- This topic has 1,770 replies, 36 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by
GH.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 14, 2010 at 9:45 AM #618986October 14, 2010 at 3:25 PM #618159
teaboy
ParticipantCity Councilman Carl DeMaio, one of Prop. D’s main antagonists, unveiled a report showing nearly all city firefighters receive extra pay above their salaries for having emergency medical certifications. Firefighters now have such certifications just to get their jobs, and virtually all firefighters hold them.
Why, DeMaio asked, should firefighters receive more money just for doing their jobs?
“This would be like opening up the newspaper or going on Craigslist for a help-wanted ad and it says law firm seeks lawyer,” DeMaio said. “Attractive compensation package. And if you have a law degree a bonus is provided.”
The extra pay cost the city $5.4 million this year. DeMaio argued it should be eliminated, or at the least subsidize firefighter overtime costs so the city can restore some rotating fire engine closures, known as brownouts. Since the $11.5 million saved annually by closing engines comes from reducing firefighter overtime, money to restore the engines would go directly to firefighters.
But DeMaio went further than that. He called the practice “a hidden bonus” and a “dubious, unjustified payment.”
Cutting the extra payment would be equivalent to giving firefighters an 8.5 percent pay cut.
_________________
..I pity the fool politician who tries to argue against any public department or union about their benefits. Maybe we should put something like this as a ballot proposition and let the public decide.
tb
October 14, 2010 at 3:25 PM #618245teaboy
ParticipantCity Councilman Carl DeMaio, one of Prop. D’s main antagonists, unveiled a report showing nearly all city firefighters receive extra pay above their salaries for having emergency medical certifications. Firefighters now have such certifications just to get their jobs, and virtually all firefighters hold them.
Why, DeMaio asked, should firefighters receive more money just for doing their jobs?
“This would be like opening up the newspaper or going on Craigslist for a help-wanted ad and it says law firm seeks lawyer,” DeMaio said. “Attractive compensation package. And if you have a law degree a bonus is provided.”
The extra pay cost the city $5.4 million this year. DeMaio argued it should be eliminated, or at the least subsidize firefighter overtime costs so the city can restore some rotating fire engine closures, known as brownouts. Since the $11.5 million saved annually by closing engines comes from reducing firefighter overtime, money to restore the engines would go directly to firefighters.
But DeMaio went further than that. He called the practice “a hidden bonus” and a “dubious, unjustified payment.”
Cutting the extra payment would be equivalent to giving firefighters an 8.5 percent pay cut.
_________________
..I pity the fool politician who tries to argue against any public department or union about their benefits. Maybe we should put something like this as a ballot proposition and let the public decide.
tb
October 14, 2010 at 3:25 PM #618795teaboy
ParticipantCity Councilman Carl DeMaio, one of Prop. D’s main antagonists, unveiled a report showing nearly all city firefighters receive extra pay above their salaries for having emergency medical certifications. Firefighters now have such certifications just to get their jobs, and virtually all firefighters hold them.
Why, DeMaio asked, should firefighters receive more money just for doing their jobs?
“This would be like opening up the newspaper or going on Craigslist for a help-wanted ad and it says law firm seeks lawyer,” DeMaio said. “Attractive compensation package. And if you have a law degree a bonus is provided.”
The extra pay cost the city $5.4 million this year. DeMaio argued it should be eliminated, or at the least subsidize firefighter overtime costs so the city can restore some rotating fire engine closures, known as brownouts. Since the $11.5 million saved annually by closing engines comes from reducing firefighter overtime, money to restore the engines would go directly to firefighters.
But DeMaio went further than that. He called the practice “a hidden bonus” and a “dubious, unjustified payment.”
Cutting the extra payment would be equivalent to giving firefighters an 8.5 percent pay cut.
_________________
..I pity the fool politician who tries to argue against any public department or union about their benefits. Maybe we should put something like this as a ballot proposition and let the public decide.
tb
October 14, 2010 at 3:25 PM #618915teaboy
ParticipantCity Councilman Carl DeMaio, one of Prop. D’s main antagonists, unveiled a report showing nearly all city firefighters receive extra pay above their salaries for having emergency medical certifications. Firefighters now have such certifications just to get their jobs, and virtually all firefighters hold them.
Why, DeMaio asked, should firefighters receive more money just for doing their jobs?
