- This topic has 195 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by Ash Housewares.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 30, 2009 at 8:43 PM #375446March 30, 2009 at 9:05 PM #374832no_such_realityParticipant
The market reacted badly because the late rejection and kneejerk action on Wagoner is basically bankruptcy with management decision performed by public polling.
The administration has also telegraphed that they will basically interfere with tradition bankruptcy reorganization.
March 30, 2009 at 9:05 PM #375113no_such_realityParticipantThe market reacted badly because the late rejection and kneejerk action on Wagoner is basically bankruptcy with management decision performed by public polling.
The administration has also telegraphed that they will basically interfere with tradition bankruptcy reorganization.
March 30, 2009 at 9:05 PM #375292no_such_realityParticipantThe market reacted badly because the late rejection and kneejerk action on Wagoner is basically bankruptcy with management decision performed by public polling.
The administration has also telegraphed that they will basically interfere with tradition bankruptcy reorganization.
March 30, 2009 at 9:05 PM #375335no_such_realityParticipantThe market reacted badly because the late rejection and kneejerk action on Wagoner is basically bankruptcy with management decision performed by public polling.
The administration has also telegraphed that they will basically interfere with tradition bankruptcy reorganization.
March 30, 2009 at 9:05 PM #375457no_such_realityParticipantThe market reacted badly because the late rejection and kneejerk action on Wagoner is basically bankruptcy with management decision performed by public polling.
The administration has also telegraphed that they will basically interfere with tradition bankruptcy reorganization.
March 30, 2009 at 10:06 PM #374847SD RealtorParticipantafx what I want him to say is that the government will take a hands off policy and let GM figure out what to do on its own. No aid, no tarp money, no bailout, no government running the company. Government can barely run itself.
I want him to let the company reorganize, sell of assets, and let all the creditors, bond holders, labor unions, and everyone else involved to use the infrastructure we have to move forward. This is what bankruptcy is for and this is CLEARLY a case where a company CANNOT compete.
Yes I hear the painful concessions but what scares me more is what I did not hear. I did not hear him say that no tax money will be sent to the labor unions.
So what I want him to say is that NO TAXPAYERS MONEY will be sent to GM, will be sent to gm creditors, shareholders, bond holders, or labor unions. That is what I want him to say.
March 30, 2009 at 10:06 PM #375128SD RealtorParticipantafx what I want him to say is that the government will take a hands off policy and let GM figure out what to do on its own. No aid, no tarp money, no bailout, no government running the company. Government can barely run itself.
I want him to let the company reorganize, sell of assets, and let all the creditors, bond holders, labor unions, and everyone else involved to use the infrastructure we have to move forward. This is what bankruptcy is for and this is CLEARLY a case where a company CANNOT compete.
Yes I hear the painful concessions but what scares me more is what I did not hear. I did not hear him say that no tax money will be sent to the labor unions.
So what I want him to say is that NO TAXPAYERS MONEY will be sent to GM, will be sent to gm creditors, shareholders, bond holders, or labor unions. That is what I want him to say.
March 30, 2009 at 10:06 PM #375307SD RealtorParticipantafx what I want him to say is that the government will take a hands off policy and let GM figure out what to do on its own. No aid, no tarp money, no bailout, no government running the company. Government can barely run itself.
I want him to let the company reorganize, sell of assets, and let all the creditors, bond holders, labor unions, and everyone else involved to use the infrastructure we have to move forward. This is what bankruptcy is for and this is CLEARLY a case where a company CANNOT compete.
Yes I hear the painful concessions but what scares me more is what I did not hear. I did not hear him say that no tax money will be sent to the labor unions.
So what I want him to say is that NO TAXPAYERS MONEY will be sent to GM, will be sent to gm creditors, shareholders, bond holders, or labor unions. That is what I want him to say.
March 30, 2009 at 10:06 PM #375350SD RealtorParticipantafx what I want him to say is that the government will take a hands off policy and let GM figure out what to do on its own. No aid, no tarp money, no bailout, no government running the company. Government can barely run itself.
