Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › plunging birthrate
- This topic has 515 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 6, 2011 at 10:59 AM #702518June 6, 2011 at 11:30 AM #701323
an
Participant[quote=ctr70]This is just purely anecdotal from my circle and what I’ve observed, and I have NO data to support this…but it seems like:
1. People are having much smaller families than when I was growing up in the 70’s and 80’s (1-2 kids is the norm now vs. 3-5 kids then…my parents had 6 kids born in the 1960’s and 1970’s)
2. College educated higher income people especially seem to be either having no kids at all, or having them much later in life than the past
3. I am not as sure of trends in terms of family size and age having children within the lower income, lower educational levels (I would assume it to be larger families and having children at earlier ages)[/quote]
Are you sure you’re not describing the movie Idiocracy?June 6, 2011 at 11:30 AM #701421an
Participant[quote=ctr70]This is just purely anecdotal from my circle and what I’ve observed, and I have NO data to support this…but it seems like:
1. People are having much smaller families than when I was growing up in the 70’s and 80’s (1-2 kids is the norm now vs. 3-5 kids then…my parents had 6 kids born in the 1960’s and 1970’s)
2. College educated higher income people especially seem to be either having no kids at all, or having them much later in life than the past
3. I am not as sure of trends in terms of family size and age having children within the lower income, lower educational levels (I would assume it to be larger families and having children at earlier ages)[/quote]
Are you sure you’re not describing the movie Idiocracy?June 6, 2011 at 11:30 AM #702014an
Participant[quote=ctr70]This is just purely anecdotal from my circle and what I’ve observed, and I have NO data to support this…but it seems like:
1. People are having much smaller families than when I was growing up in the 70’s and 80’s (1-2 kids is the norm now vs. 3-5 kids then…my parents had 6 kids born in the 1960’s and 1970’s)
2. College educated higher income people especially seem to be either having no kids at all, or having them much later in life than the past
3. I am not as sure of trends in terms of family size and age having children within the lower income, lower educational levels (I would assume it to be larger families and having children at earlier ages)[/quote]
Are you sure you’re not describing the movie Idiocracy?June 6, 2011 at 11:30 AM #702163an
Participant[quote=ctr70]This is just purely anecdotal from my circle and what I’ve observed, and I have NO data to support this…but it seems like:
1. People are having much smaller families than when I was growing up in the 70’s and 80’s (1-2 kids is the norm now vs. 3-5 kids then…my parents had 6 kids born in the 1960’s and 1970’s)
2. College educated higher income people especially seem to be either having no kids at all, or having them much later in life than the past
3. I am not as sure of trends in terms of family size and age having children within the lower income, lower educational levels (I would assume it to be larger families and having children at earlier ages)[/quote]
Are you sure you’re not describing the movie Idiocracy?June 6, 2011 at 11:30 AM #702524an
Participant[quote=ctr70]This is just purely anecdotal from my circle and what I’ve observed, and I have NO data to support this…but it seems like:
1. People are having much smaller families than when I was growing up in the 70’s and 80’s (1-2 kids is the norm now vs. 3-5 kids then…my parents had 6 kids born in the 1960’s and 1970’s)
2. College educated higher income people especially seem to be either having no kids at all, or having them much later in life than the past
3. I am not as sure of trends in terms of family size and age having children within the lower income, lower educational levels (I would assume it to be larger families and having children at earlier ages)[/quote]
Are you sure you’re not describing the movie Idiocracy?June 6, 2011 at 3:10 PM #701348UCGal
Participant[quote=ctr70]This is just purely anecdotal from my circle and what I’ve observed, and I have NO data to support this…but it seems like:
1. People are having much smaller families than when I was growing up in the 70’s and 80’s (1-2 kids is the norm now vs. 3-5 kids then…my parents had 6 kids born in the 1960’s and 1970’s)
2. College educated higher income people especially seem to be either having no kids at all, or having them much later in life than the past
3. I am not as sure of trends in terms of family size and age having children within the lower income, lower educational levels (I would assume it to be larger families and having children at earlier ages)[/quote]
I’m active on a “mom’s message board”… It’s about 70 women who all have kids born the same month/year… from 4 different countries.
On that board the number of families with 4 or more kids is greater than the number of families with just 1 child. So… based on this VERY limited data source (so really useless.
Actually… I just looked at the memberlist and did a quick tally of kids/member… average is 2.3 kids per mom. I think because the majority of members have 2 kids.
5 had 1 child, and 6 had 4 or more kids. (Based on a quick tally)
Also, of the single child mom’s… secondary infertility was a factor in more than one. In other words, they wanted more kids…
June 6, 2011 at 3:10 PM #701446UCGal
Participant[quote=ctr70]This is just purely anecdotal from my circle and what I’ve observed, and I have NO data to support this…but it seems like:
1. People are having much smaller families than when I was growing up in the 70’s and 80’s (1-2 kids is the norm now vs. 3-5 kids then…my parents had 6 kids born in the 1960’s and 1970’s)
2. College educated higher income people especially seem to be either having no kids at all, or having them much later in life than the past
3. I am not as sure of trends in terms of family size and age having children within the lower income, lower educational levels (I would assume it to be larger families and having children at earlier ages)[/quote]
I’m active on a “mom’s message board”… It’s about 70 women who all have kids born the same month/year… from 4 different countries.