“This would be like opening up the newspaper or going on Craigslist for a help-wanted ad and it says law firm seeks lawyer,” DeMaio said. “Attractive compensation package. And if you have a law degree a bonus is provided.”
The extra pay cost the city $5.4 million this year. DeMaio argued it should be eliminated, or at the least subsidize firefighter overtime costs so the city can restore some rotating fire engine closures, known as brownouts. Since the $11.5 million saved annually by closing engines comes from reducing firefighter overtime, money to restore the engines would go directly to firefighters.
But DeMaio went further than that. He called the practice “a hidden bonus” and a “dubious, unjustified payment.”
Cutting the extra payment would be equivalent to giving firefighters an 8.5 percent pay cut.
_________________
..I pity the fool politician who tries to argue against any public department or union about their benefits. Maybe we should put something like this as a ballot proposition and let the public decide.
tb
October 14, 2010 at 3:25 PM #619231teaboy
ParticipantCity Councilman Carl DeMaio, one of Prop. D’s main antagonists, unveiled a report showing nearly all city firefighters receive extra pay above their salaries for having emergency medical certifications. Firefighters now have such certifications just to get their jobs, and virtually all firefighters hold them.
Why, DeMaio asked, should firefighters receive more money just for doing their jobs?
“This would be like opening up the newspaper or going on Craigslist for a help-wanted ad and it says law firm seeks lawyer,” DeMaio said. “Attractive compensation package. And if you have a law degree a bonus is provided.”
The extra pay cost the city $5.4 million this year. DeMaio argued it should be eliminated, or at the least subsidize firefighter overtime costs so the city can restore some rotating fire engine closures, known as brownouts. Since the $11.5 million saved annually by closing engines comes from reducing firefighter overtime, money to restore the engines would go directly to firefighters.
But DeMaio went further than that. He called the practice “a hidden bonus” and a “dubious, unjustified payment.”
Cutting the extra payment would be equivalent to giving firefighters an 8.5 percent pay cut.
_________________
..I pity the fool politician who tries to argue against any public department or union about their benefits. Maybe we should put something like this as a ballot proposition and let the public decide.
tb
October 14, 2010 at 3:34 PM #618169sdrealtor
ParticipantI’ll bet it is just the tip of the iceberg
October 14, 2010 at 3:34 PM #618255sdrealtor
ParticipantI’ll bet it is just the tip of the iceberg
October 14, 2010 at 3:34 PM #618805sdrealtor
ParticipantI’ll bet it is just the tip of the iceberg
October 14, 2010 at 3:34 PM #618925sdrealtor
ParticipantI’ll bet it is just the tip of the iceberg
October 14, 2010 at 3:34 PM #619241sdrealtor
ParticipantI’ll bet it is just the tip of the iceberg
October 14, 2010 at 3:41 PM #618179jpinpb
ParticipantI know a family law specialist attorney that b/c of his specialized certification gets more money than the average family law attorney.
Edit: It was negotiated with the firefighters’ union in the 80s when EMT services were added to firefighter duties. The chief said it’s part of their basic pay even though it’s a separate budget line item.
DeMaio is using this for exposure. He is inaccurate and he knows it.
October 14, 2010 at 3:41 PM #618265jpinpb
ParticipantI know a family law specialist attorney that b/c of his specialized certification gets more money than the average family law attorney.
Edit: It was negotiated with the firefighters’ union in the 80s when EMT services were added to firefighter duties. The chief said it’s part of their basic pay even though it’s a separate budget line item.
DeMaio is using this for exposure. He is inaccurate and he knows it.
October 14, 2010 at 3:41 PM #618815jpinpb
ParticipantI know a family law specialist attorney that b/c of his specialized certification gets more money than the average family law attorney.
Edit: It was negotiated with the firefighters’ union in the 80s when EMT services were added to firefighter duties. The chief said it’s part of their basic pay even though it’s a separate budget line item.
DeMaio is using this for exposure. He is inaccurate and he knows it.
October 14, 2010 at 3:41 PM #618935jpinpb
ParticipantI know a family law specialist attorney that b/c of his specialized certification gets more money than the average family law attorney.
Edit: It was negotiated with the firefighters’ union in the 80s when EMT services were added to firefighter duties. The chief said it’s part of their basic pay even though it’s a separate budget line item.
DeMaio is using this for exposure. He is inaccurate and he knows it.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
