- This topic has 220 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 2, 2009 at 2:32 PM #14958February 2, 2009 at 2:51 PM #339992LarryTheRenterParticipant
Daschle’s wife is a big time lobbyist…Whenever a poiliticians wife is set up as a lobbyist or given a plum seat on some board of directors – it is nothing more than a “soft bribe”…The recently impeached Illinois governor was just blatant about it when he said “I got this f__ valuable thing and I am not gonna just give it away”…
February 2, 2009 at 2:51 PM #340317LarryTheRenterParticipantDaschle’s wife is a big time lobbyist…Whenever a poiliticians wife is set up as a lobbyist or given a plum seat on some board of directors – it is nothing more than a “soft bribe”…The recently impeached Illinois governor was just blatant about it when he said “I got this f__ valuable thing and I am not gonna just give it away”…
February 2, 2009 at 2:51 PM #340414LarryTheRenterParticipantDaschle’s wife is a big time lobbyist…Whenever a poiliticians wife is set up as a lobbyist or given a plum seat on some board of directors – it is nothing more than a “soft bribe”…The recently impeached Illinois governor was just blatant about it when he said “I got this f__ valuable thing and I am not gonna just give it away”…
February 2, 2009 at 2:51 PM #340442LarryTheRenterParticipantDaschle’s wife is a big time lobbyist…Whenever a poiliticians wife is set up as a lobbyist or given a plum seat on some board of directors – it is nothing more than a “soft bribe”…The recently impeached Illinois governor was just blatant about it when he said “I got this f__ valuable thing and I am not gonna just give it away”…
February 2, 2009 at 2:51 PM #340535LarryTheRenterParticipantDaschle’s wife is a big time lobbyist…Whenever a poiliticians wife is set up as a lobbyist or given a plum seat on some board of directors – it is nothing more than a “soft bribe”…The recently impeached Illinois governor was just blatant about it when he said “I got this f__ valuable thing and I am not gonna just give it away”…
February 2, 2009 at 3:13 PM #340017crParticipantDon’t forget Hillary…
Clinton Gets Most Lobbyist Money.
This is from a year ago and she certainly has less pull as Sec of State, but I doubt those “undisclosed contributors” care what her title is.
February 2, 2009 at 3:13 PM #340342crParticipantDon’t forget Hillary…
Clinton Gets Most Lobbyist Money.
This is from a year ago and she certainly has less pull as Sec of State, but I doubt those “undisclosed contributors” care what her title is.
February 2, 2009 at 3:13 PM #340439crParticipantDon’t forget Hillary…
Clinton Gets Most Lobbyist Money.
This is from a year ago and she certainly has less pull as Sec of State, but I doubt those “undisclosed contributors” care what her title is.
February 2, 2009 at 3:13 PM #340467crParticipantDon’t forget Hillary…
Clinton Gets Most Lobbyist Money.
This is from a year ago and she certainly has less pull as Sec of State, but I doubt those “undisclosed contributors” care what her title is.
February 2, 2009 at 3:13 PM #340560crParticipantDon’t forget Hillary…
Clinton Gets Most Lobbyist Money.
This is from a year ago and she certainly has less pull as Sec of State, but I doubt those “undisclosed contributors” care what her title is.
February 2, 2009 at 3:21 PM #340027Ex-SDParticipantIt will be interesting to watch the reaction of the people who thought that Obama was the resurrection of “The Camelot Days” as Obama continues to break more of his campaign promises.
I’m not saying that McCain (or any of the other candidates) would have been any better but when you have a man like Obama whom so many so-called news journalists and t.v. talking heads swooned over and gave him a free pass while not treating all the other candidates in a similar fashion who is breaking his own rules and promises less than a month into his Presidency…………..I just wonder how many of these same people (along with the people who crossed party lines with their votes and helped to put Obama in the White House) will think he’s so wonderful if he keeps up this blatant, two-faced hypocrisy?February 2, 2009 at 3:21 PM #340352Ex-SDParticipantIt will be interesting to watch the reaction of the people who thought that Obama was the resurrection of “The Camelot Days” as Obama continues to break more of his campaign promises.
I’m not saying that McCain (or any of the other candidates) would have been any better but when you have a man like Obama whom so many so-called news journalists and t.v. talking heads swooned over and gave him a free pass while not treating all the other candidates in a similar fashion who is breaking his own rules and promises less than a month into his Presidency…………..I just wonder how many of these same people (along with the people who crossed party lines with their votes and helped to put Obama in the White House) will think he’s so wonderful if he keeps up this blatant, two-faced hypocrisy?February 2, 2009 at 3:21 PM #340449Ex-SDParticipantIt will be interesting to watch the reaction of the people who thought that Obama was the resurrection of “The Camelot Days” as Obama continues to break more of his campaign promises.
I’m not saying that McCain (or any of the other candidates) would have been any better but when you have a man like Obama whom so many so-called news journalists and t.v. talking heads swooned over and gave him a free pass while not treating all the other candidates in a similar fashion who is breaking his own rules and promises less than a month into his Presidency…………..I just wonder how many of these same people (along with the people who crossed party lines with their votes and helped to put Obama in the White House) will think he’s so wonderful if he keeps up this blatant, two-faced hypocrisy?February 2, 2009 at 3:21 PM #340477Ex-SDParticipantIt will be interesting to watch the reaction of the people who thought that Obama was the resurrection of “The Camelot Days” as Obama continues to break more of his campaign promises.
I’m not saying that McCain (or any of the other candidates) would have been any better but when you have a man like Obama whom so many so-called news journalists and t.v. talking heads swooned over and gave him a free pass while not treating all the other candidates in a similar fashion who is breaking his own rules and promises less than a month into his Presidency…………..I just wonder how many of these same people (along with the people who crossed party lines with their votes and helped to put Obama in the White House) will think he’s so wonderful if he keeps up this blatant, two-faced hypocrisy? -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.