On that board the number of families with 4 or more kids is greater than the number of families with just 1 child. So… based on this VERY limited data source (so really useless.
Actually… I just looked at the memberlist and did a quick tally of kids/member… average is 2.3 kids per mom. I think because the majority of members have 2 kids.
5 had 1 child, and 6 had 4 or more kids. (Based on a quick tally)
Also, of the single child mom’s… secondary infertility was a factor in more than one. In other words, they wanted more kids…
June 6, 2011 at 3:10 PM #702039UCGal
Participant[quote=ctr70]This is just purely anecdotal from my circle and what I’ve observed, and I have NO data to support this…but it seems like:
1. People are having much smaller families than when I was growing up in the 70’s and 80’s (1-2 kids is the norm now vs. 3-5 kids then…my parents had 6 kids born in the 1960’s and 1970’s)
2. College educated higher income people especially seem to be either having no kids at all, or having them much later in life than the past
3. I am not as sure of trends in terms of family size and age having children within the lower income, lower educational levels (I would assume it to be larger families and having children at earlier ages)[/quote]
I’m active on a “mom’s message board”… It’s about 70 women who all have kids born the same month/year… from 4 different countries.
On that board the number of families with 4 or more kids is greater than the number of families with just 1 child. So… based on this VERY limited data source (so really useless.
Actually… I just looked at the memberlist and did a quick tally of kids/member… average is 2.3 kids per mom. I think because the majority of members have 2 kids.
5 had 1 child, and 6 had 4 or more kids. (Based on a quick tally)
Also, of the single child mom’s… secondary infertility was a factor in more than one. In other words, they wanted more kids…
June 6, 2011 at 3:10 PM #702188UCGal
Participant[quote=ctr70]This is just purely anecdotal from my circle and what I’ve observed, and I have NO data to support this…but it seems like:
1. People are having much smaller families than when I was growing up in the 70’s and 80’s (1-2 kids is the norm now vs. 3-5 kids then…my parents had 6 kids born in the 1960’s and 1970’s)
2. College educated higher income people especially seem to be either having no kids at all, or having them much later in life than the past
3. I am not as sure of trends in terms of family size and age having children within the lower income, lower educational levels (I would assume it to be larger families and having children at earlier ages)[/quote]
I’m active on a “mom’s message board”… It’s about 70 women who all have kids born the same month/year… from 4 different countries.
On that board the number of families with 4 or more kids is greater than the number of families with just 1 child. So… based on this VERY limited data source (so really useless.
Actually… I just looked at the memberlist and did a quick tally of kids/member… average is 2.3 kids per mom. I think because the majority of members have 2 kids.
5 had 1 child, and 6 had 4 or more kids. (Based on a quick tally)
Also, of the single child mom’s… secondary infertility was a factor in more than one. In other words, they wanted more kids…
June 6, 2011 at 3:10 PM #702549UCGal
Participant[quote=ctr70]This is just purely anecdotal from my circle and what I’ve observed, and I have NO data to support this…but it seems like:
1. People are having much smaller families than when I was growing up in the 70’s and 80’s (1-2 kids is the norm now vs. 3-5 kids then…my parents had 6 kids born in the 1960’s and 1970’s)
2. College educated higher income people especially seem to be either having no kids at all, or having them much later in life than the past
3. I am not as sure of trends in terms of family size and age having children within the lower income, lower educational levels (I would assume it to be larger families and having children at earlier ages)[/quote]
I’m active on a “mom’s message board”… It’s about 70 women who all have kids born the same month/year… from 4 different countries.
On that board the number of families with 4 or more kids is greater than the number of families with just 1 child. So… based on this VERY limited data source (so really useless.
Actually… I just looked at the memberlist and did a quick tally of kids/member… average is 2.3 kids per mom. I think because the majority of members have 2 kids.
5 had 1 child, and 6 had 4 or more kids. (Based on a quick tally)
Also, of the single child mom’s… secondary infertility was a factor in more than one. In other words, they wanted more kids…
June 7, 2011 at 11:05 AM #701417barnaby33
ParticipantI’d be curious to know why woemen chose to have x or y kids? UCGal does your quick tally break down kids/family by nationality or age?
I’ve never felt any pressure to have kids, but most people seem to. I’m just curious what drives the number they envision having.
JoshJune 7, 2011 at 11:05 AM #701516barnaby33
ParticipantI’d be curious to know why woemen chose to have x or y kids? UCGal does your quick tally break down kids/family by nationality or age?
I’ve never felt any pressure to have kids, but most people seem to. I’m just curious what drives the number they envision having.
JoshJune 7, 2011 at 11:05 AM #702110barnaby33
ParticipantI’d be curious to know why woemen chose to have x or y kids? UCGal does your quick tally break down kids/family by nationality or age?
I’ve never felt any pressure to have kids, but most people seem to. I’m just curious what drives the number they envision having.
JoshJune 7, 2011 at 11:05 AM #702258barnaby33
ParticipantI’d be curious to know why woemen chose to have x or y kids? UCGal does your quick tally break down kids/family by nationality or age?
I’ve never felt any pressure to have kids, but most people seem to. I’m just curious what drives the number they envision having.
Josh -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
