OT: Will Hillary concede now?

[equalizer]

you guys must have missed my earlier post. the southern strategy is alive and kicking as esmith pointed out. Only way those losers dems could have won was if they picked former Gov Warner from VA or maybe, maybe Edwards from NC. But luckily they are too stupid and egotistic to give a damn about their party and let spoiled brats Hilobomba annihilate the parties chance. You think this Obama is going to pick up eldery voters in Fl? SO, Fl lost. Swiftboaters are coming, heard home depot is running low on nooses, Willie Horton posters are being printed, nobody wants those creepy foreigner muslim types in White House. (I could go on for days)

Only hail mary pass now for you libs is to pick Kansas Gov Kathleen Sebelius as VP and have an attempt on Obama by Clinton or Limb fan to get sympathy vote.

To libs:
I went to the Lee Atwater & Roger Ailes graduate school and learned that Winning is everything is losing is for dems. Dont hate me because I’m right, I’m just the messenger, hate your party.

[Eugene]

Edwards was the VP candidate in 2004. Didn’t help one bit. He and Kerry managed to lose Edwards’ home state of NC 73%/27% among whites.

[Eugene]

Edwards was the VP candidate in 2004. Didn’t help one bit. He and Kerry managed to lose Edwards’ home state of NC 73%/27% among whites.

[Eugene]

Edwards was the VP candidate in 2004. Didn’t help one bit. He and Kerry managed to lose Edwards’ home state of NC 73%/27% among whites.

[Eugene]

Edwards was the VP candidate in 2004. Didn’t help one bit. He and Kerry managed to lose Edwards’ home state of NC 73%/27% among whites.

[Eugene]

Edwards was the VP candidate in 2004. Didn’t help one bit. He and Kerry managed to lose Edwards’ home state of NC 73%/27% among whites.

[SDEngineer]

And as I pointed out, the Democrats don’t NEED the South anymore. You repubs can have it. We’ve made gains in the mountain states, and we own the West coast, New England, and have plenty of strength in the Great Lakes states. Do the math. The Dems don’t need a SINGLE Southern state anymore if they carry Ohio. If they can carry Colorado and New Mexico (which seems increasingly likely), they don’t even need Ohio.

The Southern strategy, by identifying your party with the hard right wing ideologues and the religious nutcases in the deep south has progressively cost your party the New England republicans and the economic conservative Republicans (no, cutting taxes without cutting spending is NOT an economically conservative strategy. Sad to say, supply side economics has been shown to be the economic black hole that knowledgable economists always knew it would be (there’s a reason George Bush Sr. – the last non-loonie Repub in high office – called it “voodoo economics”). But you do play the “fear politics” well. Unfortunately (for you), what most of us now fear is another 4 or 8 years of Republican economic policies.

[SDEngineer]

And as I pointed out, the Democrats don’t NEED the South anymore. You repubs can have it. We’ve made gains in the mountain states, and we own the West coast, New England, and have plenty of strength in the Great Lakes states. Do the math. The Dems don’t need a SINGLE Southern state anymore if they carry Ohio. If they can carry Colorado and New Mexico (which seems increasingly likely), they don’t even need Ohio.

The Southern strategy, by identifying your party with the hard right wing ideologues and the religious nutcases in the deep south has progressively cost your party the New England republicans and the economic conservative Republicans (no, cutting taxes without cutting spending is NOT an economically conservative strategy. Sad to say, supply side economics has been shown to be the economic black hole that knowledgable economists always knew it would be (there’s a reason George Bush Sr. – the last non-loonie Repub in high office – called it “voodoo economics”). But you do play the “fear politics” well. Unfortunately (for you), what most of us now fear is another 4 or 8 years of Republican economic policies.

[SDEngineer]

And as I pointed out, the Democrats don’t NEED the South anymore. You repubs can have it. We’ve made gains in the mountain states, and we own the West coast, New England, and have plenty of strength in the Great Lakes states. Do the math. The Dems don’t need a SINGLE Southern state anymore if they carry Ohio. If they can carry Colorado and New Mexico (which seems increasingly likely), they don’t even need Ohio.

