- This topic has 405 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by an.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 7, 2008 at 4:45 PM #200934May 7, 2008 at 4:51 PM #200812DukehornParticipant
I didn’t know that Obama owned the MSNBC, the Washington Post, Daily Kos, Huffington Post, the Atlantic or Fox News.
Just because Clinton was unpopular from her days as First Lady doesn’t give her free reign to attack a fellow Dem in a negative matter.
As for subsequent bad news, all the negative attention on Obama has been on what other people have said like Rev. Wright.
Clinton’s wounds have been self-inflicted garbage that came out of her own mouth, namely:
a) lying about snipergate after being called out on it already.
b) gas tax holiday–stupid idea
c) telling folks that McCain had passed the CiC test and Obama hadn’t
If you’re too blind to distinguish between attacks based on what comes out of a candidate’s mouth and attacks based on associations, let’s agree to disagree.
If you want to go the Wright route, then Obama should have gone the Lewinsky route. But did he? Nope.
May 7, 2008 at 4:51 PM #200853DukehornParticipantI didn’t know that Obama owned the MSNBC, the Washington Post, Daily Kos, Huffington Post, the Atlantic or Fox News.
Just because Clinton was unpopular from her days as First Lady doesn’t give her free reign to attack a fellow Dem in a negative matter.
As for subsequent bad news, all the negative attention on Obama has been on what other people have said like Rev. Wright.
Clinton’s wounds have been self-inflicted garbage that came out of her own mouth, namely:
a) lying about snipergate after being called out on it already.
b) gas tax holiday–stupid idea
c) telling folks that McCain had passed the CiC test and Obama hadn’t
If you’re too blind to distinguish between attacks based on what comes out of a candidate’s mouth and attacks based on associations, let’s agree to disagree.
If you want to go the Wright route, then Obama should have gone the Lewinsky route. But did he? Nope.
May 7, 2008 at 4:51 PM #200881DukehornParticipantI didn’t know that Obama owned the MSNBC, the Washington Post, Daily Kos, Huffington Post, the Atlantic or Fox News.
Just because Clinton was unpopular from her days as First Lady doesn’t give her free reign to attack a fellow Dem in a negative matter.
As for subsequent bad news, all the negative attention on Obama has been on what other people have said like Rev. Wright.
Clinton’s wounds have been self-inflicted garbage that came out of her own mouth, namely:
a) lying about snipergate after being called out on it already.
b) gas tax holiday–stupid idea
c) telling folks that McCain had passed the CiC test and Obama hadn’t
If you’re too blind to distinguish between attacks based on what comes out of a candidate’s mouth and attacks based on associations, let’s agree to disagree.
If you want to go the Wright route, then Obama should have gone the Lewinsky route. But did he? Nope.
May 7, 2008 at 4:51 PM #200905DukehornParticipantI didn’t know that Obama owned the MSNBC, the Washington Post, Daily Kos, Huffington Post, the Atlantic or Fox News.
Just because Clinton was unpopular from her days as First Lady doesn’t give her free reign to attack a fellow Dem in a negative matter.
As for subsequent bad news, all the negative attention on Obama has been on what other people have said like Rev. Wright.
Clinton’s wounds have been self-inflicted garbage that came out of her own mouth, namely:
a) lying about snipergate after being called out on it already.
b) gas tax holiday–stupid idea
c) telling folks that McCain had passed the CiC test and Obama hadn’t
If you’re too blind to distinguish between attacks based on what comes out of a candidate’s mouth and attacks based on associations, let’s agree to disagree.
If you want to go the Wright route, then Obama should have gone the Lewinsky route. But did he? Nope.
May 7, 2008 at 4:51 PM #200939DukehornParticipantI didn’t know that Obama owned the MSNBC, the Washington Post, Daily Kos, Huffington Post, the Atlantic or Fox News.
Just because Clinton was unpopular from her days as First Lady doesn’t give her free reign to attack a fellow Dem in a negative matter.
As for subsequent bad news, all the negative attention on Obama has been on what other people have said like Rev. Wright.
Clinton’s wounds have been self-inflicted garbage that came out of her own mouth, namely:
a) lying about snipergate after being called out on it already.
b) gas tax holiday–stupid idea
c) telling folks that McCain had passed the CiC test and Obama hadn’t
If you’re too blind to distinguish between attacks based on what comes out of a candidate’s mouth and attacks based on associations, let’s agree to disagree.
