plunging birthrate

[njtosd]

I don’t think you read the posting. It said the following:

“Virtually all health insurance plans could soon be required to offer female patients free coverage of prescription birth control”

It has nothing to do with the insurance industry making a decision to be, in your words “smart enough to know what’s good for them.” Nothing in this world is free; legislators simply decide who is going to pay for things. And most people prefer that someone else pay. And frankly, if it’s such a good idea why is it only prescription birth control for women? Why not all birth control used by women or men? Where’s the logic there?

And you know what? If we eliminated all babies, we wouldn’t even need birth control! What a savings.

[briansd1]

Actually I believe that, in this case, the insurance companies want to provide coverage. That’s why the insurance lobby has been quiet.

The big insurance companies want to provide coverage but they want coverage evenly spread out so no company is at a competitive disadvantage.

The insurance companies also want the cover of legislation to avoid having to deal with the religious groups.

If I ran a health insurance company, I’d give out free condoms to men and pills to women who want them. I would mail the condoms to the men who request them, and I’d make the women pay the copay for the doctor’s visits. But the pills would be free generics.

[briansd1]

Actually I believe that, in this case, the insurance companies want to provide coverage. That’s why the insurance lobby has been quiet.

The big insurance companies want to provide coverage but they want coverage evenly spread out so no company is at a competitive disadvantage.

The insurance companies also want the cover of legislation to avoid having to deal with the religious groups.

If I ran a health insurance company, I’d give out free condoms to men and pills to women who want them. I would mail the condoms to the men who request them, and I’d make the women pay the copay for the doctor’s visits. But the pills would be free generics.

[briansd1]

Actually I believe that, in this case, the insurance companies want to provide coverage. That’s why the insurance lobby has been quiet.

The big insurance companies want to provide coverage but they want coverage evenly spread out so no company is at a competitive disadvantage.

The insurance companies also want the cover of legislation to avoid having to deal with the religious groups.

If I ran a health insurance company, I’d give out free condoms to men and pills to women who want them. I would mail the condoms to the men who request them, and I’d make the women pay the copay for the doctor’s visits. But the pills would be free generics.

[briansd1]

Actually I believe that, in this case, the insurance companies want to provide coverage. That’s why the insurance lobby has been quiet.

The big insurance companies want to provide coverage but they want coverage evenly spread out so no company is at a competitive disadvantage.

The insurance companies also want the cover of legislation to avoid having to deal with the religious groups.

If I ran a health insurance company, I’d give out free condoms to men and pills to women who want them. I would mail the condoms to the men who request them, and I’d make the women pay the copay for the doctor’s visits. But the pills would be free generics.

[briansd1]

Actually I believe that, in this case, the insurance companies want to provide coverage. That’s why the insurance lobby has been quiet.

The big insurance companies want to provide coverage but they want coverage evenly spread out so no company is at a competitive disadvantage.

The insurance companies also want the cover of legislation to avoid having to deal with the religious groups.

If I ran a health insurance company, I’d give out free condoms to men and pills to women who want them. I would mail the condoms to the men who request them, and I’d make the women pay the copay for the doctor’s visits. But the pills would be free generics.

[Author]

Posts