The Southern strategy, by identifying your party with the hard right wing ideologues and the religious nutcases in the deep south has progressively cost your party the New England republicans and the economic conservative Republicans (no, cutting taxes without cutting spending is NOT an economically conservative strategy. Sad to say, supply side economics has been shown to be the economic black hole that knowledgable economists always knew it would be (there’s a reason George Bush Sr. – the last non-loonie Repub in high office – called it “voodoo economics”). But you do play the “fear politics” well. Unfortunately (for you), what most of us now fear is another 4 or 8 years of Republican economic policies.

[SDEngineer]

And as I pointed out, the Democrats don’t NEED the South anymore. You repubs can have it. We’ve made gains in the mountain states, and we own the West coast, New England, and have plenty of strength in the Great Lakes states. Do the math. The Dems don’t need a SINGLE Southern state anymore if they carry Ohio. If they can carry Colorado and New Mexico (which seems increasingly likely), they don’t even need Ohio.

The Southern strategy, by identifying your party with the hard right wing ideologues and the religious nutcases in the deep south has progressively cost your party the New England republicans and the economic conservative Republicans (no, cutting taxes without cutting spending is NOT an economically conservative strategy. Sad to say, supply side economics has been shown to be the economic black hole that knowledgable economists always knew it would be (there’s a reason George Bush Sr. – the last non-loonie Repub in high office – called it “voodoo economics”). But you do play the “fear politics” well. Unfortunately (for you), what most of us now fear is another 4 or 8 years of Republican economic policies.

[SDEngineer]

And as I pointed out, the Democrats don’t NEED the South anymore. You repubs can have it. We’ve made gains in the mountain states, and we own the West coast, New England, and have plenty of strength in the Great Lakes states. Do the math. The Dems don’t need a SINGLE Southern state anymore if they carry Ohio. If they can carry Colorado and New Mexico (which seems increasingly likely), they don’t even need Ohio.

The Southern strategy, by identifying your party with the hard right wing ideologues and the religious nutcases in the deep south has progressively cost your party the New England republicans and the economic conservative Republicans (no, cutting taxes without cutting spending is NOT an economically conservative strategy. Sad to say, supply side economics has been shown to be the economic black hole that knowledgable economists always knew it would be (there’s a reason George Bush Sr. – the last non-loonie Repub in high office – called it “voodoo economics”). But you do play the “fear politics” well. Unfortunately (for you), what most of us now fear is another 4 or 8 years of Republican economic policies.

[Eugene]

esmith…so then the answer is to concede to the racists?!

Unbelievable. Doesn’t matter who will be best for the country. We’ll just let the ignorant, backward people in the south tell us who we should vote for.

It’s time to turn the page.

The answer is to be realistic.

If that’s what it takes to end the war, stop playing world’s policeman, do a comprehensive health care reform, and start working towards equal access to higher education and energy independence, I will concede to every racist I meet.

[Eugene]

esmith…so then the answer is to concede to the racists?!

Unbelievable. Doesn’t matter who will be best for the country. We’ll just let the ignorant, backward people in the south tell us who we should vote for.

It’s time to turn the page.

The answer is to be realistic.

If that’s what it takes to end the war, stop playing world’s policeman, do a comprehensive health care reform, and start working towards equal access to higher education and energy independence, I will concede to every racist I meet.

[Eugene]

esmith…so then the answer is to concede to the racists?!

Unbelievable. Doesn’t matter who will be best for the country. We’ll just let the ignorant, backward people in the south tell us who we should vote for.

It’s time to turn the page.

The answer is to be realistic.

If that’s what it takes to end the war, stop playing world’s policeman, do a comprehensive health care reform, and start working towards equal access to higher education and energy independence, I will concede to every racist I meet.

[Eugene]

esmith…so then the answer is to concede to the racists?!

Unbelievable. Doesn’t matter who will be best for the country. We’ll just let the ignorant, backward people in the south tell us who we should vote for.

It’s time to turn the page.

The answer is to be realistic.

If that’s what it takes to end the war, stop playing world’s policeman, do a comprehensive health care reform, and start working towards equal access to higher education and energy independence, I will concede to every racist I meet.

[Author]

Posts