- This topic has 340 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by PadreBrian.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 15, 2009 at 12:20 PM #431399July 15, 2009 at 12:34 PM #430684CascaParticipant
Thanks for your legal opinion SD. It doesn’t help his case much that there is a FOIA response floating around from Occidental that says he took money from the Fulbright Foundation as an Indonesian foreign student. No conspiracy theory here, just one hell of a lot of smoke. That leads some of us to suspect fire. You go ahead and go back to sleep.
July 15, 2009 at 12:34 PM #430900CascaParticipantThanks for your legal opinion SD. It doesn’t help his case much that there is a FOIA response floating around from Occidental that says he took money from the Fulbright Foundation as an Indonesian foreign student. No conspiracy theory here, just one hell of a lot of smoke. That leads some of us to suspect fire. You go ahead and go back to sleep.
July 15, 2009 at 12:34 PM #431193CascaParticipantThanks for your legal opinion SD. It doesn’t help his case much that there is a FOIA response floating around from Occidental that says he took money from the Fulbright Foundation as an Indonesian foreign student. No conspiracy theory here, just one hell of a lot of smoke. That leads some of us to suspect fire. You go ahead and go back to sleep.
July 15, 2009 at 12:34 PM #431264CascaParticipantThanks for your legal opinion SD. It doesn’t help his case much that there is a FOIA response floating around from Occidental that says he took money from the Fulbright Foundation as an Indonesian foreign student. No conspiracy theory here, just one hell of a lot of smoke. That leads some of us to suspect fire. You go ahead and go back to sleep.
July 15, 2009 at 12:34 PM #431423CascaParticipantThanks for your legal opinion SD. It doesn’t help his case much that there is a FOIA response floating around from Occidental that says he took money from the Fulbright Foundation as an Indonesian foreign student. No conspiracy theory here, just one hell of a lot of smoke. That leads some of us to suspect fire. You go ahead and go back to sleep.
July 15, 2009 at 12:51 PM #430717AnonymousGuestThe Supreme Court took up the issue and upheld the lower courts which, of course said, in essence,”you gotta be kidding.”
An interesting legal issue: who has standing to challenge the qualifications for President? A: Congress does, when it certifies the votes of the electors. If there were any substantive issue it legally needed to be raised then.
A military officer doesn’t have standing. Can you imagine if it were otherwise? Any officer could challenge orders on grounds that “general XYZ wasn’t properly commissioned and didn’t sign the form in the right place blah blah blah”.
July 15, 2009 at 12:51 PM #430934AnonymousGuestThe Supreme Court took up the issue and upheld the lower courts which, of course said, in essence,”you gotta be kidding.”
An interesting legal issue: who has standing to challenge the qualifications for President? A: Congress does, when it certifies the votes of the electors. If there were any substantive issue it legally needed to be raised then.
A military officer doesn’t have standing. Can you imagine if it were otherwise? Any officer could challenge orders on grounds that “general XYZ wasn’t properly commissioned and didn’t sign the form in the right place blah blah blah”.
July 15, 2009 at 12:51 PM #431227AnonymousGuestThe Supreme Court took up the issue and upheld the lower courts which, of course said, in essence,”you gotta be kidding.”
An interesting legal issue: who has standing to challenge the qualifications for President? A: Congress does, when it certifies the votes of the electors. If there were any substantive issue it legally needed to be raised then.
A military officer doesn’t have standing. Can you imagine if it were otherwise? Any officer could challenge orders on grounds that “general XYZ wasn’t properly commissioned and didn’t sign the form in the right place blah blah blah”.
July 15, 2009 at 12:51 PM #431300AnonymousGuestThe Supreme Court took up the issue and upheld the lower courts which, of course said, in essence,”you gotta be kidding.”
An interesting legal issue: who has standing to challenge the qualifications for President? A: Congress does, when it certifies the votes of the electors. If there were any substantive issue it legally needed to be raised then.
A military officer doesn’t have standing. Can you imagine if it were otherwise? Any officer could challenge orders on grounds that “general XYZ wasn’t properly commissioned and didn’t sign the form in the right place blah blah blah”.
July 15, 2009 at 12:51 PM #431456AnonymousGuestThe Supreme Court took up the issue and upheld the lower courts which, of course said, in essence,”you gotta be kidding.”
