Pakistan, endgame scenario

[jimmyle]

I have heard from a US marine that, in the event that Muslim fundamentalists over throw the Pakistani government, the US military will take over the country and seize all the nuclear war heads. Assuming that we are successful in controlling all the nuclear weapons. Where would we find enough troops to keep 175 mil people in check, will a draft be necessary? Do you think this scenario is likely to happen?

[NotCranky]

Your comments put the appropriate scale to the issue. To think that our issues in the middle east are about pulling out of Iraq or not ,as one would think from watching the presidential debate is rediculous.
The same old striving of empires, over what has been one of the most the most important pieces of real estate on the planet for thousands of years is what is at root of all this strife. The U.S. is and has been simply taking the baton from G.B and her/our allies in western europe in the struggle.

That will be on network news tonight completely free of propaganda.

Maybe if the military branches put recruiting stations in La Jolla, Del Mar, CV and places like that throughout the U.S. won’t need a draft?

[NotCranky]

Your comments put the appropriate scale to the issue. To think that our issues in the middle east are about pulling out of Iraq or not ,as one would think from watching the presidential debate is rediculous.
The same old striving of empires, over what has been one of the most the most important pieces of real estate on the planet for thousands of years is what is at root of all this strife. The U.S. is and has been simply taking the baton from G.B and her/our allies in western europe in the struggle.

That will be on network news tonight completely free of propaganda.

Maybe if the military branches put recruiting stations in La Jolla, Del Mar, CV and places like that throughout the U.S. won’t need a draft?

[NotCranky]

Your comments put the appropriate scale to the issue. To think that our issues in the middle east are about pulling out of Iraq or not ,as one would think from watching the presidential debate is rediculous.
The same old striving of empires, over what has been one of the most the most important pieces of real estate on the planet for thousands of years is what is at root of all this strife. The U.S. is and has been simply taking the baton from G.B and her/our allies in western europe in the struggle.

That will be on network news tonight completely free of propaganda.

Maybe if the military branches put recruiting stations in La Jolla, Del Mar, CV and places like that throughout the U.S. won’t need a draft?

[NotCranky]

Your comments put the appropriate scale to the issue. To think that our issues in the middle east are about pulling out of Iraq or not ,as one would think from watching the presidential debate is rediculous.
The same old striving of empires, over what has been one of the most the most important pieces of real estate on the planet for thousands of years is what is at root of all this strife. The U.S. is and has been simply taking the baton from G.B and her/our allies in western europe in the struggle.

That will be on network news tonight completely free of propaganda.

Maybe if the military branches put recruiting stations in La Jolla, Del Mar, CV and places like that throughout the U.S. won’t need a draft?

[NotCranky]

Your comments put the appropriate scale to the issue. To think that our issues in the middle east are about pulling out of Iraq or not ,as one would think from watching the presidential debate is rediculous.
The same old striving of empires, over what has been one of the most the most important pieces of real estate on the planet for thousands of years is what is at root of all this strife. The U.S. is and has been simply taking the baton from G.B and her/our allies in western europe in the struggle.

That will be on network news tonight completely free of propaganda.

Maybe if the military branches put recruiting stations in La Jolla, Del Mar, CV and places like that throughout the U.S. won’t need a draft?

[Arty]

I don’t know. If we fail on that, we are declaring war on a nuclear power.

[Sandi Egan]

I think progress cannot be stopped. Soon or late every country worth its square mileage will be able to develop some kind of powerful weaponry. We can’t invade them all.

[Ricechex]

If it happens, there will be no draft. They will give our taxpayer dollars to no bid contracts like Halliburton and Raytheon, and the work will be done by hired mercenaries.

[svelte]

We have never invaded a country with nuke weapons. We only invade weak practically defenseless countries.

Don’t hold your breath on us going into Pakistan.

[Sandi Egan]

We have never invaded a country with nuke weapons. We only invade weak practically defenseless countries.

Good point

[VoZangre]

Nuke-ity Nuke Nuke Nuke…

if its good for the goose…

US policy on Nukes is hypocritical, transparent, ad absurdum….

couple K of overjuiced mercenaries would go up like a wisp of smoke never to be seen heard from or buried….

[VoZangre]

Nuke-ity Nuke Nuke Nuke…

if its good for the goose…

US policy on Nukes is hypocritical, transparent, ad absurdum….

couple K of overjuiced mercenaries would go up like a wisp of smoke never to be seen heard from or buried….

