OT – Whitman Hired Illegal Worker

[briansd1]

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]
For me, the whole issue is a sideshow. I would care less either way.[/quote]

It is an issue because Whitman made it an issue.

Ms. Whitman has taken a hard line on illegal immigration. The allegations came a day after Ms. Whitman said she didn’t support a path to legalization for the millions of undocumented workers during a debate with Mr. Brown, who supports legalizing the workers.

“We do have to hold employers accountable for hiring only documented workers,” Ms. Whitman said at the debate.

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]Here are facts.

[1]Whitman paid $23/hour to the housekeeper – not exactly “treating like garbage”
http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2010/09/29/meg-whitmans-cleaning-lady-is-23-an-hour-exploitive/?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman

[/quote]

But did Whitman pay the agency or the housekeeper directly?

Did Whitman pay all the payroll taxes? Whitman should make payroll reports and filings available.

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]
[2]Whitman used an agency to hire Ms. Diaz Santillan in 2000, and that the agency provided a Social Security card, driver’s license number and a federal document signed by Ms. Diaz Santillan that she was a lawful permanent resident alien.

[/quote]

If Whitman paid the housekeeper directly, hiring through the agency does not absolve Whitman from verifying employment eligibility for her housekeeper.

Is the outsourcing of eligibility verification a good excuse?

Walmart’s janitors were not even its own employees; but Walmart was investigated and fined.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,150846,00.html

[quote=enron_by_the_sea]
[3] The only real issue (if you care) is if Whitman received a letter from the Social Security Administration indicating the Social Security number Ms. Diaz Santillan provided didn’t match her name.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703431604575522301382686356.html?KEYWORDS=meg+whitman

[/quote]

Sounds like Whitman has some explaining to do.

Is a former high tech executive incapable of using e-verify?

http://www.dhs.gov/files/programs/gc_1185221678150.shtm#2

[Zeitgeist]

Rich,

Brian’s trying to start a fight again. He needs to go to his room until he can play nice.

[Zeitgeist]

Rich,

Brian’s trying to start a fight again. He needs to go to his room until he can play nice.

[Zeitgeist]

Rich,

Brian’s trying to start a fight again. He needs to go to his room until he can play nice.

[Zeitgeist]

Rich,

Brian’s trying to start a fight again. He needs to go to his room until he can play nice.

[Zeitgeist]

Rich,

Brian’s trying to start a fight again. He needs to go to his room until he can play nice.

[ucodegen]

[quote briansd1]
Sounds like Whitman has some explaining to do.

Is a former high tech executive incapable of using e-verify?
[/quote]
Brian, you are really scraping the bottom of the barrel here with your comments. The housekeeper was hired in 2000.. before e-verify was implemented(it was only a pilot program at the time). e-verify still is incomplete. Try Sept 2009 for e-verify requirement for fed gov. Whitman let the woman go when she was informed that the housekeeper was using identity theft to supply a SSN (a driver’s license was also supplied as well as a document claiming she was a lawful resident alien – green card holder). – bet you would have claimed hypocrisy on her part if Whitman kept the housekeeper after discovering that she was using a stolen SSN.

E-verify was originally started as a “Basic Pilot Program” in 1997. First federal requirement was 2007.. but was pushed back to 2009 due to slow gov update. As of Jan 2010, even the Social Security Admin failed to perform these tests on 18% of new hires.

—
You know, on a side note, I am getting the impression that briansd1 and BigGovernmentIsGood have the same identity behind them. There is a lot of similarity, including posting/presenting styles. It would be a way of creating a throw-away identity should Rich Toscano decide to implement ‘the edict‘.

It is possible to check using the IP address of the machine taking those logins. This info will be in the web-server’s access logs.

[ucodegen]

[quote briansd1]
Sounds like Whitman has some explaining to do.

Is a former high tech executive incapable of using e-verify?
[/quote]
Brian, you are really scraping the bottom of the barrel here with your comments. The housekeeper was hired in 2000.. before e-verify was implemented(it was only a pilot program at the time). e-verify still is incomplete. Try Sept 2009 for e-verify requirement for fed gov. Whitman let the woman go when she was informed that the housekeeper was using identity theft to supply a SSN (a driver’s license was also supplied as well as a document claiming she was a lawful resident alien – green card holder). – bet you would have claimed hypocrisy on her part if Whitman kept the housekeeper after discovering that she was using a stolen SSN.