I want him to let the company reorganize, sell of assets, and let all the creditors, bond holders, labor unions, and everyone else involved to use the infrastructure we have to move forward. This is what bankruptcy is for and this is CLEARLY a case where a company CANNOT compete.
Yes I hear the painful concessions but what scares me more is what I did not hear. I did not hear him say that no tax money will be sent to the labor unions.
So what I want him to say is that NO TAXPAYERS MONEY will be sent to GM, will be sent to gm creditors, shareholders, bond holders, or labor unions. That is what I want him to say.
March 30, 2009 at 10:06 PM #375472SD RealtorParticipantafx what I want him to say is that the government will take a hands off policy and let GM figure out what to do on its own. No aid, no tarp money, no bailout, no government running the company. Government can barely run itself.
I want him to let the company reorganize, sell of assets, and let all the creditors, bond holders, labor unions, and everyone else involved to use the infrastructure we have to move forward. This is what bankruptcy is for and this is CLEARLY a case where a company CANNOT compete.
Yes I hear the painful concessions but what scares me more is what I did not hear. I did not hear him say that no tax money will be sent to the labor unions.
So what I want him to say is that NO TAXPAYERS MONEY will be sent to GM, will be sent to gm creditors, shareholders, bond holders, or labor unions. That is what I want him to say.
March 31, 2009 at 6:43 AM #374902CoronitaParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]FLU I need to retract my approval of this move by OB… it is pending further review. In essence I was hoping that OB was forcing all parties involved, (especially labor) to give in and concede to the fact that they were essentially strangling the company. After listening to the exact way OB worded things in his speech today I no longer think that is the case. I think that in some bizarre way he is wanted a reorg of the company and that the burden of the reorg will be somewhat selective.
I think we will coin a new term called Barrackruptcy. So Barrack gets to pick and choose who gets wiped out.
Like I said, pending further review.
[/quote]
Diego M posted this picture a few days ago. I thought it was hysterical.So funny, yet so sad at the same time.
March 31, 2009 at 6:43 AM #375183CoronitaParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]FLU I need to retract my approval of this move by OB… it is pending further review. In essence I was hoping that OB was forcing all parties involved, (especially labor) to give in and concede to the fact that they were essentially strangling the company. After listening to the exact way OB worded things in his speech today I no longer think that is the case. I think that in some bizarre way he is wanted a reorg of the company and that the burden of the reorg will be somewhat selective.
I think we will coin a new term called Barrackruptcy. So Barrack gets to pick and choose who gets wiped out.
Like I said, pending further review.
[/quote]
Diego M posted this picture a few days ago. I thought it was hysterical.So funny, yet so sad at the same time.
March 31, 2009 at 6:43 AM #375362CoronitaParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]FLU I need to retract my approval of this move by OB… it is pending further review. In essence I was hoping that OB was forcing all parties involved, (especially labor) to give in and concede to the fact that they were essentially strangling the company. After listening to the exact way OB worded things in his speech today I no longer think that is the case. I think that in some bizarre way he is wanted a reorg of the company and that the burden of the reorg will be somewhat selective.
I think we will coin a new term called Barrackruptcy. So Barrack gets to pick and choose who gets wiped out.
Like I said, pending further review.
[/quote]
Diego M posted this picture a few days ago. I thought it was hysterical.So funny, yet so sad at the same time.
March 31, 2009 at 6:43 AM #375405CoronitaParticipant[quote=SD Realtor]FLU I need to retract my approval of this move by OB… it is pending further review. In essence I was hoping that OB was forcing all parties involved, (especially labor) to give in and concede to the fact that they were essentially strangling the company. After listening to the exact way OB worded things in his speech today I no longer think that is the case. I think that in some bizarre way he is wanted a reorg of the company and that the burden of the reorg will be somewhat selective.
I think we will coin a new term called Barrackruptcy. So Barrack gets to pick and choose who gets wiped out.
Like I said, pending further review.
[/quote]
Diego M posted this picture a few days ago. I thought it was hysterical.So funny, yet so sad at the same time.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.