OT: McCain Victory No Longer Unikely

[Aecetia]

duplicate

[jficquette]

Esmith,

In the stock market the majority is always proven wrong eventually. The stock market will go where the most pain is.

Trading is trading. As you know the majority of those Traders betting on Obama are in the majority or else the odds would be different.

John

[jficquette]

Esmith,

In the stock market the majority is always proven wrong eventually. The stock market will go where the most pain is.

Trading is trading. As you know the majority of those Traders betting on Obama are in the majority or else the odds would be different.

John

[jficquette]

Esmith,

In the stock market the majority is always proven wrong eventually. The stock market will go where the most pain is.

Trading is trading. As you know the majority of those Traders betting on Obama are in the majority or else the odds would be different.

John

[jficquette]

Esmith,

In the stock market the majority is always proven wrong eventually. The stock market will go where the most pain is.

Trading is trading. As you know the majority of those Traders betting on Obama are in the majority or else the odds would be different.

John

[jficquette]

Esmith,

In the stock market the majority is always proven wrong eventually. The stock market will go where the most pain is.

Trading is trading. As you know the majority of those Traders betting on Obama are in the majority or else the odds would be different.

John

[Eugene]

This is a great chance for you to show those traders how wrong they are, and make some money in the process.

http://www.intrade.com/

A bet of $11.1 on McCain pays $100 if he wins.

I was thinking to offer you a bet, but I can’t give you such favorable odds.

[Eugene]

This is a great chance for you to show those traders how wrong they are, and make some money in the process.

http://www.intrade.com/

A bet of $11.1 on McCain pays $100 if he wins.

I was thinking to offer you a bet, but I can’t give you such favorable odds.

[Eugene]

This is a great chance for you to show those traders how wrong they are, and make some money in the process.

http://www.intrade.com/

A bet of $11.1 on McCain pays $100 if he wins.

I was thinking to offer you a bet, but I can’t give you such favorable odds.

[Eugene]

This is a great chance for you to show those traders how wrong they are, and make some money in the process.

http://www.intrade.com/

A bet of $11.1 on McCain pays $100 if he wins.

I was thinking to offer you a bet, but I can’t give you such favorable odds.

[Eugene]

This is a great chance for you to show those traders how wrong they are, and make some money in the process.

http://www.intrade.com/

A bet of $11.1 on McCain pays $100 if he wins.

I was thinking to offer you a bet, but I can’t give you such favorable odds.

[jficquette]

I may do it. That sounds like easy money since once the majority considers that they are on the on the wrong side they are sure to come down.

Its like when the majority was on the side of housing, or when every one was buying fertilzer stocks or when every one was buying dot.coms. They all got screwed.

They all got screwed because they were going with the crowd and overlooked fundementals.

In this case the fundementals are that Obama is a Racist, and a Marxist. Where is the value in that in a free society? No where, just like fertilizer stocks never should have gotten 30 times earnings etc but did because people saw them going up and jumped in. Same with housing. No reason for stuff to get as high as it did but it did.

John

[jficquette]

I may do it. That sounds like easy money since once the majority considers that they are on the on the wrong side they are sure to come down.

Its like when the majority was on the side of housing, or when every one was buying fertilzer stocks or when every one was buying dot.coms. They all got screwed.

They all got screwed because they were going with the crowd and overlooked fundementals.

In this case the fundementals are that Obama is a Racist, and a Marxist. Where is the value in that in a free society? No where, just like fertilizer stocks never should have gotten 30 times earnings etc but did because people saw them going up and jumped in. Same with housing. No reason for stuff to get as high as it did but it did.

John

[jficquette]

I may do it. That sounds like easy money since once the majority considers that they are on the on the wrong side they are sure to come down.

Its like when the majority was on the side of housing, or when every one was buying fertilzer stocks or when every one was buying dot.coms. They all got screwed.

They all got screwed because they were going with the crowd and overlooked fundementals.

In this case the fundementals are that Obama is a Racist, and a Marxist. Where is the value in that in a free society? No where, just like fertilizer stocks never should have gotten 30 times earnings etc but did because people saw them going up and jumped in. Same with housing. No reason for stuff to get as high as it did but it did.

John

[jficquette]

I may do it. That sounds like easy money since once the majority considers that they are on the on the wrong side they are sure to come down.

Its like when the majority was on the side of housing, or when every one was buying fertilzer stocks or when every one was buying dot.coms. They all got screwed.

They all got screwed because they were going with the crowd and overlooked fundementals.

In this case the fundementals are that Obama is a Racist, and a Marxist. Where is the value in that in a free society? No where, just like fertilizer stocks never should have gotten 30 times earnings etc but did because people saw them going up and jumped in. Same with housing. No reason for stuff to get as high as it did but it did.

John

[Author]

Posts