- This topic has 55 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 3 months ago by
Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 29, 2009 at 10:48 AM #16728November 29, 2009 at 11:03 AM #487868
meadandale
ParticipantThat’s great. I think we should do the same thing in Sacramento.
I don’t have kids in school or college, don’t get public assistance (healthcare or welfare), don’t work for the state and don’t know anyone in prison. That means that I’m being disenfranchised as a tax paying resident; the bulk of state taxes pay for the above things which I derive no direct benefit from.
November 29, 2009 at 11:03 AM #488414meadandale
ParticipantThat’s great. I think we should do the same thing in Sacramento.
I don’t have kids in school or college, don’t get public assistance (healthcare or welfare), don’t work for the state and don’t know anyone in prison. That means that I’m being disenfranchised as a tax paying resident; the bulk of state taxes pay for the above things which I derive no direct benefit from.
November 29, 2009 at 11:03 AM #488502meadandale
ParticipantThat’s great. I think we should do the same thing in Sacramento.
I don’t have kids in school or college, don’t get public assistance (healthcare or welfare), don’t work for the state and don’t know anyone in prison. That means that I’m being disenfranchised as a tax paying resident; the bulk of state taxes pay for the above things which I derive no direct benefit from.
November 29, 2009 at 11:03 AM #488734meadandale
ParticipantThat’s great. I think we should do the same thing in Sacramento.
I don’t have kids in school or college, don’t get public assistance (healthcare or welfare), don’t work for the state and don’t know anyone in prison. That means that I’m being disenfranchised as a tax paying resident; the bulk of state taxes pay for the above things which I derive no direct benefit from.
November 29, 2009 at 11:03 AM #488034meadandale
ParticipantThat’s great. I think we should do the same thing in Sacramento.
I don’t have kids in school or college, don’t get public assistance (healthcare or welfare), don’t work for the state and don’t know anyone in prison. That means that I’m being disenfranchised as a tax paying resident; the bulk of state taxes pay for the above things which I derive no direct benefit from.
November 29, 2009 at 11:15 AM #488512Adebisi
Participant[quote=meadandale]
I don’t have kids in school or college, don’t get public assistance (healthcare or welfare), don’t work for the state and don’t know anyone in prison.[/quote]So you only consider prison to be a benefit if people you know are in there? What kind of people do you hang out with?
November 29, 2009 at 11:15 AM #488044Adebisi
Participant[quote=meadandale]
I don’t have kids in school or college, don’t get public assistance (healthcare or welfare), don’t work for the state and don’t know anyone in prison.[/quote]So you only consider prison to be a benefit if people you know are in there? What kind of people do you hang out with?
November 29, 2009 at 11:15 AM #487878Adebisi
Participant[quote=meadandale]
I don’t have kids in school or college, don’t get public assistance (healthcare or welfare), don’t work for the state and don’t know anyone in prison.[/quote]So you only consider prison to be a benefit if people you know are in there? What kind of people do you hang out with?
November 29, 2009 at 11:15 AM #488424Adebisi
Participant[quote=meadandale]
I don’t have kids in school or college, don’t get public assistance (healthcare or welfare), don’t work for the state and don’t know anyone in prison.[/quote]So you only consider prison to be a benefit if people you know are in there? What kind of people do you hang out with?
November 29, 2009 at 11:15 AM #488744Adebisi
Participant[quote=meadandale]
I don’t have kids in school or college, don’t get public assistance (healthcare or welfare), don’t work for the state and don’t know anyone in prison.[/quote]So you only consider prison to be a benefit if people you know are in there? What kind of people do you hang out with?
November 29, 2009 at 12:07 PM #488764NeetaT
ParticipantI’m a “Hawk,” I’m all for war, but you are correct in the fact that we should not have to dig into our hard earned money to pay for wars. They should be paid for via the current inflated-unwarranted tax rate or salary cuts for those in congress.
November 29, 2009 at 12:07 PM #487898NeetaT
ParticipantI’m a “Hawk,” I’m all for war, but you are correct in the fact that we should not have to dig into our hard earned money to pay for wars. They should be paid for via the current inflated-unwarranted tax rate or salary cuts for those in congress.
November 29, 2009 at 12:07 PM #488532NeetaT
ParticipantI’m a “Hawk,” I’m all for war, but you are correct in the fact that we should not have to dig into our hard earned money to pay for wars. They should be paid for via the current inflated-unwarranted tax rate or salary cuts for those in congress.
November 29, 2009 at 12:07 PM #488444NeetaT
ParticipantI’m a “Hawk,” I’m all for war, but you are correct in the fact that we should not have to dig into our hard earned money to pay for wars. They should be paid for via the current inflated-unwarranted tax rate or salary cuts for those in congress.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.