energy businesses in California to the untold number of fishing, tourism, and other businesses that depend on them destroyed by Big Oil on the Gulf Coast.
October 6, 2010 at 6:59 PM #614654BigGovernmentIsGoodParticipantWhat they don’t say much about is that our air quality is improving precisely because of tightening environmental standards, that counties have seen and will continue to see property-tax windfalls as new alternative-energy projects come online, that entrepreneurs have already created hundreds of thousands of jobs in the fields of solar power, wind power and energy efficiency, and that those entrepreneurs require the certainty and stability that AB 32 guarantees in order to justify new investment.
California has an estimated 12,000 clean-energy businesses up and running now. Taking our efforts to the next level should yield even greater results.
http://www.bakersfield.com/opinion/editorials/x1441324370/Keep-up-momentum-reject-Prop-23
Compare the 12,000 clean-energy businesses in California to the untold number of fishing, tourism, and other businesses that depend on them destroyed by Big Oil on the Gulf Coast.
October 6, 2010 at 7:02 PM #613605enron_by_the_seaParticipant[quote=danielwis]Has there ever been a proposition to rescind a proposition? It seems voters have buyers remorse afterwards when they find out how expensive some of these propositions become.[/quote]
Prop 27 this cycle proposes to repeal prop 11 of 2008.
The original Prop 11 (of 2008) took away the task of redistricting (for assembly districts) away from CA legislature. Prop 27 attempts to invalidate that.
Needless to say, most politicians (starting from Nancy Pelosi and down) are supporting Prop.27. PLEASE VOTE NO ON PROP 27. Politicians should not decide their own districts. It perpetuates incumbency.
To confuse matters further, there is Prop. 20 on the ballot which basically says the opposite and even takes away the power to redistrict congressional districts away from legislature. (Hopefully you will vote YES on that.)
If both prop. 20 and 27 pass, the one with maximum votes wins….
October 6, 2010 at 7:02 PM #613692enron_by_the_seaParticipant[quote=danielwis]Has there ever been a proposition to rescind a proposition? It seems voters have buyers remorse afterwards when they find out how expensive some of these propositions become.[/quote]
Prop 27 this cycle proposes to repeal prop 11 of 2008.
The original Prop 11 (of 2008) took away the task of redistricting (for assembly districts) away from CA legislature. Prop 27 attempts to invalidate that.
Needless to say, most politicians (starting from Nancy Pelosi and down) are supporting Prop.27. PLEASE VOTE NO ON PROP 27. Politicians should not decide their own districts. It perpetuates incumbency.
To confuse matters further, there is Prop. 20 on the ballot which basically says the opposite and even takes away the power to redistrict congressional districts away from legislature. (Hopefully you will vote YES on that.)
If both prop. 20 and 27 pass, the one with maximum votes wins….
October 6, 2010 at 7:02 PM #614236enron_by_the_seaParticipant[quote=danielwis]Has there ever been a proposition to rescind a proposition? It seems voters have buyers remorse afterwards when they find out how expensive some of these propositions become.[/quote]
Prop 27 this cycle proposes to repeal prop 11 of 2008.
The original Prop 11 (of 2008) took away the task of redistricting (for assembly districts) away from CA legislature. Prop 27 attempts to invalidate that.
Needless to say, most politicians (starting from Nancy Pelosi and down) are supporting Prop.27. PLEASE VOTE NO ON PROP 27. Politicians should not decide their own districts. It perpetuates incumbency.
To confuse matters further, there is Prop. 20 on the ballot which basically says the opposite and even takes away the power to redistrict congressional districts away from legislature. (Hopefully you will vote YES on that.)
If both prop. 20 and 27 pass, the one with maximum votes wins….
October 6, 2010 at 7:02 PM #614351enron_by_the_seaParticipant[quote=danielwis]Has there ever been a proposition to rescind a proposition? It seems voters have buyers remorse afterwards when they find out how expensive some of these propositions become.[/quote]
Prop 27 this cycle proposes to repeal prop 11 of 2008.
The original Prop 11 (of 2008) took away the task of redistricting (for assembly districts) away from CA legislature. Prop 27 attempts to invalidate that.
Needless to say, most politicians (starting from Nancy Pelosi and down) are supporting Prop.27. PLEASE VOTE NO ON PROP 27. Politicians should not decide their own districts. It perpetuates incumbency.
To confuse matters further, there is Prop. 20 on the ballot which basically says the opposite and even takes away the power to redistrict congressional districts away from legislature. (Hopefully you will vote YES on that.)
If both prop. 20 and 27 pass, the one with maximum votes wins….
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.