An interesting legal issue: who has standing to challenge the qualifications for President? A: Congress does, when it certifies the votes of the electors. If there were any substantive issue it legally needed to be raised then.
A military officer doesn’t have standing. Can you imagine if it were otherwise? Any officer could challenge orders on grounds that “general XYZ wasn’t properly commissioned and didn’t sign the form in the right place blah blah blah”.
July 15, 2009 at 12:58 PM #430704SDEngineerParticipant[quote=Casca]Thanks for your legal opinion SD. It doesn’t help his case much that there is a FOIA response floating around from Occidental that says he took money from the Fulbright Foundation as an Indonesian foreign student. No conspiracy theory here, just one hell of a lot of smoke. That leads some of us to suspect fire. You go ahead and go back to sleep.[/quote]
Citation and source?
Hard to vet information when I’m not provided any relevent facts.
Meanwhile, you can go ahead and replace tinfoil cap. Make sure it’s not on too tight.
BTW, mountains and molehills look very similar – as long as you’re not paying much attention to the perspective.
Edited to add:
Hmm, snopes seems to address this as well.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/occidental.asp
It appears, unless you can actually produce the FOIA response in question (a link to it would be sufficient), that this is solely based on yet another spammail attempting to appear to be a legitimate news story (though the tagline on the supposed AP story which appears to have given rise to this should be a clue, since it’s dated April 1, 2009).
July 15, 2009 at 12:58 PM #430920SDEngineerParticipant[quote=Casca]Thanks for your legal opinion SD. It doesn’t help his case much that there is a FOIA response floating around from Occidental that says he took money from the Fulbright Foundation as an Indonesian foreign student. No conspiracy theory here, just one hell of a lot of smoke. That leads some of us to suspect fire. You go ahead and go back to sleep.[/quote]
Citation and source?
Hard to vet information when I’m not provided any relevent facts.
Meanwhile, you can go ahead and replace tinfoil cap. Make sure it’s not on too tight.
BTW, mountains and molehills look very similar – as long as you’re not paying much attention to the perspective.
Edited to add:
Hmm, snopes seems to address this as well.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/occidental.asp
It appears, unless you can actually produce the FOIA response in question (a link to it would be sufficient), that this is solely based on yet another spammail attempting to appear to be a legitimate news story (though the tagline on the supposed AP story which appears to have given rise to this should be a clue, since it’s dated April 1, 2009).
July 15, 2009 at 12:58 PM #431213SDEngineerParticipant[quote=Casca]Thanks for your legal opinion SD. It doesn’t help his case much that there is a FOIA response floating around from Occidental that says he took money from the Fulbright Foundation as an Indonesian foreign student. No conspiracy theory here, just one hell of a lot of smoke. That leads some of us to suspect fire. You go ahead and go back to sleep.[/quote]
Citation and source?
Hard to vet information when I’m not provided any relevent facts.
Meanwhile, you can go ahead and replace tinfoil cap. Make sure it’s not on too tight.
BTW, mountains and molehills look very similar – as long as you’re not paying much attention to the perspective.
Edited to add:
Hmm, snopes seems to address this as well.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/occidental.asp
It appears, unless you can actually produce the FOIA response in question (a link to it would be sufficient), that this is solely based on yet another spammail attempting to appear to be a legitimate news story (though the tagline on the supposed AP story which appears to have given rise to this should be a clue, since it’s dated April 1, 2009).
July 15, 2009 at 12:58 PM #431284SDEngineerParticipant[quote=Casca]Thanks for your legal opinion SD. It doesn’t help his case much that there is a FOIA response floating around from Occidental that says he took money from the Fulbright Foundation as an Indonesian foreign student. No conspiracy theory here, just one hell of a lot of smoke. That leads some of us to suspect fire. You go ahead and go back to sleep.[/quote]
Citation and source?
Hard to vet information when I’m not provided any relevent facts.
Meanwhile, you can go ahead and replace tinfoil cap. Make sure it’s not on too tight.
BTW, mountains and molehills look very similar – as long as you’re not paying much attention to the perspective.
Edited to add:
Hmm, snopes seems to address this as well.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/occidental.asp
It appears, unless you can actually produce the FOIA response in question (a link to it would be sufficient), that this is solely based on yet another spammail attempting to appear to be a legitimate news story (though the tagline on the supposed AP story which appears to have given rise to this should be a clue, since it’s dated April 1, 2009).
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.