E-verify was originally started as a “Basic Pilot Program” in 1997. First federal requirement was 2007.. but was pushed back to 2009 due to slow gov update. As of Jan 2010, even the Social Security Admin failed to perform these tests on 18% of new hires.

—
You know, on a side note, I am getting the impression that briansd1 and BigGovernmentIsGood have the same identity behind them. There is a lot of similarity, including posting/presenting styles. It would be a way of creating a throw-away identity should Rich Toscano decide to implement ‘the edict‘.

It is possible to check using the IP address of the machine taking those logins. This info will be in the web-server’s access logs.

[ucodegen]

[quote briansd1]
Sounds like Whitman has some explaining to do.

Is a former high tech executive incapable of using e-verify?
[/quote]
Brian, you are really scraping the bottom of the barrel here with your comments. The housekeeper was hired in 2000.. before e-verify was implemented(it was only a pilot program at the time). e-verify still is incomplete. Try Sept 2009 for e-verify requirement for fed gov. Whitman let the woman go when she was informed that the housekeeper was using identity theft to supply a SSN (a driver’s license was also supplied as well as a document claiming she was a lawful resident alien – green card holder). – bet you would have claimed hypocrisy on her part if Whitman kept the housekeeper after discovering that she was using a stolen SSN.

E-verify was originally started as a “Basic Pilot Program” in 1997. First federal requirement was 2007.. but was pushed back to 2009 due to slow gov update. As of Jan 2010, even the Social Security Admin failed to perform these tests on 18% of new hires.

—
You know, on a side note, I am getting the impression that briansd1 and BigGovernmentIsGood have the same identity behind them. There is a lot of similarity, including posting/presenting styles. It would be a way of creating a throw-away identity should Rich Toscano decide to implement ‘the edict‘.

It is possible to check using the IP address of the machine taking those logins. This info will be in the web-server’s access logs.

[ucodegen]

[quote briansd1]
Sounds like Whitman has some explaining to do.

Is a former high tech executive incapable of using e-verify?
[/quote]
Brian, you are really scraping the bottom of the barrel here with your comments. The housekeeper was hired in 2000.. before e-verify was implemented(it was only a pilot program at the time). e-verify still is incomplete. Try Sept 2009 for e-verify requirement for fed gov. Whitman let the woman go when she was informed that the housekeeper was using identity theft to supply a SSN (a driver’s license was also supplied as well as a document claiming she was a lawful resident alien – green card holder). – bet you would have claimed hypocrisy on her part if Whitman kept the housekeeper after discovering that she was using a stolen SSN.

E-verify was originally started as a “Basic Pilot Program” in 1997. First federal requirement was 2007.. but was pushed back to 2009 due to slow gov update. As of Jan 2010, even the Social Security Admin failed to perform these tests on 18% of new hires.

—
You know, on a side note, I am getting the impression that briansd1 and BigGovernmentIsGood have the same identity behind them. There is a lot of similarity, including posting/presenting styles. It would be a way of creating a throw-away identity should Rich Toscano decide to implement ‘the edict‘.

It is possible to check using the IP address of the machine taking those logins. This info will be in the web-server’s access logs.

[ucodegen]

[quote briansd1]
Sounds like Whitman has some explaining to do.

Is a former high tech executive incapable of using e-verify?
[/quote]
Brian, you are really scraping the bottom of the barrel here with your comments. The housekeeper was hired in 2000.. before e-verify was implemented(it was only a pilot program at the time). e-verify still is incomplete. Try Sept 2009 for e-verify requirement for fed gov. Whitman let the woman go when she was informed that the housekeeper was using identity theft to supply a SSN (a driver’s license was also supplied as well as a document claiming she was a lawful resident alien – green card holder). – bet you would have claimed hypocrisy on her part if Whitman kept the housekeeper after discovering that she was using a stolen SSN.

E-verify was originally started as a “Basic Pilot Program” in 1997. First federal requirement was 2007.. but was pushed back to 2009 due to slow gov update. As of Jan 2010, even the Social Security Admin failed to perform these tests on 18% of new hires.

—
You know, on a side note, I am getting the impression that briansd1 and BigGovernmentIsGood have the same identity behind them. There is a lot of similarity, including posting/presenting styles. It would be a way of creating a throw-away identity should Rich Toscano decide to implement ‘the edict‘.

It is possible to check using the IP address of the machine taking those logins. This info will be in the web-server’s access logs.

[Aecetia]

Nice detective work uco.

[Aecetia]

Nice detective work uco.

[Aecetia]

Nice detective work uco.

[Aecetia]

Nice detective work uco.

[Author]

Posts