[VoZangre]

Nuke-ity Nuke Nuke Nuke…

if its good for the goose…

US policy on Nukes is hypocritical, transparent, ad absurdum….

couple K of overjuiced mercenaries would go up like a wisp of smoke never to be seen heard from or buried….

[VoZangre]

Nuke-ity Nuke Nuke Nuke…

if its good for the goose…

US policy on Nukes is hypocritical, transparent, ad absurdum….

couple K of overjuiced mercenaries would go up like a wisp of smoke never to be seen heard from or buried….

[VoZangre]

Nuke-ity Nuke Nuke Nuke…

if its good for the goose…

US policy on Nukes is hypocritical, transparent, ad absurdum….

couple K of overjuiced mercenaries would go up like a wisp of smoke never to be seen heard from or buried….

[NotCranky]

We only invade weak practically defenseless countries.

These practically defenseless countries are at particular risk if they have oil and/or are close to our allies’ nuclear and conventionally armed enemies. These invasions and occupations are in large part about protecting them and pretection of trade and transport for the western collective imperial team of which the U.S is captain.

The U.S. could probably shoot down a Nuke aimed at this country,especially since they were removed from Cuba but Israel, Spain and England etc. are at greater risk. Enemy nuclear countries know that nukes don’t make the balance of power equal if in the end they can be nuked into oblivion. If western allies let Pakistan know that they will be nuked from some comination of Israel, India, Western Europe, Afghanistan, Iraq, the gulf of Oman and the air above, I don’t think they will think too long on the nuclear option.

On the other hand the threat of a hand carried nuclear devices being employed in important places in western civilization or other “terrorist acts” may start to level the playing field. Let’s hope all these warmongers don’t level the earth.It is amazing that we hear so much more about global warming than this.

[NotCranky]

We only invade weak practically defenseless countries.

These practically defenseless countries are at particular risk if they have oil and/or are close to our allies’ nuclear and conventionally armed enemies. These invasions and occupations are in large part about protecting them and pretection of trade and transport for the western collective imperial team of which the U.S is captain.

The U.S. could probably shoot down a Nuke aimed at this country,especially since they were removed from Cuba but Israel, Spain and England etc. are at greater risk. Enemy nuclear countries know that nukes don’t make the balance of power equal if in the end they can be nuked into oblivion. If western allies let Pakistan know that they will be nuked from some comination of Israel, India, Western Europe, Afghanistan, Iraq, the gulf of Oman and the air above, I don’t think they will think too long on the nuclear option.

On the other hand the threat of a hand carried nuclear devices being employed in important places in western civilization or other “terrorist acts” may start to level the playing field. Let’s hope all these warmongers don’t level the earth.It is amazing that we hear so much more about global warming than this.

[NotCranky]

We only invade weak practically defenseless countries.

These practically defenseless countries are at particular risk if they have oil and/or are close to our allies’ nuclear and conventionally armed enemies. These invasions and occupations are in large part about protecting them and pretection of trade and transport for the western collective imperial team of which the U.S is captain.

The U.S. could probably shoot down a Nuke aimed at this country,especially since they were removed from Cuba but Israel, Spain and England etc. are at greater risk. Enemy nuclear countries know that nukes don’t make the balance of power equal if in the end they can be nuked into oblivion. If western allies let Pakistan know that they will be nuked from some comination of Israel, India, Western Europe, Afghanistan, Iraq, the gulf of Oman and the air above, I don’t think they will think too long on the nuclear option.

On the other hand the threat of a hand carried nuclear devices being employed in important places in western civilization or other “terrorist acts” may start to level the playing field. Let’s hope all these warmongers don’t level the earth.It is amazing that we hear so much more about global warming than this.

[NotCranky]

We only invade weak practically defenseless countries.

These practically defenseless countries are at particular risk if they have oil and/or are close to our allies’ nuclear and conventionally armed enemies. These invasions and occupations are in large part about protecting them and pretection of trade and transport for the western collective imperial team of which the U.S is captain.

The U.S. could probably shoot down a Nuke aimed at this country,especially since they were removed from Cuba but Israel, Spain and England etc. are at greater risk. Enemy nuclear countries know that nukes don’t make the balance of power equal if in the end they can be nuked into oblivion. If western allies let Pakistan know that they will be nuked from some comination of Israel, India, Western Europe, Afghanistan, Iraq, the gulf of Oman and the air above, I don’t think they will think too long on the nuclear option.

On the other hand the threat of a hand carried nuclear devices being employed in important places in western civilization or other “terrorist acts” may start to level the playing field. Let’s hope all these warmongers don’t level the earth.It is amazing that we hear so much more about global warming than this.