If you want to go the Wright route, then Obama should have gone the Lewinsky route. But did he? Nope.
May 7, 2008 at 5:01 PM #200822anParticipantIf you’re too blind to distinguish between attacks based on what comes out of a candidate’s mouth and attacks based on associations, let’s agree to disagree.
Oh yes, someone who disagree with you is blind. How very open minded. But I’ll just have to agree ti disagree.If she’s as unpopular as you said she is, then why the hell can’t Obama put her away and why are we even having this conversation at this point in the primary.
Although gas tax holiday is stupid, I think raising capital gain tax to 28% is much worse.
What does Lewinsky have anything to do with Hillary? Last I check, Lewinsky wasn’t her spiritual adviser for 20+ years.
May 7, 2008 at 5:01 PM #200863anParticipantIf you’re too blind to distinguish between attacks based on what comes out of a candidate’s mouth and attacks based on associations, let’s agree to disagree.
Oh yes, someone who disagree with you is blind. How very open minded. But I’ll just have to agree ti disagree.If she’s as unpopular as you said she is, then why the hell can’t Obama put her away and why are we even having this conversation at this point in the primary.
Although gas tax holiday is stupid, I think raising capital gain tax to 28% is much worse.
What does Lewinsky have anything to do with Hillary? Last I check, Lewinsky wasn’t her spiritual adviser for 20+ years.
May 7, 2008 at 5:01 PM #200891anParticipantIf you’re too blind to distinguish between attacks based on what comes out of a candidate’s mouth and attacks based on associations, let’s agree to disagree.
Oh yes, someone who disagree with you is blind. How very open minded. But I’ll just have to agree ti disagree.If she’s as unpopular as you said she is, then why the hell can’t Obama put her away and why are we even having this conversation at this point in the primary.
Although gas tax holiday is stupid, I think raising capital gain tax to 28% is much worse.
What does Lewinsky have anything to do with Hillary? Last I check, Lewinsky wasn’t her spiritual adviser for 20+ years.
May 7, 2008 at 5:01 PM #200915anParticipantIf you’re too blind to distinguish between attacks based on what comes out of a candidate’s mouth and attacks based on associations, let’s agree to disagree.
Oh yes, someone who disagree with you is blind. How very open minded. But I’ll just have to agree ti disagree.If she’s as unpopular as you said she is, then why the hell can’t Obama put her away and why are we even having this conversation at this point in the primary.
Although gas tax holiday is stupid, I think raising capital gain tax to 28% is much worse.
What does Lewinsky have anything to do with Hillary? Last I check, Lewinsky wasn’t her spiritual adviser for 20+ years.
May 7, 2008 at 5:01 PM #200950anParticipantIf you’re too blind to distinguish between attacks based on what comes out of a candidate’s mouth and attacks based on associations, let’s agree to disagree.
Oh yes, someone who disagree with you is blind. How very open minded. But I’ll just have to agree ti disagree.If she’s as unpopular as you said she is, then why the hell can’t Obama put her away and why are we even having this conversation at this point in the primary.
Although gas tax holiday is stupid, I think raising capital gain tax to 28% is much worse.
What does Lewinsky have anything to do with Hillary? Last I check, Lewinsky wasn’t her spiritual adviser for 20+ years.
May 7, 2008 at 5:07 PM #200837afx114ParticipantIf she’s as unpopular as you said she is, then why the hell can’t Obama put her away
Lets flip this around.. if he’s as unpopular as you say he is, then why the hell can’t Clinton put him away?
May 7, 2008 at 5:07 PM #200878afx114ParticipantIf she’s as unpopular as you said she is, then why the hell can’t Obama put her away
Lets flip this around.. if he’s as unpopular as you say he is, then why the hell can’t Clinton put him away?
May 7, 2008 at 5:07 PM #200906afx114ParticipantIf she’s as unpopular as you said she is, then why the hell can’t Obama put her away
Lets flip this around.. if he’s as unpopular as you say he is, then why the hell can’t Clinton put him away?
May 7, 2008 at 5:07 PM #200930afx114ParticipantIf she’s as unpopular as you said she is, then why the hell can’t Obama put her away
Lets flip this around.. if he’s as unpopular as you say he is, then why the hell can’t Clinton put him away?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.