[NotCranky]

We only invade weak practically defenseless countries.

These practically defenseless countries are at particular risk if they have oil and/or are close to our allies’ nuclear and conventionally armed enemies. These invasions and occupations are in large part about protecting them and pretection of trade and transport for the western collective imperial team of which the U.S is captain.

The U.S. could probably shoot down a Nuke aimed at this country,especially since they were removed from Cuba but Israel, Spain and England etc. are at greater risk. Enemy nuclear countries know that nukes don’t make the balance of power equal if in the end they can be nuked into oblivion. If western allies let Pakistan know that they will be nuked from some comination of Israel, India, Western Europe, Afghanistan, Iraq, the gulf of Oman and the air above, I don’t think they will think too long on the nuclear option.

On the other hand the threat of a hand carried nuclear devices being employed in important places in western civilization or other “terrorist acts” may start to level the playing field. Let’s hope all these warmongers don’t level the earth.It is amazing that we hear so much more about global warming than this.

[Sandi Egan]

We have never invaded a country with nuke weapons. We only invade weak practically defenseless countries.

Good point

[Sandi Egan]

We have never invaded a country with nuke weapons. We only invade weak practically defenseless countries.

Good point

[Sandi Egan]

We have never invaded a country with nuke weapons. We only invade weak practically defenseless countries.

Good point

[Sandi Egan]

We have never invaded a country with nuke weapons. We only invade weak practically defenseless countries.

Good point

[svelte]

We have never invaded a country with nuke weapons. We only invade weak practically defenseless countries.

Don’t hold your breath on us going into Pakistan.

[svelte]

We have never invaded a country with nuke weapons. We only invade weak practically defenseless countries.

Don’t hold your breath on us going into Pakistan.

[svelte]

We have never invaded a country with nuke weapons. We only invade weak practically defenseless countries.

Don’t hold your breath on us going into Pakistan.

[svelte]

We have never invaded a country with nuke weapons. We only invade weak practically defenseless countries.

Don’t hold your breath on us going into Pakistan.

[Ricechex]

If it happens, there will be no draft. They will give our taxpayer dollars to no bid contracts like Halliburton and Raytheon, and the work will be done by hired mercenaries.

[Ricechex]

If it happens, there will be no draft. They will give our taxpayer dollars to no bid contracts like Halliburton and Raytheon, and the work will be done by hired mercenaries.

[Ricechex]

If it happens, there will be no draft. They will give our taxpayer dollars to no bid contracts like Halliburton and Raytheon, and the work will be done by hired mercenaries.

[Ricechex]

If it happens, there will be no draft. They will give our taxpayer dollars to no bid contracts like Halliburton and Raytheon, and the work will be done by hired mercenaries.

[Sandi Egan]

I think progress cannot be stopped. Soon or late every country worth its square mileage will be able to develop some kind of powerful weaponry. We can’t invade them all.

[Sandi Egan]

I think progress cannot be stopped. Soon or late every country worth its square mileage will be able to develop some kind of powerful weaponry. We can’t invade them all.

[Sandi Egan]

I think progress cannot be stopped. Soon or late every country worth its square mileage will be able to develop some kind of powerful weaponry. We can’t invade them all.

[Sandi Egan]

I think progress cannot be stopped. Soon or late every country worth its square mileage will be able to develop some kind of powerful weaponry. We can’t invade them all.

[Arty]

I don’t know. If we fail on that, we are declaring war on a nuclear power.

[Arty]

I don’t know. If we fail on that, we are declaring war on a nuclear power.

[Arty]

I don’t know. If we fail on that, we are declaring war on a nuclear power.

[Arty]

I don’t know. If we fail on that, we are declaring war on a nuclear power.

[patb]

We don’t like invading countries without oil

besides to occupy a country with troops will require 4.5 million men

iraq is 18 M people and we’ve needed 250,000 men to keep a lid on

[patb]

We don’t like invading countries without oil

besides to occupy a country with troops will require 4.5 million men

iraq is 18 M people and we’ve needed 250,000 men to keep a lid on

[patb]

We don’t like invading countries without oil

besides to occupy a country with troops will require 4.5 million men

iraq is 18 M people and we’ve needed 250,000 men to keep a lid on

[patb]

We don’t like invading countries without oil

besides to occupy a country with troops will require 4.5 million men

iraq is 18 M people and we’ve needed 250,000 men to keep a lid on

[patb]

We don’t like invading countries without oil

besides to occupy a country with troops will require 4.5 million men

iraq is 18 M people and we’ve needed 250,000 men to keep a lid on

[Author]

Posts